The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Should we ban geoengineering?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Should we ban geoengineering?

  • 1 Replies
  • 3190 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline smart (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2459
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 38 times
    • Website
Should we ban geoengineering?
« on: 21/06/2016 13:19:36 »
Why is the precautionary principle doesn't apply to climate engineering? There's multiple evidences that geoengineering may damage the environment and harm public health. Furthermore, in absence of scientific consensus on geoengineering activity, I think it might be wise to prohibit geoengineering on a global scale.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precautionary_principle
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 



Offline smart (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2459
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 38 times
    • Website
Re: Should we ban geoengineering?
« Reply #1 on: 07/07/2016 12:01:57 »
The prohibition of clandestine geoengineering activity is necessary for preventing additional damage to the ozone hole and disclosing the evidences of aluminium nanoparticles neurotoxicity. Furthermore, the voodoo science of climate engineering must be investigated to forbid the research and development of weaponized aerosols and nanoparticles with a particle-size distribution adapted for biological delivery.
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.755 seconds with 26 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.