0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
"The new generation of early-career physicists is more open to dark matter other than WIMPs""WIMPs start to look a little less good, so people are these days are considering other possibilities."
'Physicists Look Beyond WIMPs For Dark Matter'https://www.insidescience.org/content/physicists-look-beyond-wimps-dark-matter/3916Quote"The new generation of early-career physicists is more open to dark matter other than WIMPs""WIMPs start to look a little less good, so people are these days are considering other possibilities."Is it time to understand dark matter fills 'empty' space and is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it, including 'particles' as large as galaxy clusters?What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment, the strongly interacting dark matter which fills 'empty' space.Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's wave of wave-particle duality, both are waves in the strongly interacting dark matter.Dark matter displaced by matter relates general relativity and quantum mechanics.
What is WIMP's?
WIMPS are one of the more popular theories about the origin of "Dark Matter".But there are many such theories, some of them not involving dark matter at all.See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter#Cold_dark_matter
[qDark matter fills 'empty' space and is displaced by matter.
I prefer dark energy is empty space and can pass through matter and matter can likewise pass through it . I consider dark matter is something that doe's not reflect light.
“Some of the matter falling towards the holes is converted into energy. This energy is delivered to the surrounding gas, and leads to large outflows of matter, which stretch for hundreds of thousands of light years from the black holes, reaching far beyond the extent of their host galaxies,” the astronomers explained.
Dark energy is dark matter continuously emitted into and flowing through our visible Universe. It is the dark matter flowing through our visible Universe which pushes the galaxy clusters, causing them to accelerating away from us.
Yes it is quite a good theory, however it should be called light matter
It should be called aether. Aether has mass, physically occupies three dimensional space and is physically displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it. Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's wave of wave-particle duality, both are waves in the aether.
Dark energy is aether continuously emitted by the Universal black hole that flows through our visible Universe pushing the galaxy clusters, causing them to accelerate away from us.
Aether does not have mass, it does not exist , it was undetected
"Think of waves on the surface of water. Here we can describe two entirely different things. Either we may observe how the undulatory surface forming the boundary between water and air alters in the course of time; or else-with the help of small floats, for instance - we can observe how the position of the separate particles of water alters in the course of time. If the existence of such floats for tracking the motion of the particles of a fluid were a fundamental impossibility in physics - if, in fact nothing else whatever were observable than the shape of the space occupied by the water as it varies in time, we should have no ground for the assumption that water consists of movable particles. But all the same we could characterise it as a medium."
Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2016 16:02:34Aether does not have mass, it does not exist , it was undetectedThe Michelson-Morley experiment looked for an absolutely stationary space the Earth moves through. The aether is not an absolutely stationary space. The aether is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it.'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.htmlQuote"Think of waves on the surface of water. Here we can describe two entirely different things. Either we may observe how the undulatory surface forming the boundary between water and air alters in the course of time; or else-with the help of small floats, for instance - we can observe how the position of the separate particles of water alters in the course of time. If the existence of such floats for tracking the motion of the particles of a fluid were a fundamental impossibility in physics - if, in fact nothing else whatever were observable than the shape of the space occupied by the water as it varies in time, we should have no ground for the assumption that water consists of movable particles. But all the same we could characterise it as a medium."if, in fact nothing else whatever were observable than the shape of the space occupied by the aether as it varies in time, we should have no ground for the assumption that aether consists of particles which can be individually tracked through time. But all the same we could characterise it as a medium having mass which is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it.
if, in fact nothing else whatever were observable than the shape of the space occupied by the aether as it varies in time,
I think you are trying to say that light is the aether, and that things have affect on the aether?
“When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the physical reality of waves and particles.”“any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous “energetic contact” with a hidden medium”
"For me, the particle, precisely located in space at every instant, forms on the v wave a small region of high energy concentration, which may be likened in a first approximation, to a moving singularity."
"the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave"
The shape of space is not observable, you can only observe point sources. The inverse square law is a failure, it is a quantum tunnel between two point sources, and F(Sm1) =F(Sm2)=0 =r where S is entropy and F is force and r is radius, but all radius's are dynamic.I am not a scientist though, I am just discussing my opinions
Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2016 16:31:12The shape of space is not observable, you can only observe point sources. The inverse square law is a failure, it is a quantum tunnel between two point sources, and F(Sm1) =F(Sm2)=0 =r where S is entropy and F is force and r is radius, but all radius's are dynamic.I am not a scientist though, I am just discussing my opinionsEinstein is saying the shape of the space is defined by the matter. Think of a bunch of stuff thrown into a pool. The shape of the water is defined by the objects thrown into the pool. The aether is displaced by the matter. The state of displacement of the aether is its shape.
Think of a bunch of stuff thrown into a pool. The shape of the water is defined by the objects thrown into the pool.
No, the water is displaced by the mass of stones, space is not displaced by the balloons skin, the inflating balloon can displace water, it cant displace space, water is a bad example. Although the balloon underwater inflating shows space is static
The individual quarks the balloon consists of displace the aether. Aether exists everywhere the quarks do not. Where the quarks exist the aether is displaced.
Hmmmm, ok I have to agree with that because that seems quite logical.