The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 58 59 [60]   Go Down

If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?

  • 1188 Replies
  • 478957 Views
  • 8 Tags

Bogie_smiles and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Bogie_smiles (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1456
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 118 times
  • Science Enthusiast: Be cheerful; be careful.
Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?
« Reply #1180 on: 27/08/2025 19:17:26 »
So, feel free to give some thought to the entirety of space and time, and give your opinion (actually post some specific conclusion you are willing to make) that can help us make sense of the possibility that there are an infinite number of possibilities at all times, under an infinite number of suns across unbounded space (given unbounded speculation of course).




438974,438998,
« Last Edit: 27/08/2025 19:35:45 by Bogie_smiles »
Logged
Layman Science Enthusiast
 



Online Bogie_smiles (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1456
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 118 times
  • Science Enthusiast: Be cheerful; be careful.
Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?
« Reply #1181 on: 27/08/2025 21:23:32 »
In other words, the universe is the ultimate perpetual motion machine.

And does anyone agree that it has always been that way.  I suppose there are some who raise questions about using the word "always" in reference to the universe; and I might add, in reference to an infinite universe that has always existed.

Maybe some members think of the universe as having come from nothingness.  Maybe self-generated by an empty void? 

Maybe, given an infinite past, someone posits that our universe today came from nothing, no space or time or energy?

I don't think so :) .            Do you?




439000,439066,
« Last Edit: 27/08/2025 22:22:44 by Bogie_smiles »
Logged
Layman Science Enthusiast
 

Online Bogie_smiles (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1456
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 118 times
  • Science Enthusiast: Be cheerful; be careful.
Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?
« Reply #1182 on: 27/08/2025 22:44:39 »
However, over a couple of hundred million years, I could imagine that the matter and energy, and their chemistry together, could combine in advantagous ways, to allow life to emerge. And given enough of those places across the universe, circumstances like we have on Earth could arise, and if so, well, here we are, lol.




439103,439125,439181,
« Last Edit: 28/08/2025 00:51:19 by Bogie_smiles »
Logged
Layman Science Enthusiast
 

Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2403
  • Activity:
    5.5%
  • Thanked: 1014 times
Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?
« Reply #1183 on: 28/08/2025 01:25:03 »
Quote from: Bogie_smiles on 27/08/2025 18:06:38
I don't think there is much question about it; the universe has always existed and there have been big bangs going on, here and there, across all of that infinite space and infinite time.
Oddly enough, I agree with that.

Quote
So I don't have any trouble using "infinite and eternal" as two of the main descriptors of the universe; let's say the pillars of infinity, i.e., no beginning, no possibility of an end to it all, and really no way of knowing the truth/reality of it all.
And that as well. The position is a philosophical one, and as such, there is by definition no way of knowing the truth/reality of it.

Quote
... no way of knowing the truth/reality of it no end to finite patches of life in a potentially infinite number of places across all of that space and time.
Entropy kind of has other ideas about that one.
Logged
 

Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2403
  • Activity:
    5.5%
  • Thanked: 1014 times
Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?
« Reply #1184 on: 28/08/2025 01:29:44 »
Making a lot of posts today, no?  Living for that number on the bottom perhaps?


Quote from: Bogie_smiles on 27/08/2025 19:17:26
So, feel free to give some thought to the entirety of space and time, and give your opinion (actually post some specific conclusion you are willing to make) that can help us make sense of the possibility that there are an infinite number of possibilities at all times, under an infinite number of suns across unbounded space (given unbounded speculation of course)
OK.  There seems to be a finite number of possible configurations of things.  Sure, the universe is largely considered to be infinite in expanse, so given the finite configurations, they have no choice but to be repeated, which means there's exact copies of us (not just you, since the copy would not be exact without everybody else being copied as well) some finite distance away, a distance that has been computed.


Quote from: Bogie_smiles on 27/08/2025 21:23:32
In other words, the universe is the ultimate perpetual motion machine.
Sort of.  Things in motion tend to slow, but never actually stop.  After a while they stop being 'things' anymore, and radiation doesn't stop, its energy just fades away.

Quote
Maybe some members think of the universe as having come from nothingness.  Maybe self-generated by an empty void?
I suppose some might. Not many members here, so reasonable chance that none of the active ones would support that.
« Last Edit: 28/08/2025 05:01:22 by Halc »
Logged
 



Online Bogie_smiles (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1456
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 118 times
  • Science Enthusiast: Be cheerful; be careful.
Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?
« Reply #1185 on: 28/08/2025 01:46:32 »
Quote from: Halc on 28/08/2025 01:25:03
Quote from: Bogie_smiles on 27/08/2025 18:06:38
I don't think there is much question about it; the universe has always existed and there have been big bangs going on, here and there, across all of that infinite space and infinite time.
Oddly enough, I agree with that.

Quote
So I don't have any trouble using "infinite and eternal" as two of the main descriptors of the universe; let's say the pillars of infinity, i.e., no beginning, no possibility of an end to it all, and really no way of knowing the truth/reality of it all.
And that as well. The position is a philosophical one, and as such, there is by definition no way of knowing the truth/reality of it.

Quote
... no way of knowing the truth/reality of it no end to finite patches of life in a potentially infinite number of places across all of that space and time.
Entropy kind of has other ideas about that one.
My way of thinking about entropy is that it is .......... bounded, periodic, repeats, etc, probably over lengthly time frames and unimaginably large but finite patches of the greater universe. And any finite patch of space is....  almost nothing, almost nowhere, almost never, relative to the infinite.




439229,440565,440691,441132,441269,441855,
« Last Edit: 30/08/2025 14:05:26 by Bogie_smiles »
Logged
Layman Science Enthusiast
 

Online Bogie_smiles (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1456
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 118 times
  • Science Enthusiast: Be cheerful; be careful.
Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?
« Reply #1186 on: 01/09/2025 17:21:57 »
The whole forum has had a recent jump in activity. Who knows the explanation for that, or is it my imagination?




445504,459836,474067,



« Last Edit: Today at 01:57:06 by Bogie_smiles »
Logged
Layman Science Enthusiast
 

Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2403
  • Activity:
    5.5%
  • Thanked: 1014 times
Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?
« Reply #1187 on: 04/09/2025 13:01:01 »
Quote from: Bogie_smiles on 01/09/2025 17:21:57
The whole forum has had a recent jump in activity. Who knows the explanation for that, or is it my imagination?
You did notice. It seems to be a bot attack originating from Asia

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=87399.0;topicseen
Logged
 

Online Bogie_smiles (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1456
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 118 times
  • Science Enthusiast: Be cheerful; be careful.
Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?
« Reply #1188 on: Today at 02:07:57 »
Quote from: Halc on 04/09/2025 13:01:01
Quote from: Bogie_smiles on 01/09/2025 17:21:57
The whole forum has had a recent jump in activity. Who knows the explanation for that, or is it my imagination?
You did notice. It seems to be a bot attack originating from Asia

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=87399.0;topicseen

It looks like things are back in order.  Still higher activity though. Lets give it a chance to normalize, and then pick back up on the "entropy" topic :shrug:


474147,478294,
« Last Edit: Today at 16:36:50 by Bogie_smiles »
Logged
Layman Science Enthusiast
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 58 59 [60]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: infinite spongy universe  / eternal intent  / pseudoscience  / speculation  / hypothesis  / isu model  / conformal cyclic cosmology  / sir roger penrose 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.176 seconds with 44 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.