The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Jeffrey :
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Jeffrey :

  • 7 Replies
  • 3191 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest39538

  • Guest
Jeffrey :
« on: 07/05/2017 13:14:30 »
A xyzt matrice/matrix made of a negative situate field.

At the center of the matrice/matrix a single ''spark''

The +q has to travel up the ''wire'' attracted to the whole of the ''neg wire''?

* matrix1.jpg (26.3 kB, 1003x505 - viewed 194 times.)
Logged
 



Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
Re: Jeffrey :
« Reply #1 on: 07/05/2017 17:23:08 »
Take a look at this. It contains a series of questions to be answered. Knowing the right question to ask is important.
https://wsscience.wikispaces.com/file/view/IB+Physics+Review+-Electrostatics+and+Fields.pdf

NOTE: The answers are at the bottom of the PDF.
« Last Edit: 07/05/2017 17:30:31 by jeffreyH »
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Marked as best answer by on 17/08/2024 04:10:02

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Jeffrey :
« Reply #2 on: 08/05/2017 00:46:58 »
Quote from: jeffreyH on 07/05/2017 17:23:08
Take a look at this. It contains a series of questions to be answered. Knowing the right question to ask is important.
https://wsscience.wikispaces.com/file/view/IB+Physics+Review+-Electrostatics+and+Fields.pdf

NOTE: The answers are at the bottom of the PDF.

Did you know that question 1 in your link has insufficient information to plot the path because it does not give a speed.  If the object is travelling a speed greater than force of attraction the object will travel in a straight line and not follow a curvature path.

However I will use your questions to ask  my original question. 

This question is about the attraction  of opposite polarities in electric and magnetic fields.

The diagram shows  a vacuum  that the entire volume consists of negative charge, to represent negative I used 0.

At the center of the diagram I have placed a positive charge,

Is the positive charge attracted to the whole of the volume ? i.e it permeates isotropic

Could this scenario be extended to that the negative field is the ''Aether'' we seek?


* pos.jpg (23 kB, 1003x505 - viewed 176 times.)
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Jeffrey :
« Reply #3 on: 08/05/2017 01:12:13 »
This question is about the attraction of opposite polarities in electric and magnetic fields in a vacuum.

If the volume of a vacuum consisted of solely a negative polarity field, at the center of the vacuum manifested a single positive charge.

Would the positive charge be attracted to the whole of the vacuums negative field and permeate isotropic using the negative field as the ''Aether'' ?
Logged
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: Jeffrey :
« Reply #4 on: 08/05/2017 08:37:12 »
Quote from: Thebox on 08/05/2017 00:46:58
If the object is travelling a speed greater than force of attraction the object will travel in a straight line and not follow a curvature path.
Speed and force are different things, so that statement is incorrect.
The path will always be curved no matter what the speed, but at higher speeds the curvature will be smaller.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Jeffrey :
« Reply #5 on: 08/05/2017 12:05:30 »
Quote from: Colin2B on 08/05/2017 08:37:12
Quote from: Thebox on 08/05/2017 00:46:58
If the object is travelling a speed greater than force of attraction the object will travel in a straight line and not follow a curvature path.
Speed and force are different things, so that statement is incorrect.
The path will always be curved no matter what the speed, but at higher speeds the curvature will be smaller.
I know force and speed are different.

The path will not always be curved that is why we have an escape velocity. It takes precise calculations to retain an orbit.
You never heard of a slingshot around the moon giving the rocket enough momentum to escape the gravitational hold?
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Jeffrey :
« Reply #6 on: 09/05/2017 14:43:39 »
added - diagram

* neg field.jpg (40.1 kB, 1003x505 - viewed 329 times.)
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Jeffrey :
« Reply #7 on: 09/05/2017 15:03:38 »
I have thought of an experiment to either prove or disprove the ''aether field'' exists and my notions are correct or incorrect. (an actual physical experiment).
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.279 seconds with 40 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.