The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. A classical photon model attempt
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

A classical photon model attempt

  • 0 Replies
  • 2436 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nilak (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 453
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 19 times
A classical photon model attempt
« on: 28/12/2016 14:19:36 »
      In the attached file you will see a simple idea of a classical photon in a spin 1 state. As predicted by QM photons are not simple electromagnetic waves instead they seem to be  structures of ectromagnetic waves of the same frequency ( there is a slight spectrum variation but that is insignificant). Any photon has an intrinsic CW or CCW spin after it has been generated. If two photons one CW the other CCW combine they will form a higher energy photon carrying both CW and CCW angular momentum at the same time by a classical superposition.

Notes.1) In fig 10 the blue line is the petal corresponding to the horizontal filter.
            2) In QM you can't combine photons or split them. However, nothing prevents that in reality. Only emissions and absorbtions (after stabilization on an orbital) are quantitized.  Classical EM waves can easily do that.

P.S. I’ve realised the previous  model was wrong because, first of all, it didn’t use the vector addition correctly.
« Last Edit: 29/12/2016 12:26:08 by Nilak »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.618 seconds with 25 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.