The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. How credible are the translations of the Sumerian Clay Tablets?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How credible are the translations of the Sumerian Clay Tablets?

  • 6 Replies
  • 11762 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Brian Jacobs

  • Guest
How credible are the translations of the Sumerian Clay Tablets?
« on: 20/12/2016 09:44:24 »
Brian Jacobs  asked the Naked Scientists:
   
I have the following questions that I am seeking answers for and the answer o the first question will really inform whether or how the other questions are answered:
 
How credible are the translations of the Sumerian Clay Tablets e.g. the Sumerian King List which list 149 Kings and apparently spans about 240 000 years?

Can the Sumerian Clay translations of Zecharia Sitchin be verified/validated and just how credible are these translations?

Is it true that active genes only comprise of 3% of the total DNA in our chromosomes and what then is the function of the 97% "inactive" genes/
 
I look forward to hearing the answers or views on the issues being raised.
 
Regards,
 
Brian. H. Jacobs
What do you think?
« Last Edit: 20/12/2016 09:44:24 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: How credible are the translations of the Sumerian Clay Tablets?
    « Reply #1 on: 30/12/2016 13:03:25 »
    Quote from: Brian Jacobs  on 20/12/2016 09:44:24
    Brian Jacobs  asked the Naked Scientists:
    Can the Sumerian Clay translations of Zecharia Sitchin be verified/validated and just how credible are these translations?
    I would suggest not very credible at all https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zecharia_Sitchin

    I would suggest you post the 2nd part of your question in the Physiology and Medicine section
    Logged
    and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
    the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
     

    Offline syhprum

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 5198
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 74 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: How credible are the translations of the Sumerian Clay Tablets?
    « Reply #2 on: 03/01/2017 01:11:27 »
    These wild fantasies make "worlds in collision" seem almost sensible in comparison
    Logged
     

    Offline zx16

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • 247
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 8 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: How credible are the translations of the Sumerian Clay Tablets?
    « Reply #3 on: 07/02/2017 00:06:37 »
    Why believe anything in a Sumerian clay tablet?  It's obviously pre-scientific bollocks.
    Logged
     

    Offline alancalverd

    • Global Moderator
    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • ********
    • 21159
    • Activity:
      72.5%
    • Thanked: 60 times
    • Life is too short for instant coffee
  • Best Answer
  • Re: How credible are the translations of the Sumerian Clay Tablets?
    « Reply #4 on: 07/02/2017 15:31:07 »
    The only people who can vouch for the validity of the translation are Sumerians but (a) they don't speak English and (b) they are all dead, so the answer is "not at all".
    Logged
    Helping stem the tide of ignorance
     



    Offline jeffreyH

    • Global Moderator
    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ********
    • 6996
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 192 times
    • The graviton sucks
  • Best Answer
  • Re: How credible are the translations of the Sumerian Clay Tablets?
    « Reply #5 on: 07/02/2017 17:39:48 »
    When Michael Ventris deciphered linear b he had the advantage of not only bringing scholars together to share knowledge but also an eye for patterns that pointed to the Greek language. He was also multi-lingual. These advantages would not be enough to decipher Sumerian. You could just make anything up.
    Logged
    Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
     

    Offline zx16

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • 247
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 8 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: How credible are the translations of the Sumerian Clay Tablets?
    « Reply #6 on: 09/02/2017 17:16:11 »
    Don't you think the only reason that Michael Ventris is still remembered, is simply this: because he named the script that he supposedly deciphered:  "LINEAR-B".
    That name resonates so strongly, that he's been immortalised.  If he'd called the script anything else, he'd be forgotten.


    « Last Edit: 09/02/2017 17:20:02 by zx16 »
    Logged
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.543 seconds with 42 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.