[Animus]

John21 and B_Jim, I will be getting a dvd copy of the show after it airs. Once I do, I'll see if I can try to get it to those of you who want to see it! Or somehow upload it.  Thanks!

[John21 (OP)]

John21 and B_Jim, I will be getting a dvd copy of the show after it airs. Once I do, I'll see if I can try to get it to those of you who want to see it! Or somehow upload it.  Thanks!

That's fantastic, thank you!

[demografx]

Google Alert

Web   1 new result for Postorgasmic Illness Syndrome
http://www.tripdatabase.com/doc/1202217-Allergy--Postorgasmic-illness-syndrome--POIS----local-allergic-symptoms-and-transient-flu-like-illness

Allergy Postorgasmic illness syndromePOIS local allergic symptoms ...
Allergy Postorgasmic illness syndromePOIS local allergic symptoms and transient flulike illness in men httpgooglfbEWL2c. Allergyon Twitter 2011 ...

[demografx]

John21 and B_Jim, I will be getting a dvd copy of the show after it airs. Once I do, I'll see if I can try to get it to those of you who want to see it! Or somehow upload it.  Thanks!

That's fantastic, thank you!

Thank you again!

[demografx]

I also would love to see the TLC program online somehow, I don't currently have cable.

You think that YOU have problems?? Daveman will be trying to play the DVD on his 45 rpm turntable, wondering why it doesn't make any sound!!

[demografx]

Demo,

I received this Google alert today for POIS --
http://allergynotes.blogspot.com/2011/05/postorgasmic-illness-syndrome-pois.html

The author (this is the important part!) is Dr. Ves Dimov -- http://www.uchicagokidshospital.org/physicians/ves-dimov.html.  He would definitely not put his reputation at stake by writing about some imaginary illness called POIS.  He apparently takes it very seriously.

Not shabby -- at all!

POIS has now officially gone mainstream, as far as I'm concerned. :-)  The University of Chicago is a GREAT medical/research hospital--we have awarded several research grants there because of the quality of their research.

Do you men know about him already??

I'll be happy to write to him about potential testing for POIS, etc -- but would you prefer to write??

Stefanie



Sincerely,
 
Stefanie Putkowski, RN, BSN
Clinical Information Specialist
Research Program Administrator
National Organization for Rare Disorders
55 Kenosia Avenue
PO Box 1968
Danbury, CT 06813-1968
Phone: 203.744.0100
Fax: 203.798.2291
email: rn@rarediseases.org
http://www.rarediseases.org
 
Join our online community
http://nord.clinicahealth.com/
 
NORD Subscription Service
http://www.rarediseases.org/programs/subscriptions

[daveman]

I also would love to see the TLC program online somehow, I don't currently have cable.

You think that YOU have problems?? Daveman will be trying to play the DVD on his 45 rpm turntable, wondering why it doesn't make any sound!!

What's a DVD?

[demografx]

 [] [] []

[hurray]

Am just curious when the other forum gets bigger and starts becoming more of the focus of attention, it is going to result in NSF traffic reducing which will result in NSF loosing its ranking in search engines.  i was wondering if there is a plan for that in the future.
I know one way is to index the new site in google and also find ways to broadcast the site around the internet and also volume helps.

I remeber it took three years before NSF went up to number 1/ number 2, we cant afford that with the new forum, if it is becomes the main focus.

Hi CCconfucius,

Huge though our thread is, the POIS posts only account for a fraction of their overall traffic. TNS has an enormous PageRank of 7/10 - by comparison, the Yahoo directory has a PageRank of 8/10 (10/10 only goes to the likes of Google, Youtube and Facebook). There is so much POIS-related unique content on this forum that this thread will always rank highly for POIS and its accompanying symptoms.

No matter how big the new forum gets, it will always be a lot harder to find due to its relative obscurity (with regards to search engines). Not much we can do about that, but there will always be plenty of new posters coming from TNS.

Plus I don't really think the traffic on this thread will slow down too much, if at all. More and more people are discovering POIS, especially since the recent major news coverage. It was only a short time ago that we passed the 1,000,000 views milestone - we are already past 1,100,000

Since the new forum allows a variety of simultaneous discussions to take place, I find myself logging in and posting things that I would not post on the TNS thread - I don't want to clutter this thread up with too many posts, not an issue at the new forum. I suspect many TNS regulars feel the same way, and traffic will continue to grow at a healthy rate on both forums.

This thread keeps me up to date when I don't have time to go through the other forum - when time is plentiful, I can contribute over there also. A win/win situation for everybody.

[daveman]

Some good points hurray. Particularly what you say about both forums being quite active.

One of the MOST important factors to consider in the creation of the new forum, was the potent pull that NSF has.

The desire was to provide a new forum where a focus in activity could be achieved through the ability to separate topics. We didn't want two NSFs, nor to take away from what NSF had. The new forum has a completely diferent style, and initial reactions to this new style and interactions desired by the users tended to stay tied to a NSF way. But now that the forum is up and running, a natural feel and usage style is setting in for each forum, just as you indicate; you go to one for one thing and another for another.

What we want to do, to further facilitate access and a more seamless interactivity is join everything together with a well designed POIS Center.

We are in the process of preparing conditions and implementing an integrated Search Engine Optimization Scheme. Part of this plan in a second stage involves dedicated sponsors which will initially help pay for Google Ad exposure.

Google Ad exposure is very efficient for our application. Whereas it may have a 1% efficiency per click at best for normal sales applications, it has an efficiency closer to 80% per click for POIS sufferers looking for a "home".

So although in this moment it seems like forums here and forums there, and databases in other place and compendiums etc. we are going to unite into one entity. And new resources are and will be attracted, like NORD and other rare disease facilities, where you tend to find community in the understanding of little understood suffering.

I feel that we are JUST getting started, and with OUR group, it's going to be really exciting!

[demografx]

Am just curious when the other forum gets bigger and starts becoming more of the focus of attention, it is going to result in NSF traffic reducing which will result in NSF loosing its ranking in search engines.  i was wondering if there is a plan for that in the future.
I know one way is to index the new site in google and also find ways to broadcast the site around the internet and also volume helps.

I remeber it took three years before NSF went up to number 1/ number 2, we cant afford that with the new forum, if it is becomes the main focus.

Hi CCconfucius,

Huge though our thread is, the POIS posts only account for a fraction of their overall traffic. TNS has an enormous PageRank of 7/10 - by comparison, the Yahoo directory has a PageRank of 8/10 (10/10 only goes to the likes of Google, Youtube and Facebook). There is so much POIS-related unique content on this forum that this thread will always rank highly for POIS and its accompanying symptoms.

No matter how big the new forum gets, it will always be a lot harder to find due to its relative obscurity (with regards to search engines). Not much we can do about that, but there will always be plenty of new posters coming from TNS.

Plus I don't really think the traffic on this thread will slow down too much, if at all. More and more people are discovering POIS, especially since the recent major news coverage. It was only a short time ago that we passed the 1,000,000 views milestone - we are already past 1,100,000

Since the new forum allows a variety of simultaneous discussions to take place, I find myself logging in and posting things that I would not post on the TNS thread - I don't want to clutter this thread up with too many posts, not an issue at the new forum. I suspect many TNS regulars feel the same way, and traffic will continue to grow at a healthy rate on both forums.

This thread keeps me up to date when I don't have time to go through the other forum - when time is plentiful, I can contribute over there also. A win/win situation for everybody.

Hurray, thank you so much for your perspective on the new major developments and changes in POIS' Internet-web presence!

[demografx]

I feel that we are JUST getting started, and with OUR group, it's going to be really exciting!

I disagree. I think it's exciting already! []

[CertainlyPOIS]

Am just curious when the other forum gets bigger and starts becoming more of the focus of attention, it is going to result in NSF traffic reducing which will result in NSF loosing its ranking in search engines.  i was wondering if there is a plan for that in the future.
I know one way is to index the new site in google and also find ways to broadcast the site around the internet and also volume helps.

I remeber it took three years before NSF went up to number 1/ number 2, we cant afford that with the new forum, if it is becomes the main focus.

Hi CCconfucius,

Huge though our thread is, the POIS posts only account for a fraction of their overall traffic. TNS has an enormous PageRank of 7/10 - by comparison, the Yahoo directory has a PageRank of 8/10 (10/10 only goes to the likes of Google, Youtube and Facebook). There is so much POIS-related unique content on this forum that this thread will always rank highly for POIS and its accompanying symptoms.

No matter how big the new forum gets, it will always be a lot harder to find due to its relative obscurity (with regards to search engines). Not much we can do about that, but there will always be plenty of new posters coming from TNS.

Plus I don't really think the traffic on this thread will slow down too much, if at all. More and more people are discovering POIS, especially since the recent major news coverage. It was only a short time ago that we passed the 1,000,000 views milestone - we are already past 1,100,000

Since the new forum allows a variety of simultaneous discussions to take place, I find myself logging in and posting things that I would not post on the TNS thread - I don't want to clutter this thread up with too many posts, not an issue at the new forum. I suspect many TNS regulars feel the same way, and traffic will continue to grow at a healthy rate on both forums.

This thread keeps me up to date when I don't have time to go through the other forum - when time is plentiful, I can contribute over there also. A win/win situation for everybody.

i agree with your all your points, but i believed the goal was to eventually make the move to the other website so things can be more organize. I was not sure about how quickly that transition was going to happen that is why i was curious why we are not trying to create visibility as early as possible and using all the tools available.
As long as we are taking it slowly, nsf is definately taking care of the exposure we need, evident by the current flow of new people.
When it is time to get a domain i believe there is a ways we can share the cost one person shouldnt just do it. 

[CertainlyPOIS]

i tried to become a patient of dr david khan at UTexas southwestern, he denied me. I dont know why he denied me eventhough he has treated semen allergy before( i believe in women) and he is only 4 hrs away from me.
i dont know if you want me to put him in the database or not.

I also talked to dr chadwick i believe. in newyork about 2 months ago, he also treats semen allergy in women but also said he cant treat POIS. ( i dont know if i have mentioned him in the forum yet or not.)

[demografx]

Am just curious when the other forum gets bigger and starts becoming more of the focus of attention, it is going to result in NSF traffic reducing which will result in NSF loosing its ranking in search engines.  i was wondering if there is a plan for that in the future.
I know one way is to index the new site in google and also find ways to broadcast the site around the internet and also volume helps.

I remeber it took three years before NSF went up to number 1/ number 2, we cant afford that with the new forum, if it is becomes the main focus.

Hi CCconfucius,

Huge though our thread is, the POIS posts only account for a fraction of their overall traffic. TNS has an enormous PageRank of 7/10 - by comparison, the Yahoo directory has a PageRank of 8/10 (10/10 only goes to the likes of Google, Youtube and Facebook). There is so much POIS-related unique content on this forum that this thread will always rank highly for POIS and its accompanying symptoms.

No matter how big the new forum gets, it will always be a lot harder to find due to its relative obscurity (with regards to search engines). Not much we can do about that, but there will always be plenty of new posters coming from TNS.

Plus I don't really think the traffic on this thread will slow down too much, if at all. More and more people are discovering POIS, especially since the recent major news coverage. It was only a short time ago that we passed the 1,000,000 views milestone - we are already past 1,100,000

Since the new forum allows a variety of simultaneous discussions to take place, I find myself logging in and posting things that I would not post on the TNS thread - I don't want to clutter this thread up with too many posts, not an issue at the new forum. I suspect many TNS regulars feel the same way, and traffic will continue to grow at a healthy rate on both forums.

This thread keeps me up to date when I don't have time to go through the other forum - when time is plentiful, I can contribute over there also. A win/win situation for everybody.

i agree with your all your points, but i believed the goal was to eventually make the move to the other website so things can be more organize. I was not sure about how quickly that transition was going to happen that is why i was curious why we are not trying to create visibility as early as possible and using all the tools available.
As long as we are taking it slowly, nsf is definately taking care of the exposure we need, evident by the current flow of new people.
When it is time to get a domain i believe there is a ways we can share the cost one person shouldnt just do it. 

CC, thanks for your Great Support. As always!!!  []

[demografx]

i tried to become a patient of dr david khan at UTexas southwestern, he denied me. I dont know why he denied me eventhough he has treated semen allergy before( i believe in women) and he is only 4 hrs away from me.
i dont know if you want me to put him in the database or not.

I also talked to dr chadwick i believe. in newyork about 2 months ago, he also treats semen allergy in women but also said he cant treat POIS. ( i dont know if i have mentioned him in the forum yet or not.)

CC, YOUR judgement about potential Collaborators is most important!

If YOU  think someone is a dork, I don't think he belongs in the database.

[CertainlyPOIS]

Demografx just trying to do my best for the forum, Thank you.

[daveman]

i tried to become a patient of dr david khan at UTexas southwestern, he denied me. I dont know why he denied me eventhough he has treated semen allergy before( i believe in women) and he is only 4 hrs away from me.
i dont know if you want me to put him in the database or not.

I also talked to dr chadwick i believe. in newyork about 2 months ago, he also treats semen allergy in women but also said he cant treat POIS. ( i dont know if i have mentioned him in the forum yet or not.)

Both of those might be better suited to the "Labs and facilities" database.

BTW when the databases and forum change to the new domain, I'll be trying to leave an automatic redirect from the present addresses so as to facilitate your accesses, but it is recommended of course to use the new reference (once that is revealed). Until then, you can still use the present facilities, as nothing will be lost in the transition.

[demografx]

Demografx just trying to do my best for the forum, Thank you.

I know you are, CC, and I can't thank you enough!

[aspagnito]

Tsup John21,
What I've been dealing with is something quite a bit in reverse. Of course after sexual activity comes a time I regret I do live, which is I think quite normal for human males, but there comes a time after that that I am into only thinking. Takes some few hours for such a shake. It's just that I think it is hard for You to manage without sexual activity and I do not want to make fake hope to You, but did You try to specificate Your type of a sexual partner? Maybe it's not biological, but stays in the psyche?
For example. I am sanguine (personality, character, temperament - wiki and other sites for search) and I hate being interested in other sanguines. But I love to be interested in phlegmatics, who seem to be more attractive for me. Quite frankly the worst kind of commitment is between a sanguine and a sanguine... so I believe, that where there's problem, there's got to be a sollurion, a simple, obvious and unique sollution.
Try to experiment with that and maybe You'll have something out of it. In worst case, You'll have a hangover for more than a few hours.
p.s.
if something seems to be impossible, it's probably as possible, as problematic.
Here's the table to discuss (if You wish to)
Let's say
melancholic and sanguine are strong personalities
phlegmatics are strong character
cholerics are strong temperament
FITS
-----T----P----C----
  T  1    0   -1 
  P  0   -1    1
  C -1    1    0
--------------------
-1 = worst fit
 0 = avarage fit
 1 = the best fit

The "examples" of people with different personality, character and temperament who present their sexual activity, are on my blog
http://eternityemperor.blogspot.com/ [nofollow]
NOTE that most of the people are sanguine