0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The string pulls against the rock and the gravitational field of the rock wants to move in a straight line.
In general you have to produce theories which are close to what the scientists believe.
You have millions of physicists in the world trying to understand the universe and produce theories.
How does your machine produce random chance?
The gravitational fields and the electromagnetic fields have a great deal of freedom and random chance.
You have a unique viewpoint for sure. But this necessitates space acting like a machine.
Hi Jerrygg38What is the Doppler space time and Doppler relativity? I have only heard about Doppler Effect...Your definition about forward mass and rearward mass looks correct but what is their meaning?
jerrygg38, If there is a medium to space it is unlikely to be a dot mass wave because a medium would restrict the dot not propel the dot. And why is the dot moving in the first place? Something moves the electron and the photon in a confounded manor. Change your dots to basically spinning stationary c and the propagation wave of that spin as dot resistance caused by the electron jump. The jump is the frequency and length hf of light or any other spectrum wave form not keeping up with c.
jerrygg38, You still have an effect without a cause. Einstein suggested you could not have motion in an Aether type special arrangement. I would agree because that would produce a preferred direction which violates relativity. The only energy state that does not violate relativity is a spin state of your dot particles. A wave being of the spin particles themselves. Nature makes the most out of the least. All we have are made from neutrons, protons and electrons. All mass might be made from just positrons and negatrons. And they might be made from micro mass in suns as fusion. If the sun was only made of coal and air it would only burn for 20 years. Rather then using up hydrogen it could be the creation of hydrogen from micro mass energy. Removing energy spin by fusion itself. The standard claim of a BB to create mass short circuits answers that are holistic. Sometimes it is our prejudice that drive us to inaccurate conclusions or stop us from different paths.
We have no answer for how the universe came to be. To me it is an oscillating space time entity that always existed for billions of billions of cycles forever. What was the first cause? Who knows?
Who made my dot-waves?
The same cause that made the universe. Why does dot-waves move at velocity C? Same reason. It the BB the right answer? Perhaps, perhaps not. Is there a better answer or another answer? Who knows? Has science been on a wrong path? Perhaps. Or has science only been slightly off course? So we are on a ship going into the unknown. We are in Einstein's elevator and we want to know what lies ahead. To me the BB is basically correct. To others it is not. However eventually man will know the truth.
Two protons moving toward each other at near C, will have a relative velocity of almost 2C and not C. That is just common sense. No brains required.
But Einstein would have people believe that C+C =C. So relativity is quite flawed. Despite its flaws Einstein has produced good results for many things
You cannot put all your eggs in the Einsteinian basket.
The big bang theory has produced many good results
and quantum mechanics has produced other good results.
This leads you to view the universe from a singular theory.
You have to take a bite of all the fruits.