0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Does the anti-photon exist?
As I see it, a positron is similar to an electron but opposite polarity.
The electron and the positron will destroy each other and two photons will result. If the result was a photon and an anti-photon simultaneously then they would tend to destroy each other and the result would be nothing at all. So it is self-evident that two ordinary photons are produced.
When a proton encounters its antiparticle (and more generally, if any species of baryon encounters any species of antibaryon), the reaction is not as simple as electron-positron annihilation. Unlike an electron, a proton is a composite particle consisting of three "valence quarks" and an indeterminate number of "sea quarks" bound by gluons. Thus, when a proton encounters an antiproton, one of its constituent valence quarks may annihilate with an antiquark, while the remaining quarks and antiquarks will undergo rearrangement into a number of mesons (mostly pions and kaons), which will fly away from the annihilation point. The newly created mesons are unstable, and will decay in a series of reactions that ultimately produce nothing but gamma rays, electrons, positrons, and neutrinos. This type of reaction will occur between any baryon (particle consisting of three quarks) and any antibaryon (consisting of three antiquarks). Antiprotons can and do annihilate with neutrons, and likewise antineutrons can annihilate with protons, as discussed below.
The big problem is that the experiment takes place in our galaxy. It is my opinion that the production of the photons is modified by the gravitational field they are in. -
Thus an anti-photon that is produced will automatically switch to align itself to the present gravitational field.
The production in an antimatter galaxy would produce two anti-photons.
The difference between them is merely their geometric construction.
Do we have antimatter galaxies? It is possible. Anti-Photons emitted by the antimatter galaxy ..
would automatically switch to regular photons when they enter our galaxy.
I think you should read this: scienceconfession.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/theory-of-gravity-light-and-empty-space/PS: photon doesn't exist
Quote from: jerrygg38Does the anti-photon exist?No. I.e. the anti-photon is identical to the photon itself.What exactly do you think that an anti-photon is anyway? All particles, whether they are particles or anti-particles, are defined by measureable properties, such as charge, spin, magnetic moment, baryon number, lepton number, etc. Huh? What do you mean by "geometric construction"? Thanks for the information. I have no definite opinions concerning anti-photons and antimatter. I have not put them in my books, and from what you say it doesn't pay for me to spend much time on them. The question you ask about geometric construction refers to the photon and the possibly imaginary anti-photon as well. I have two forms of light. Photons are a quantum of photonic energy which is standard physics. Photonic energy also can be spheres of spherical energy in which the sphere is not photons in a group but a form of energy that is a sphere which flows at light speed and keeps expanding. Eventually a point will be reached where the energy of the sphere runs out or breaks apart into a minimum group of photons. That is a simple geometric shape. Now what does the photon itself look like? I have an electrical motor self propelled model. Positive electrical energy spins in one direction and negative electrical energy spins in the same direction. This will produce a zero net magnetic field in the front of the photon. the photon has an outer shell of positive energy and an inner shell of negative energy. This makes it especially attractive to the electron. A anti-photon if it existed would have the opposite geometric construction. The photon can be modulated to transmit electrical signals when in a fiber optic cable. It may very well be that the adaptable photon joins together as a chain of photonic energy although I have not given that much thought. In free space another model of the photon is a Doppler photon. This gets down to the problem of how large is a photon? An proton in general is as large as the universe because it is constantly radiating energy since its beginning. The photon likewise is part of energy that is constantly radiating. so we could say that a photon is also as large as the universe. This means that when you split a photon into two parts they really are interconnected sisters. So the strange experiments in which the sisters experience reactions at extremely high light speeds are due to the fact that the photons themselves are very large. we only see the tip of their existence. The Doppler photon has a tip of very small size but a tail that is huge. Length in the forward direction of travel is basically zero at light speed C and rearward size reaches toward infinity. so a photon is a strange thing. For the Doppler photon an anti photon would be hard to imagine.
Quote from: warpdrajv on 15/07/2016 00:46:57I think you should read this: scienceconfession.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/theory-of-gravity-light-and-empty-space/PS: photon doesn't existAnd since that URL leads to a page for which we don't know who wrote it, it's a waste of time reading it.
Quote from: warpdrajv on 15/07/2016 00:46:57I think you should read this: scienceconfession.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/theory-of-gravity-light-and-empty-space/PS: photon doesn't existEinstein won the Nobel prize for the photon I believe. Not for special relativity for sure. Exactly what the photon is, is subject to debate. Scientists can produce experiments which emit one photon at a time. It is a quantum of photonic energy. Many devices turn photons into electrical currents. If the photon does not exist then what do you propose interacts with various substances to produce heat or electrical currents? explain that in simple words and not web pages.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on 15/07/2016 13:51:20Quote from: warpdrajv on 15/07/2016 00:46:57I think you should read this: scienceconfession.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/theory-of-gravity-light-and-empty-space/PS: photon doesn't existEinstein won the Nobel prize for the photon I believe. Not for special relativity for sure. Exactly what the photon is, is subject to debate. Scientists can produce experiments which emit one photon at a time. It is a quantum of photonic energy. Many devices turn photons into electrical currents. If the photon does not exist then what do you propose interacts with various substances to produce heat or electrical currents? explain that in simple words and not web pages.Did you actually read what I wrote on that page?
Does the anti-photon exist? As specified in the science forum, current theory says that the photon is its own anti-photon. It is also believed that antiparticles react the same way in the gravitational field as regular particles. As I see it, a positron is similar to an electron but opposite polarity. The electron and the positron will destroy each other and two photons will result. If the result was a photon and an anti-photon simultaneously then they would tend to destroy each other and the result would be nothing at all. So it is self-evident that two ordinary photons are produced. The big problem is that the experiment takes place in our galaxy. It is my opinion that the production of the photons is modified by the gravitational field they are in. Thus an anti-photon that is produced will automatically switch to align itself to the present gravitational field. The production in an antimatter galaxy would produce two anti-photons. The difference between them is merely their geometric construction. Do we have antimatter galaxies? It is possible. Anti-Photons emitted by the antimatter galaxy would automatically switch to regular photons when they enter our galaxy. Particles from an antimatter galaxy would be repelled from the gravitational field of the matter galaxy. Otherwise we would get destruction at the edges of the antimatter galaxy when particles encounter a matter galaxy. Could there be an equal distribution of matter and antimatter galaxies? It is possible. Likewise there could only be a small number of antimatter galaxies. And when they collide with matter galaxies even though they tend to repel, there would be great areas of space where nothing exists. I do not know the answer. It is an interesting question. What do you guys think?
Quote from: PmbPhy on 15/07/2016 09:09:32Quote from: warpdrajv on 15/07/2016 00:46:57I think you should read this: scienceconfession.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/theory-of-gravity-light-and-empty-space/PS: photon doesn't existAnd since that URL leads to a page for which we don't know who wrote it, it's a waste of time reading it.There is my email address to prove I wrote it.
Quote from: warpdrajv on 15/07/2016 11:26:05Quote from: PmbPhy on 15/07/2016 09:09:32Quote from: warpdrajv on 15/07/2016 00:46:57I think you should read this: scienceconfession.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/theory-of-gravity-light-and-empty-space/PS: photon doesn't existAnd since that URL leads to a page for which we don't know who wrote it, it's a waste of time reading it.. An example are the two principles of the special theory of relativity (1) the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference and (2) the speed of light in empty space is constant, independent of the direction of propagation and the relative velocity between the source and the observer.<stop: I have to eat and sleep now. More later.> It appears to me that principle (1) is good for inertial frames where the speed of the frame is low as compared to the speed of light C. Thus we would have a very non-linear set of laws. In addition the laws within very high gravitational fields would be quite non-linear and you would not be able to specify our equations. So what does Einstein really mean by principle 1. Principle 2 specifies that photons act like constant speed motors (synchronous) except they move in a straight line. I have no objection to that except to say that the reference plane is the gravitational field and that the photon adapts from the suns field to the Earths field. thus when in the suns field it moves with C relative to the sun and when in the earths field it moves with C relative to the Earth. thus M/M experiment is meaningless.
Quote from: PmbPhy on 15/07/2016 09:09:32Quote from: warpdrajv on 15/07/2016 00:46:57I think you should read this: scienceconfession.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/theory-of-gravity-light-and-empty-space/PS: photon doesn't existAnd since that URL leads to a page for which we don't know who wrote it, it's a waste of time reading it.. An example are the two principles of the special theory of relativity (1) the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference and (2) the speed of light in empty space is constant, independent of the direction of propagation and the relative velocity between the source and the observer.<stop: I have to eat and sleep now. More later.>
But photons & anti-photons cannot destruct (because there is no smaller quantum particle to reduce to),
no smaller quantum particle