The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. Famous Scientists, Doctors and Inventors
  4. Pasteur was lucky, so was Mendel, a puzzle for you
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Pasteur was lucky, so was Mendel, a puzzle for you

  • 6 Replies
  • 10445 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ylide (OP)

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 905
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
    • http://clem.mscd.edu/~mogavero
Pasteur was lucky, so was Mendel, a puzzle for you
« on: 17/02/2004 22:27:46 »
Pasteur and Mendel, two great scientists that were foundations of advancement in their respective fields.

Both of them were skilled and insightful.  Both of them got lucky.  Anyone want to venture guesses why?



This message brought to you by The Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People
Logged
This message brought to you by The Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People
 



Offline qpan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 260
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Re: Pasteur was lucky, so was Mendel, a puzzle for you
« Reply #1 on: 19/02/2004 19:01:19 »
Pasteur - didn't he discover that people who contracted cowpox were immune to smallpox and subsequently created a vaccine for it?
And mendel discovered dominant genes (by observing pea plants)- although i'm not sure if that was an accident!

"I have great faith in fools; self-confidence my friends call it."
-Edgar Allan Poe
« Last Edit: 19/02/2004 19:03:54 by qpan »
Logged
 

Offline Ylide (OP)

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 905
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
    • http://clem.mscd.edu/~mogavero
Re: Pasteur was lucky, so was Mendel, a puzzle for you
« Reply #2 on: 19/02/2004 23:21:39 »
I probably should have specified which Pasteur experiment.  [:P]

Most scientists in Pasteur's time believed in spontaneous generation...that a motive force (in this case air) caused certain materials to "spontaneously" produce life.  For instance, they believed bacteria and maggots were a product of air and food.  They believed mice were a product of straw and dirt.  Someone even patented a method for spontaneously generating mice...leave a sweaty old shirt lying in a pile of straw in the barn, then in two weeks, you'll have mice in it!  His experiment in which he disproved spontaneous generation by boiling broth (to kill any present bacteria), then leaving it exposed to air but only through a twisty glass tube so that bacteria couldn't fall into the brew.  He was lucky because if the bacteria he boiled to death were capable for forming endospores (genera Bacillus and Claustridium do this) they would have survived the boiling and recontaminated the broth.

Mendel was lucky because the traits he examined in the pea plants (seven in total) all happened to be on different chromosomes.  If any had been on the same chromosome, this would have screwed up his numbers and his theories of segregation and independent assortment would not have gotten off the ground.  (it took 30 years for people to realize the relevance of his work as it is!)



This message brought to you by The Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People
Logged
This message brought to you by The Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People
 

Offline MayoFlyFarmer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 887
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
    • View Profile
    • http://www.myspace.com/wiguyinmn
Re: Pasteur was lucky, so was Mendel, a puzzle for you
« Reply #3 on: 21/03/2004 16:38:21 »
hehe, I've always been amazed by how lucky almost all of the great scientists of history have been (its the only thing that gives me hope that I can survive in this field).  But While as canbinoid pointed out that both pastur and mendel WERE lucky in that they nature just happened to control some variables that they didn't know about, I think we could find a lot of scientists who got WAY more lucky than them (mendel especially) had very good experimental technique considering his prior knowledge.
Now what about things like penecillin.  Thats the unlimate example of lucky science.

Yar, the flies be everywhere maty....save yerselves!!!
Logged
How much CAML do you have in your toes?
 

Offline qazibasit

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 344
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Pasteur was lucky, so was Mendel, a puzzle for you
« Reply #4 on: 26/06/2004 16:09:18 »
ya both of them were lucky because GOD made their fate good.
Logged
"There is never too late to make a change".
 



Offline neilep

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 20788
  • Activity:
    2.5%
  • Thanked: 55 times
    • View Profile
Re: Pasteur was lucky, so was Mendel, a puzzle for you
« Reply #5 on: 26/06/2004 19:22:24 »
(My Opinion ok ?)......what has GOD got to do with it ?...what's the point of self discovery if GOD is there to lead the way or present the answers for you ?........if they were lucky to make those discoveries then it's just that.....in fact I don't even believe in luck...it's all happenstance.....what is there left for people to achieve if it's all predetermined ?.........actually...no need to answer....this is just gonna start a whole new GOD debate isn't it ?...



'Men are the same as women...just inside out !'
Logged
Men are the same as women, just inside out !
 

Offline VAlibrarian

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 173
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Pasteur was lucky, so was Mendel, a puzzle for you
« Reply #6 on: 27/08/2005 03:53:02 »
I think it is worth mentioning that Pasteur was very very persistent. He worked on Anthrax, silkworm diseases, beer contamination, Rabies: practical diseases that were destroying industries or in the case of Rabies resulting in horrible deaths of humans. He was devoted to theoretical research, but even more devoted to saving suffering humanity, and he was rightly idolized because of it.

chris wiegard
Logged
chris wiegard
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

"liber al" / "book of the law" puzzle

Started by kranwanBoard That CAN'T be true!

Replies: 1
Views: 5614
Last post 11/07/2015 12:00:50
by Beer w/Straw
Why Is It Easier To Complete A Puzzle After A "time-out" ?

Started by neilepBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 7
Views: 1083
Last post 14/08/2019 18:05:34
by alancalverd
Was the puzzle of the connection between QSOs and galaxy clusters ever resolved?

Started by graham.dBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 4
Views: 3380
Last post 19/04/2010 15:10:07
by graham.d
Puzzle - is plasticiser ruining the vinyl records

Started by BillbaxterBoard General Science

Replies: 4
Views: 4324
Last post 12/02/2011 17:07:44
by Billbaxter
Why is the weakness of gravity regarded as a puzzle?

Started by peterhouseholdBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 11
Views: 9355
Last post 24/02/2007 20:35:15
by lightarrow
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.11 seconds with 54 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.