The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Could space only be expanding within our boundary of vision?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Could space only be expanding within our boundary of vision?

  • 0 Replies
  • 2976 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thedoc (OP)

  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 510
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 21 times
Could space only be expanding within our boundary of vision?
« on: 16/02/2016 01:50:02 »
Glenn Schwoyer asked the Naked Scientists:
   Greetings- I'm not a scientist. I 'only' have a BS in Business. But I often speculate on topics such as the universe. I don't know what to do with my musings, so here I am. I have some questions / musings that I am hoping you (or someone) will comment on objectively.

1) Observations point to the universe expanding in all directions, correct? But could the entire physical universe, with the exception of 'local' space from the observer's point of view be shrinking? We would not easily be aware of that and because of space not shrinking, it would appear as if everything was expanding. If 'local' space is not a viable concept, could the shrinking be so small that it only appears over great distances? Given the so-called rate of acceleration of the universe translate to in terms of  the rate of the 'shrinking of matter'?

2) What are the ramifications for time? Would this mean time really flows from big (past) to small (future)?

3) If my premise were true, could it somehow help reconcile general relativity and quantum mechanics? Could the uncertainty principle be related to the fact that the smaller is in the future?

I have so many concepts such as these that come to me while I'm falling asleep or as I'm waking up. Often I don't recall them, but this one stuck with me. Is there any way for me Forgive me for any ignorance in my thoughts and try to go easy. Remember, condescension is not the sign of a superior mind! LOL.

Thank you

Glenn Schwoyer
Brown Summit, NC, USA
484-358-5458
What do you think?
« Last Edit: 16/02/2016 01:50:02 by _system »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.328 seconds with 28 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.