The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Would a water droplet retain its round shape in microgravity?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Would a water droplet retain its round shape in microgravity?

  • 5 Replies
  • 2234 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mrsmith2211 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 168
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 11 times
    • View Profile
Would a water droplet retain its round shape in microgravity?
« on: 27/10/2016 01:34:54 »
So my late night thoughts started with a water balloon. If the water balloon was spinning really fast and hit the ground I would think the water progresses due to inertia in a straight line path to the ground.

Now I have seen videos of guys in outer space under low g situations able to play with a water blob due to surface tension like a ping pong ball.

My guess a water blob would hold it's circular shape in 0 g in spite of spin.

so this would men centrifugal or centripetal forces do not apply in 0 gravity.

Does that mean a Centrifuge does not work in 0 G? Or if you had a centrifuge in low g and suddenly stopped it would the heavier elements end up on the side instead of the bottom?

Which leads me to a bigger question, why are we drawn towards the center of the earth rather than being spun off the earth?



« Last Edit: 11/11/2016 08:32:40 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5272
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 439 times
    • View Profile
Re: Water gravity centripudal centrifugal confusion
« Reply #1 on: 27/10/2016 04:05:16 »
Quote from: mrsmith2211 on 27/10/2016 01:34:54
So my late night thoughts started with a water balloon. If the water balloon was spinning really fast and hit the ground I would think the water progresses due to inertia in a straight line path to the ground.
If you are thinking that the balloon would burst and release the water then individual droplets e.g. at the circumference, would travel tangentially and then being pulled down by gravity (an acceleration) would follow a curve to the ground.

Quote from: mrsmith2211 on 27/10/2016 01:34:54
My guess a water blob would hold it's circular shape in 0 g in spite of spin.
Circular yes, spherical no.

Quote from: mrsmith2211 on 27/10/2016 01:34:54
so this would men centrifugal or centripetal forces do not apply in 0 gravity.
Not true

Quote from: mrsmith2211 on 27/10/2016 01:34:54
Does that mean a Centrifuge does not work in 0 G? Or if you had a centrifuge in low g and suddenly stopped it would the heavier elements end up on the side instead of the bottom?
A centrifuge should work normally in space - unless the motor has failed!

Quote from: mrsmith2211 on 27/10/2016 01:34:54
Which leads me to a bigger question, why are we drawn towards the center of the earth rather than being spun off the earth?
Err ..... gravity?
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 

Offline jerrygg38

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1032
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 33 times
    • View Profile
Re: Water gravity centripudal centrifugal confusion
« Reply #2 on: 29/10/2016 14:21:25 »
mrsmith asked
Which leads me to a bigger question, why are we drawn towards the center of the earth rather than being spun off the earth?
  If the Earth was spinning at a huge velocity we would be flying off.
  So the force of gravity mg = m 32ft/sec/sec. is much less than
mV^2/R
V= 24,000miles/24 hours =1000 miles /hour = 0.277 miles per second
This equals 52.46E-6 ft per second. then we square this and divide by the radius of the Earth of approx 3000 miles = 15.84E6 ft
Thus the centrifugal acceleration  is 1.5E-17 verses 32 for gravity.
   So unless I have a calculation error, the force to spin us of the Earth is so tiny that it is meaningless.
Logged
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 9190
  • Activity:
    73.5%
  • Thanked: 917 times
    • View Profile
Re: Water gravity centripudal centrifugal confusion
« Reply #3 on: 29/10/2016 22:50:43 »
Quote
Does that mean a Centrifuge does not work in 0 G?
I hope not!
That would mean that 2001 Space Odyssey and The Martian made an error in their science (apart from the huge, glaring ones!).

But seriously, spacecraft designers are concerned about the effects of microgravity on human skeleton and muscles during a mission to Mars (for example), where the explorers would need to stand on their own two feet once they arrived there, without extensive medical staff to help them.

One of the possible approaches is a spinning spacecraft - perhaps two capsules, spinning on opposite ends of a tether?
Logged
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5272
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 439 times
    • View Profile
Re: Water gravity centripudal centrifugal confusion
« Reply #4 on: 30/10/2016 00:04:45 »
Quote from: evan_au on 29/10/2016 22:50:43
....perhaps two capsules, spinning on opposite ends of a tether?
I'm told that's a load of bolas
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 



Offline jerrygg38

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1032
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 33 times
    • View Profile
Re: Water gravity centripudal centrifugal confusion
« Reply #5 on: 30/10/2016 14:35:34 »
   The simple solution is for the spacecraft to have a constant acceleration for half the trip and a constant deceleration for the last part of the trip. Of course this would require advanced engine design would could take two partially radioactive ingredients into an atomic furnace plus the proper electromagnetic and photonic fields to produce photonic emissions. That is for the future however.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

How do roots growing in water differ from roots growing in soil?

Started by neilepBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 3
Views: 13847
Last post 11/06/2018 06:18:32
by pradeepkumar
Which weighs more, a litre of ice or a litre of water?

Started by The ScientistBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 24
Views: 28549
Last post 05/02/2021 20:17:35
by charles1948
Why is it that I don't normally feel the cold but can't get into cold water?

Started by thedocBoard Cells, Microbes & Viruses

Replies: 4
Views: 15716
Last post 19/03/2020 15:03:54
by Paul25
When salty water freezes, why is the ice not salty?

Started by chrisBoard Chemistry

Replies: 9
Views: 10565
Last post 01/11/2019 16:34:08
by alancalverd
After how long does water "go off" and become unsafe to drink?

Started by paul.frBoard General Science

Replies: 9
Views: 13565
Last post 07/10/2020 08:47:55
by jiraporn66
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.167 seconds with 48 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.