The Naked Scientists
The Naked Scientists
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Answers to Science Questions
Do an Experiment
Ask a Question
Meet the team
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
09/04/2016 23:29:07 »
I saw a science program for kids while I was in Japan and despite being an engineer and knowing how to use Google, I genuinely am completely stumped by this one, being neither able to explain it, or to phrase the question in a way that Google might be able to give me an answer. Any explanation, greatly appreciated! Here is how you can replicate what I saw:
1. Tape a magnet down to the table, it appears that any permanent magnet will do
2. Get something non-magnetised, but with some iron in it or possibly anything ferromagnetic (they used ball bearings, although I can confirm it works with paper clips too, but only if you have a strong enough magnet)
3. Stack two of the objects in No.2 above, on top of the magnet (ie. magnet, ball bearing 1, ball bearing 2)
4. Now grab the upper ball bearing (2) and pull
5. Unbelievably, the ball bearing in contact with the magnet (1) comes away with the top ball bearing!?! Don't believe me, try it yourself!
Having thought it through, I would expect that if I pull the top ball bearing then I would pull just that one away, as I expect the ball bearing in contact with the magnet to be more strongly attracted to the magnet, than the ball bearing that has had magnetism induced in it only temporarily by the magnet itself. I have to come to the conclusion here that the magnetism induced in the ball bearings is stronger than that in the magnet that is inducing that magnetism. I'm not sure how this can be true but having done as much research as can, I think one of the below might be the explanation, not sure which, if any of the possible explanations is right though...
1. The shape of the objects I have tried, ie ball bearings and paper clips are all kind of circular. Maybe this is helping to concentrate the magnetic field. I don't unfortunately have a circular magnet, just ones that have flat surfaces. I tried it on the corner of one magnet though and I got the same result. Might mean that this theory is already proven incorrect...
2. The material that common permanent magnets are made from has a lower something (inductance? permeability?) than iron and therefore in the presence of the same magnetic field strength, won't be as strong a magnet. I think this one is probably my pick, but I don't know which magnetic property it is that may be the cause and therefore, I'm not sure this is truly an explanation...
There appear to be some caveats though. It doesn't seem to work very well for very strong magnets like neodymium and also for very small ball bearings. Otherwise, it's pretty consistent.
Sorry for the long post. Any help greatly appreciated!
Thanked: 16 times
Re: Induced magnetism
Reply #1 on:
29/06/2016 11:36:10 »
The parameter related to this experiment is magnetization.
...sorry, you cannot view external links. To see them, please
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
There was an error while thanking