[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

Theoretical Physics
By Trevor Borocz Johnson

A universe and a quark are composed of the same substance that is Space-time and have the same properties, properties like fusion in stars, the periodic table, the chemistry for life, nature etc.. Space, which I refer to as void, and time which I refer to as energy, are woven together to form a universe or a quark. A universe or quark is then composed of cubic void blocks and energy lining those void blocks in a cubic honeycomb symmetry. A universe or quark is shaped like a cube.

A Quark is a super dense, super small, area of space-time. An area of denser space-time will put a transcendent squeezing or density in the surrounding space-time it exists in. Void blocks surrounding the quark are squeezed smaller by the super dense dimension of the quark. A body such as a planet creates a field of these denser void blocks because of the combined gravity field of the astronomical number of quarks in the planet. A quark passing by will “fall” into this field as it is attracted to the region of denser void which only increases the closer you are to the planet.

Just like the super dense space-time of the quark puts a transcendent squeezing effect on the surrounding space-time its in, so too does the planet's gravity field have this effect on the edge of the quarks gravity field. When the edge of the gravity field of the quark touches the gravity field of the planet, the part of the outer layer touching the planet's gravity field becomes as dense as the outer layer of the planet's gravity field. The space time of the quarks gravity field that is squeezed becomes smaller in size, the quark and its gravity field then experience momentum in the direction of the squeezing, each successive layer of the planet's gravity field pulling it in faster. The denser space which increases the closer to the planet, has the more powerful attraction force and the quark is pulled in that direction giving it momentum energy. The quark and the planet both pull on each other and effect one another in ratio to their size.

If a body with a gravity field loses weight or during an object’s momentum on the surface of said body The field in its entirety decreases, and the units of empty space void expand slightly in a wave that perpetuates outward from the object. This is what creates gravity waves.

The number of quarks in a human body is 1.345 x 10^29. The area in which all the quarks of the earth would occupy if only quarks were to fill a region is a sphere with a diameter of .7 inches. That puts the weight of the earth into a teaspoon. In comparison to the size of the gravity field they create from there desolate existence it is clear that a quark has a much greater role in the universe then that of its physical boundaries. The limits of the gravitational boundaries of a single quark is of an inch to a sphere with a radius of up to four million miles. It is at this boundary to a single quark that its influence on space-time seizes and it can go back to its regular state. That is for a single quark. For the nucleus of a hydrogen atom which contains six quarks, three in its neutron and three in its proton, the region of boundary where the influence of gravity and compressed space-time returns to its regular state may ‘wobble’ between several different boundaries in accordance with the combination of quark spins. These different boundaries are what make up the different electron shells that an atom can have. From here at these boundaries, the atom’s retain the electron’s that compose their essence.  An electron then is simply a slice of energy whose amount is calculated by the edge of the region of space that is affected by an atom’s gravity.

The strong form of energy is electromagnetic radiation(EMR) and electrons, and its inactive form is a weak energy dimension, the time of space-time. This weaker energy dimension is like a grid and has the property of flowing. The weaker energy dimension of empty space is a lining between the blocks of empty space void. It would resemble something like the lines on a sheet of graph paper where the white blocks on the sheet are the units of empty space void.

Electromagnetic radiation is a stress on this weaker dimensional energy of empty space. The stress gives energy and electrons ‘weight’ by squeezing on the dimensional void of space-time its in creating the effect of gravity. The squeezing stress itself is invisible which can be observed by holding a flashlight or LED behind one’s head and pointing it in the direction of sight in the dark. Anything within the region of squeezing will become illuminated but space itself will remain dark. In a sunlit room each illuminated object will add its own hue of coloration to the overall tension in the room which can be observed by holding a white sheet of paper in the center of the room. The sheet of paper will reflect the mixture of colorations that are present in the tension of empty space and changes as you move it around.

Magnetism is a property of the flowing of the empty space energy dimension. In a ferromagnetic material all the electrons orbit in the same direction. This creates a fan like churning of the empty space energy dimension. A magnetic field is then stirred up like wind through fan blades where one side of the material, south, is the draw for the fan, and the other side of the material, north, is the region that the ‘air’ would fill. Thusly two north ends repel each other and so do two southern ends. When you move the magnet around you change the region of empty space which it has an effect on.

[quasimodo]

Could the overall answer be correct?

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

I'm still thinking on this idea. I'm working on a video with pictures that's only about a minute long.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

[nilak]

spacetime is not a substance it is free space and time. But space could be occupied by a medium that enables the existence of fields.

[kah-len]

This is my theory on this subject...

Time is measured by the chronon in this 3rd dimensional reality and I will try to explain this the best way I can.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I am not a mathematician so please bear with me...

How I see that space-time really works is this...

Every second that you live your life, is like a radio frequency..

say at your birth the frequency was 1.00001 on the dial. At age 1 day, the frequency is now 103,680.00001 (in seconds)
× 365 = 37,843,200.00001 (seconds) on the dial and every second of each and every moment and there are even more slices of time-frequencies in between those milliseconds as well such as 365000.45332455554333999
etc... each millisecond has its own slice of time frequency that stands still and we continue the moving picture stills or "pages" of time slices.

Each and every number is a time-slice or frequency of that moment.
The very day you were born still exists as a frequency set to 1.00001 (if that was also the beginning of all time) and you can go back there by setting the frequency to that time.

In reality, time would be in the range of septillionths since the big bang would be considered the 0.000001 slice.

The earliest calculation some 47 trillion years ago, If you take into effect the speed of light from the time of creation.
(Billy Albert Meier had calculated the half life of the speed of light and from that he measured closest to the exact time of the big bang including the 7 hyperspaces it created.)

0 Being the actual point of explosion 1 being the explosion and -1 being the implosion.

Time travel itself would be compared to changing the radio dial to the frequency or number of time slices that were created. Because we cannot know the exact time of the big bang to calculate, we would have to work backwards from this time and get approximates within the milliseconds.

To travel in time, you need to use the frequencies smaller then the chronon and that is where the tachyons come in.
They travel billions of times the speed of light.. The sub-neutrinos could be used as a carrier to transmit the signal to the past or the future.

Everything is frequency!
Brain waves do travel outside the body and thought is a particle that travels faster than light.

Forget about the 24hr clock and think of it as linear time. Each separate multiverse has its time line traveling in the same direction and speed as our own but sometimes the frequency of 2 or 3 want to share the same band wave and they cross each other like a double or triple helix causing what is known as the Mandela effect.

Thoughts anyone???

[kah-len]

Also my theory...

I believe that photonic resonance Or I would call it (Photo-Radionics) (Light-Sound).
The universe I believe originally began with sound and is what causes the speed in which the atoms pulsate. I believe that the frequency of the photons change their frequency by crossing each others path. Crossing each others paths zillions of times over changes their spin rate, frequencies or temperatures etc.. It would take at least trillions of years for these photons to be created and I believe that sound waves gave birth to photons. Photons mixing from all directions causing slight dips and slight increases in temperatures just slightly above the absolute zero -252.9 °C where the hydrogen begins to boil and eventually ignite. In absolute zero all of the elements glue themselves to each other. Heating and cooling causes the centrifugal force to begin and as the molecular clouds bind themselves within the vortex a star is born. Sometimes the star slowly burns out and becomes a planet. It would take approximately 40 trillion years of mixing gasses and molecules before the star or planet is born and then approximately 40 billion years before it could contain any sort of life as the necessities of life fall from the stars,
or they get pushed out from the core of the planet's centrifugal force. The birth of gravity comes from the heating and cooling temperatures before and during the birth of a new sun. The core of the sun speeds up and maintains it's velocity causing the gravitation pushing and pulling of the planets around itself. The heat pushes and the core pulls.
I also believe there is something such as dark light.. many wave lengths of dark light that we cannot see and also there is a possibility of not just a cold fusion that scientists just discovered but a cold heat or cold combustion that breaks down plasma. That would have to happen in temperatures approximate to the positive boiling point of hydrogen. A minus boiling point of the same below the absolute zero of -273.15 or roughly -293.15

The invisible low frequency sound waves is what I feel is the dark matter that connects us all because that same
"stuff" is also pure consciousness. This would explain the wave–particle duality and the reasons why the wave instantly becomes a particle when it is directly observed. Conciseness is the wave and awareness causes the particle to receive new instructions from the observer.

Thoughts anyone???

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

Also my theory...

I believe that photonic resonance Or I would call it (Photo-Radionics) (Light-Sound).
The universe I believe originally began with sound and is what causes the speed in which the atoms pulsate. I believe that the frequency of the photons change their frequency by crossing each others path. Crossing each others paths zillions of times over changes their spin rate, frequencies or temperatures etc.. It would take at least trillions of years for these photons to be created and I believe that sound waves gave birth to photons. Photons mixing from all directions causing slight dips and slight increases in temperatures just slightly above the absolute zero -252.9 °C where the hydrogen begins to boil and eventually ignite. In absolute zero all of the elements glue themselves to each other. Heating and cooling causes the centrifugal force to begin and as the molecular clouds bind themselves within the vortex a star is born. Sometimes the star slowly burns out and becomes a planet. It would take approximately 40 trillion years of mixing gasses and molecules before the star or planet is born and then approximately 40 billion years before it could contain any sort of life as the necessities of life fall from the stars,
or they get pushed out from the core of the planet's centrifugal force. The birth of gravity comes from the heating and cooling temperatures before and during the birth of a new sun. The core of the sun speeds up and maintains it's velocity causing the gravitation pushing and pulling of the planets around itself. The heat pushes and the core pulls.
I also believe there is something such as dark light.. many wave lengths of dark light that we cannot see and also there is a possibility of not just a cold fusion that scientists just discovered but a cold heat or cold combustion that breaks down plasma. That would have to happen in temperatures approximate to the positive boiling point of hydrogen. A minus boiling point of the same below the absolute zero of -273.15 or roughly -293.15

The invisible low frequency sound waves is what I feel is the dark matter that connects us all because that same
"stuff" is also pure consciousness. This would explain the wave–particle duality and the reasons why the wave instantly becomes a particle when it is directly observed. Conciseness is the wave and awareness causes the particle to receive new instructions from the observer.

Thoughts anyone???

you have to explain your theory to me again as I am lost. you think gravity comes out of sound? is that it? help me

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

magnetism is pretty amazing, it creates a force in invisible space causing us to almost say space is nothing, but if it can make this amazing force it must be a something.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

Anybody else have knowledge of unexplained things that may relate and be answered by the theory in the OP, example how electromagnetism works on space time. I know for those of you who disagree there is some reason in the back of your head.

[GoC]

Quarks reduce further so space is not quarks. The cubic lattice is not a cube but its most likely triangles made from 2d complimentary spin states 45 degrees offset and 90 degree spin state as energy. You need to describe how energy is created and not jut say energy. A 45 degree offset allows for expansion that a cubic lattice would not allow.

I like the way you are thinking.

[pasala]

 "Quark is a super dense, super small, area of space-time. An area of denser space-time will put a transcendent squeezing or density in the surrounding space-time it exists in. Void blocks surrounding the quark are squeezed smaller by the super dense dimension of the quark. A body such as a planet creates a field of these denser void blocks because of the combined gravity field of the astronomical number of quarks in the planet. A quark passing by will “fall” into this field as it is attracted to the region of denser void which only increases the closer you are to the planet".

Well, do you think that quarks behave similarly at all places.   A quark on the Earth behaves differently, when compared to a similar quark in space and outside our universe.  If this is solved than quantum theory will take a U turn and in fact Gravity.

Yours
Psreddy

[pasala]

"The smallest particles of matter, such as protons and neutrons, are made of extremely dense substance of space time. Their density puts a squeezing force in the surrounding space time they exist in. The force is stronger the closer to the particle. This causes a gravity field. When a gravity field touches another gravity field, the same squeezing force of space time on space time applies and the larger gravity field squeezes on the weaker one pulling it harder. Both objects then move towards each other in proportion to there weight".

It is true and this is an wonderful theory.  Yet, there are number of questions.  It is said that matter is made up of extremely dense substance of space time and its density creates a squeezing effect on surroundings.
01  So, density of matter depends on space time
02  Suppose if the space time is weak, density created there on is also weak
03  In case if the space time at a particular place is strong, inner density of matter increases.
04  If the inner density increases, a strong gravity field is created.

Gravity of matter mainly depends on the gravity of space time.  We are all living on the Earth, where strong gravity field persists. Most of our research and focus is based on the things on the Earth.  Suppose if we move to Moon, where space time is weak and thus gravity.  Matter cannot create same gravity.  For that if we move to deep caves where gravity is weak, inner density of matter decreases and thus gravity.

E=MC2 is not equal at all places. 

I feel, this subject warrants lot of research and i am sure that it paves way for "What exactly gravity is".

Yours
Psreddy

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

"The smallest particles of matter, such as protons and neutrons, are made of extremely dense substance of space time. Their density puts a squeezing force in the surrounding space time they exist in. The force is stronger the closer to the particle. This causes a gravity field. When a gravity field touches another gravity field, the same squeezing force of space time on space time applies and the larger gravity field squeezes on the weaker one pulling it harder. Both objects then move towards each other in proportion to there weight".

It is true and this is an wonderful theory.  Yet, there are number of questions.  It is said that matter is made up of extremely dense substance of space time and its density creates a squeezing effect on surroundings.
01  So, density of matter depends on space time
02  Suppose if the space time is weak, density created there on is also weak
03  In case if the space time at a particular place is strong, inner density of matter increases.
04  If the inner density increases, a strong gravity field is created.

Gravity of matter mainly depends on the gravity of space time.  We are all living on the Earth, where strong gravity field persists. Most of our research and focus is based on the things on the Earth.  Suppose if we move to Moon, where space time is weak and thus gravity.  Matter cannot create same gravity.  For that if we move to deep caves where gravity is weak, inner density of matter decreases and thus gravity.

E=MC2 is not equal at all places. 

I feel, this subject warrants lot of research and i am sure that it paves way for "What exactly gravity is".

Yours
Psreddy

The gravity field of matter does change in radius when in different gravity fields. The Density of the larger gravity field matches the outer layers of particles individual gravity fields, causing them to shrink. You describe it as the inner density of matter increases. What do you mean by this?

[pasala]

Well, we are discussing about so many things, gravity of quarks, gravity of planets, but in exact terms we are not, in fact, not aware of “what exactly is gravity” and how it is created.  We talk about squeezing effect of quarks.  In case if the planets, by virtue of quarks creates gravity field than why it varies from plane to planet. 

Well, of course it is one’s surprise to see how a quark can create its own gravity field and influences the gravity field of planet.   

We are all living in a strong gravity field and doing research which is misleading us.  Suppose if we do the same, in a place where there is no gravity at all, quarks behave differently. 

Suppose if the gravity of quark, (minute)               = x
Gravity at a particular place                                   = 7.82
Influence of space time gravity on a quark            = 7.82x

Suppose if the quark is squeezed   
Amount of energy freed                                        =    E
Amount of energy boosted                                   = 7.82E2
Gravity of the quark                                              = X7.82E2.
If the squeezing increases, it results in explosion.

Ok, let us discuss about Electromagnetic effect:
Electromagnetic circles are created only when we send electricity in any particular route or way.  It is true that electrons are neither created nor destroyed and it can only modified into different ways.  Suppose we are producing electricity, with the help of magnet.  We are drawing electrons from the open air, with the help of magnet and making them to flow in any one direction.

Here Electrons are already in the open area.

But there is no magnetic circles.

Only when electricity is made to flow by a cable, magnetic circles are created.

So, to have Electromagnetic influence on the Gravity, electrons must be made to flow in any particular route,  with pressure or force, which will be having devastating effect on the Planet.

How Gravity works:
We must remember that total universe, including our planet are present in a free state.  Electrons are flowing from one place to other place without any force or pressure.  In the curvature of space time, electrons are moving freely.  They are dragging the electrons in the open air.  Well, we have to remember that Earth already lost its weight due to gravity and it is in free State.  Even slight change can cause Earth to rotate.

Yours
Psreddy

[pasala]

Mr Trevorjhonson32,

I think you find it, of course something not from any books and different, logically drawn that may or may not be correct and i am sure bothering your mind.  If any body raises and says, Einstein theory E=MC2, without any hesitation we all raises our hands and support it. 

But we do not, including senior scientists say how an atom when ignited is giving huge energy. 

01 It is true that before ignition the atom is at stable condition.
02 When the atom is split huge energy is coming out.
03 Ok, let us think that there are sub-atoms.
04 In normal condition, how much energy is stored in a atom.
05 Even if sub-atomic particles releases energy, how much energy comes out.

Basically an atom consists of very, very small amount of energy and it has no capacity to make any wonders.  When we equate Mass with energy, total energy must come out from the atom only. 

Ok, in case total energy is from the particle only, how it is in stable condition.   

The mass of a proton is 1.672 x 10^-27 kilograms
But it contains 1.505 x 10^-10 joules only.

When ignited, energy stored within atom only comes out and it has no capacity to make any wonders and it must be equal at all places.

But it is happening differently and when an atom is ignited huge energy is coming out. 

It is surprising to see, no body including senior scientists are not concentrating on this.  It is true that it also varies from place to place and according to gravity.  When Mass is equated to Energy, it must be equal at all places.

If we start thinking in this angle also, new things comes out or it is like a fighting in darkness.   

If the truth comes out, research takes a big loop and chances of developing anti atomic bombs or method of diffusing them will come out and human beings will be saved from this menace.

Yours
Psreddy

[panoptos]

Thank you for your explanation of the theory of space-time.  Whilst what you say may appear to be true given todays human limits of perception and cognitive development, it seems what you have said is more of a description based on current observations and mathematical language than a definition.  Terms like space and time have been conflated with the term universe.  Is there one, or are there more than one Universes?  If there are more than one Universes, why use the term Universe which starts with the prefix "Uni" meaning one?  Surely this forms a logical inconsistency if the term universe can relate to more than one?  Wouldn't it be better to define THE one Universe and sub-divide it into subverses and talk about space-time forming a subverse?  Next, defining space and time... can you please define space in terms of foundational Universal properties or postulates?  Also time is used in many ways when describing what we perceive as our Universe.  If space and time interact, what is the exact nature of time?  Not the "arrow of time" or the consequence of a "big bang", or the relativity that time suggests between one universal position and the next perceptible universal position, but linked to some defined originating concept from which the Big Bang and a direction of time can be measured/compared (even as an ideated concept) with consistent usage when discussing the exact nature of time and its consequences?  Describing something that can be observed is necessary for verification of perceptions through the scientific method, and any other independent method of verification.  However, I can describe the number 1 in terms of 1 egg, 1 proton etc. yet without anchoring it to zero as in the Peano postulates, or the number 2 as in concrete discrete systems, the direction of numbers would not exist.  So to achor the concepts of time and space, what would you postulate as a minimal statement from which these concepts can be evolved?  Or in fact, have I missed something fundamentally simple to be equivalent to triviality in mathematical proofs?  Please keep in mind that we only use the language of mathematics as a descriptive language where our descriptions are based on a logical structure and the consequence of the human languages we use to articulate these symbolic descriptions which are verified through an independent method of comparison with observations made of the Universe (and I will only acknowledge one universe, by definition) such as the scientific method.  Thoughts please?

[pasala]

Mr Panoptos

At this juncture, I think it is very difficult to define or say anything about space time. 

“As per Einstein curvature of space time is responsible for gravity. Space and time in Einstein's universe are no longer flat (as implicitly assumed by Newton) but can pushed and pulled, stretched and warped by matter. Gravity feels strongest where space time is most curved, and it vanishes where space time is flat. This is the core of Einstein's theory of general relativity, which is often summed up in words as follows: "matter tells space time how to curve, and curved space time tells matter how to move".

In my view, Gravity is an unfinished agenda in the files of Einstein.  He is of the opinion that relativity transforms away Gravity and equated it with acceleration.  Ok, let us discuss with a simple example.  Suppose you are in a house and it catches fire and radiation start raising.  If you are in inertial position, radiation start giving trouble.  If you move from one corner to other corner, you can temporarily transform away from radiation. 

Here, there are so many important implications:
01 If there is no fire than there is no radiation at all.
02 If there is no roof than there is no scope for accumulation of radiation.
03 If there is no accumulation of radiation, than relativity will not work.

In Einstein theory of relativity, this medium or the process by which it is happening is absent.  As per Einstein, Space time is completely filled with matter.  But how these particles are raising.  Space time is working like a roof in our example.  Why and how these particles are concentrating at a particular place only and why don’t they move away are come down.  Suppose if the Gravity curve is created by the planet than why it differs from planet to planet.   

In my view Space time itself is a big question and we have to discuss it without moving to dark matter or dark energy and black holes and if it is resolved than the puzzle of gravity is solved. 

Yours
Psreddy

[panoptos]

Mr Psreddy

It seems that you are calling 'time-out' on looking beyond Einstein.

No improvements in technology or understand have ever occurred by thinking within limited cognitive structures, whether it was Aristotle, Archimedes, Gallileo, Fermat, De Cartes or even Einstein.  May I suggest that the next step in understanding our Universe will not come only from accepting Einstein's established constructs and the efforts of the many who have elaborated upon them. Accepting the pelop (the "Perceiving Entity's Limits Of Perception") as you have by basically acknowledging the limitations and treading water until the next linked findings have been established will limit progress since it is based on the assumption that thinking 'the same' will lead to the next greatest discovery.  This has never happened in history, so I challenge you and the others who limit themselves by just saying "we do not know", which, respectfully, is what you have just said by saying "At this juncture" and "In my view".  The forerunners of Einstein would have said exactly the same thing.  What I am trying to do is change tack, and look for a more elemental originating base from which we can generate self-consistent structures that may indeed lead to the resolution of the problems you have posed in your reply.  This may require a re-definition of terms we think we know the meaning of, and even re-structuring of our foundational conceptual bases.  We are all working within our pelops but will only achive greater understanding by constant re-evaluation of what we think we know, and by acknowledgement of what then fits that new framework from what we have already established as matching Universal processes.  So all that you have said may indeed be true, but again nothing you have said will break the mold of, to use a term I am learning to hate, thinking "within the box/square/other confine". You have yourself said that "space time is a big question" so I am starting the process of getting the confined to break their shackles but, not from a position of belief or assertion or just questioning, but to start with foundational statements ... postulates, corollaries etc, which are similar to the time when Peano postulated the existence of 0 and 1 to start a justification for the pre-existing number systems.  I am currently in the process of finalising a book "On The Origins Of Perception From First Principles" and require a definition of time that at present is non-definitive as to its origins in the human world.  To that end I am positing a starting point of trivial definitions that do not contradict anything that is currently proveable using our descriptive languages such as mathematics and english.  I look forward to your contribution (see the topic in this blog  "How justified is your understanding of the foundations of the Universe?").  I suggest that you can shold you beliefs and unresolved questions regarding the questions you have raised in you above reply to my post, whilst at the same time engaging in the process of re-thinking the structures and definitions we currently accept to seek another path.  I am suggesting redefinition of some existing terms we use in an attempt to unify and extend our current accepted scientific knowledge, whether string theory, quantum theory, chaos theory or any other structure we have currently modelled using our languages of communication such as mathematics and our independent verification methodologies such as the scientific method supported by peer-review as the means of agreeing on what we currently know... 'Currently' being relativity for humans. Thanks for the time you have taken to reply and restate what we already know and do not know.  Time to change the direction of our thinking perhaps?  Only then can we take the next leap of understanding of our one beautiful Universe. Sorry for cuttin this short.  The power company are doing maintenance and are about to cut off the supply of my electrons.

[imetheman]

I believe that any theory which purports to be an accurate alternative description of any aspect of physical reality, must incorporate the existence of consciousness into every aspect of the theory. Insofar as the extent to which consciousness is incorporated into the theory, the theory must first prove that the known universe would not exist without the pre-existence of consciousness as being an integral component of the universe as a whole, and that without the existence of consciousness the physical universe would not exist. I am an atheist by the way.