The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. How much can a gamma knife, or X-ray beam be collimated.
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How much can a gamma knife, or X-ray beam be collimated.

  • 3 Replies
  • 4963 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Timemachine1 (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
How much can a gamma knife, or X-ray beam be collimated.
« on: 18/01/2017 00:38:53 »
Or focused to ionize neurons in the brain at micron cubic ranges.[/size]I have been told that gamma beams cannot work with ball lenses, but X-rays, and other electromagnetic radiation, I am unsure about.how much can gamma knife beams be collimated without using ball lenses.What would be the smallest cubic area in the brain you could ionize, without gamma beams passing through a ball lens.Can you tell me the effects for X-Rays, and other electromagnetic radiation, if they can pass through a ball lens or not.If you can ionize neurons at micron scales you can stop the spread of Parkinson's disease throughout the brain.It would be tricky, and complex, but not impossible.You could probably erase memories specifically in an animal also, with this technique.Thank you for your help with this question. ;D [/color]
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21155
  • Activity:
    73.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: How much can a gamma knife, or X-ray beam be collimated.
« Reply #1 on: 18/01/2017 01:02:00 »
You cannot focus gamma or hard x-rays. Selective diffraction can increase the local intensity of soft x-radiation  but it is of no use therapeutically. You can cook a 1 mm sphere fairly accurately with a Cyberknife but only at a depth of about 1 cm inside the brain.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: How much can a gamma knife, or X-ray beam be collimated.
« Reply #2 on: 21/01/2017 18:25:56 »
As long as you are prepared to put up with huge inefficiencies, you can collimate a gamma ray beam.
If you drilled a 1 micron diameter hole through a metre thick lead block and put a very intense gamma source behind it, you would get a beam that only diverged by a micron or so over the course of a metre.

It would need a phenomenally powerful source to achieve anything because only about 1 in ten million million gamma photons would go through the hole.

What good would it do you?
Well, not a lot because as soon as the beam hit anything- like the skin or the skull- it would start to spread out.
By the time it got into the brain it wouldn't be a 1 micron wide beam any more.
That's why this idea has never been used in practice, and never will be.

Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3902
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 126 times
Re: How much can a gamma knife, or X-ray beam be collimated.
« Reply #3 on: 02/02/2017 14:32:15 »
Quote from: Timemachine1 on 18/01/2017 00:38:53
Or focused to ionize neurons in the brain at micron cubic ranges.[/size]I have been told that gamma beams cannot work with ball lenses, but X-rays, and other electromagnetic radiation, I am unsure about.how much can gamma knife beams be collimated without using ball lenses.What would be the smallest cubic area in the brain you could ionize, without gamma beams passing through a ball lens.Can you tell me the effects for X-Rays, and other electromagnetic radiation, if they can pass through a ball lens or not.If you can ionize neurons at micron scales you can stop the spread of Parkinson's disease throughout the brain.It would be tricky, and complex, but not impossible.You could probably erase memories specifically in an animal also, with this technique.Thank you for your help with this question. ;D [/color]
I don't know about gamma rays but I do know about x-rays. In fact the Chandra X-Ray Observatory which is currently in orbit collimates X-Rays does this. See:
http://chandra.harvard.edu/about/
Quote
Chandra carries four very sensitive mirrors nested inside each other. The energetic X-rays strike the insides of the hollow shells and are focussed onto electronic detectors at the end of the 9.2- m (30-ft.) optical bench. Depending on which detector is used, very detailed images or spectra of the cosmic source can be made and analyzed.

I actually worked on this telescope. I worked at MIT in a lab where the CCDs were being calibrated. I was a technician there.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.383 seconds with 35 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.