The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. Radiation, safe levels of
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Radiation, safe levels of

  • 22 Replies
  • 14716 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31102
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Radiation, safe levels of
« Reply #20 on: 26/03/2007 20:59:05 »
You might want to look into a therory called hormesis. It's a bit contraversial but it says that low level exposure is beneficial because it stimulates the body's defense mechanisms.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline iko

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1624
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Radiation, safe levels of
« Reply #21 on: 26/03/2007 23:16:01 »
Hi B.Chemist,
I think I am just fine with the 'background noise' of natural radiation, radon, cosmic radiations and UltraViolet rays to get older and crappier!
By the way, did you read that in Chernobyl there were 59 dead people in the end?
Not to mean that it wasn't an horrible disaster, but I thought that thousands had succumbed.
Talking of correct information!

ikod
« Last Edit: 26/03/2007 23:19:38 by iko »
Logged
ikod icon: http://d2993411.u58.surftown.nu/images/Aalesund2.jpg
http://img234.echo.cx/img234/659/25917wa.gif
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31102
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Radiation, safe levels of
« Reply #22 on: 27/03/2007 21:03:43 »
Yes, I saw that and I think it was mainly the firefighters who died as a result of trying to solve a problem that they hadn't caused and knowing that it might kill them. It seems only fair to me to point out that while the Soviet Union had some really bad polictics it had some truly fine people.
BTW, I seem to recall that some recent research on "conan the bacterium"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deinococcus_radiodurans
 has cast doubts on the model of radiation damage too.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.066 seconds with 29 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.