The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Does spin plus aether equal matter?

  • 60 Replies
  • 20448 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nilak

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 453
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 19 times
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #60 on: 12/10/2016 13:04:09 »
There are some true facts about spinning point particles but I have a different opinion.
You can build a  virtual world made of particles that don't spin on their own axis. Only add mass and gravity and they will start spinning around each other. However it doesn't mean particles don't spin in reality. It only means it is possible without spin. Plus particles like electrons show a behaviour as if they spin.

 I am investigating the possibility that space itself is a sort of aether. It seems to me that it has some elasticity, it can contract and dilate. But acording to GR spacetime actually does that. Every point in space, I suspect, has some properties. Mass might not be a property but only a different spacetime density.
When we look at light we see that magnetic field has a orientation. It means it can be any value, so it can be rotated. However it keeps its orientation while traveling. On the other hand, the electric field can have a different phase (circular
Polarization) and creates a twisting effect, but orientation doesn't change.
Space points can be seen as particles that don't move too much but only to allow dilation or contraction, like a perfect elastic skin.
The properties don't move from one point to another,  but the values  creating waves.
Electrons around atoms can bee seen as stationary waves. Every space point has a charge property. The charge creates electric field, which is simply values of charge  of each point spreading out. But the values spread out like pulling a certain amount, an infinitely long, perfect elastic band at speed c.
The quarks in an proton can be seen as waves of values spinning around each other.

I need to investigate how magnetic and electric field interract with each other and still be consistent with relativity, in this context.

Any wave needs fairly stationary positions  each one linked by the surrouning ones by a force inversely proportional  with the distance between them. I can't think of another possibility.
In our world, these points have a fixed number of overlaping and interacting properties.

These are only personal ideas/speculations. That's all.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.361 seconds with 26 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.