[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

Here's a video I made to help explain my theory I posted before:

[jerrygg38]

Here's a video I made to help explain my theory I posted before:


1https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYXXinW_w7w

Wouldn't it be better if you gave us a brief description of your theory to get people interested in your video. I for one would not want to both looking at a video before I had some idea what it was about.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

Hi Jerry, here's the text to the video in case anyone is interested:


A quark is a particle of extremely dense space time
Its density puts a squeezing effect on the surrounding space time that it exists in
The squeezing effect creates its gravity field and is stronger the closer to the quark
A planet creates a gravity field of its own from the astronomical number of quarks in the planet
When the Edge of a quark’s gravity field and the edge of a planet’s gravity field touch the gravity field of the quark is squeezed on its edge
This pulls the quark in the direction of the planet’s gravity field
The quark is continuously pulled in as the lavers of space time are denser the closer to the planet

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

If you'll notice in the drawing in the video, the space-time of the gravity field around the planet and the quark can be looked at as a 2 dimensional perspective drawing of the ball on a large sheet experiment that causes other objects placed on the sheet to slide towards the ball as well as a 3 dimensional representation of the idea of space-time becoming denser when acted on by the planet or the quark, both ideas look the same when you draw them on paper.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

does this proves that the description is how gravity works and what quarks are made of?

[Colin2B]

does this proves that the description is how gravity works and what quarks are made of?

No, what you are offering is only conjecture not a proof.
You need to devise and carry out a series of experiments that would demonstrate that your ideas are correct.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

this is significant also in solving why two objects of different mass fall to earth at the same speed

[nilak]

Your video seems to show what a quark is. You still keep the GR concept of gravity as curved spacetime. However, your quark looks weird. In GR, energy (therefore matter and light) curves spacetime. Your model shows a spacetime curvature that exists without any cause, but I don't think it is impossible, in principle, but quarks have other features that show they shouldn't be just free space, like mass, charge and 1/2 spin.

I have posted a brief description of some features of gravity that I think are very important, but these should be discussed on a separate thread.
https://dwgtheory.quora.com/A-hypothesis-on-how-gravity-works [Links inactive - To make links active and clickable, login or click here to register]

You've shown your hypothesis on how a planet generates gravity and it is true that most of the constituents of a planet are quarks, but in fact most of the gravity generated by an atom comes from quarks energy not from quarks rest mass.

How do you think light generates gravity?

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

Your video seems to show what a quark is. You still keep the GR concept of gravity as curved spacetime. However, your quark looks weird. In GR, energy (therefore matter and light) curves spacetime. Your model shows a spacetime curvature that exists without any cause, but I don't think it is impossible, in principle, but quarks have other features that show they shouldn't be just free space, like mass, charge and 1/2 spin.

I have posted a brief description of some features of gravity that I think are very important, but these should be discussed on a separate thread.
https://dwgtheory.quora.com/A-hypothesis-on-how-gravity-works [Links inactive - To make links active and clickable, login or click here to register]

You've shown your hypothesis on how a planet generates gravity and it is true that most of the constituents of a planet are quarks, but in fact most of the gravity generated by an atom comes from quarks energy not from quarks rest mass.

How do you think light generates gravity?

this is a post I made earlier that fully describes the theory https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=67254.msg490170#msg490170

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

Your video seems to show what a quark is. You still keep the GR concept of gravity as curved spacetime. However, your quark looks weird. In GR, energy (therefore matter and light) curves spacetime. Your model shows a spacetime curvature that exists without any cause, but I don't think it is impossible, in principle, but quarks have other features that show they shouldn't be just free space, like mass, charge and 1/2 spin.

I have posted a brief description of some features of gravity that I think are very important, but these should be discussed on a separate thread.
https://dwgtheory.quora.com/A-hypothesis-on-how-gravity-works [Links inactive - To make links active and clickable, login or click here to register]

You've shown your hypothesis on how a planet generates gravity and it is true that most of the constituents of a planet are quarks, but in fact most of the gravity generated by an atom comes from quarks energy not from quarks rest mass.

How do you think light generates gravity?

I was earlier thinking the idea that the spin would create an area around the quark where space time was crushed by the super dense quark passing through it and it was this region of crushed space time that sort of radiated the squeezing effect of a gravity field.
As for the weight of electrons I believe that north and south magnetic poles prove there is a magnetic energy lining space time. the weight of an electron squeezing on this lining creates the effect of gravity and that light is a squeezing on the grid itself not a pressure on both space and time as electrons are before there mass is converted to light.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

The resilience from the squeezing of the outer layers of two objects gravity fields touching, is dependent on the mass of those two objects and hence which one has the more attractive force.