Man Snogs Dog

  • 2 Replies

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.



  • Guest
Man Snogs Dog
« on: 14/03/2007 16:50:56 »
OMAHA, Neb. -- Lucy was drowning.

The 10-month-old English bulldog had been drawn into the lake by resident ducks and Canada geese, and the icy water was paralyzing her.

When owner Randy Gurchin edged onto the ice and pulled Lucy from the water, she was unresponsive. Her face and paws were blue. 

So he did what he had been trained by the Air Force to do: mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

He closed her mouth, put his mouth over her nose, breathed air into her nostrils and down into her lungs and pushed on her chest.

Lucy began shallow breaths on her own after about a minute, he said.

He could have avoided having to snog the dog by using the Sylvester method,
(no it does not involve the use of a lisping cat    [:)] )
« Last Edit: 15/03/2007 15:02:47 by ROBERT »


Offline Carolyn

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 3761
    • View Profile
Re: Man Snogs Dog
« Reply #1 on: 14/03/2007 18:45:26 »
Lucky Lucy!  I once gave one of my puppies mouth to mouth after she almost drowned in our pool.  She lived, but we lost the other 5.  [:-'(]



  • Guest
Man Snogs Dog
« Reply #2 on: 19/03/2007 14:23:45 »
Drop 'kiss of life', urge medics   

Advising first-aiders to give the "kiss of life" is off-putting and unnecessary, say medics.
Not only are bystanders less likely to help someone who has collapsed if they have to do mouth-to-mouth ventilation, many are unable to perform it properly.

Chest compressions alone are just as good if not better in most cases, a Japanese study in The Lancet shows.

They recommend resuscitation trainers revise their advice. But the British Heart Foundation disagrees.

The current advice is to give mouth-to-mouth ventilation unless you are unable, or are unwilling.

'Yuk' factor

Studies show less than a third of people who collapse in public are helped by a bystander.

Surveys reveal many would-be first-aiders are put off by the idea of giving the kiss of life - for fear of catching an infectious disease, for example.

And when bystanders do assist, giving mouth-to-mouth can steal time from giving essential chest compressions.

Furthermore, if the patient has collapsed because of a heart rather than a lung problem they should already have enough oxygen in their body to keep them going without needing rescue breaths from a bystander.

Dr Ken Nagao and colleagues at the Surugadai Nihon University Hospital in Tokyo say in these circumstances it would be better for all parties to stick to giving chest compressions alone, which they called cardiac-only resuscitation.

Chest compressions 'key

They checked their theory by looking at the outcomes of more than 4,000 adult patients who had been helped by bystanders.

They found chest-compression-only resuscitation was the clear winner compared with conventional CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or mouth-to-mouth breathing together with chest compressions)