The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Why do electrons move?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why do electrons move?

  • 1 Replies
  • 1496 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GoC (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 903
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 82 times
    • View Profile
Why do electrons move?
« on: 13/06/2017 11:36:56 »
?
Logged
 



Offline GoC (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 903
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 82 times
    • View Profile
Re: Why do electrons move?
« Reply #1 on: 13/06/2017 16:13:31 »
No answer I the correct answer so far. But what do we know. Really nothing. All we can do is use logic based on the experiences of others and ourselves. In my experience there are only three possibilities of which two are in my mind the least likely. Mechanical transfer, magic or God. So yes I chose mechanical transfer. Some suggest the atom stored its energy from the Big Bang. I consider the BB with magic so that is off the table for me. Lets look at motion itself from where does that come? Other motion of course. Fundamental motion would be energy. c is the constant so energy has a limit of c. Time is always measured by c because the electron cycle stays in step with c. The photons distance is always measured by a light second. How we measure distance is with light so it becomes somewhat circular logic in the first place. But the point is Fundamental Energy c is a limit for motion that our logic in the scientific community seems to agree. So we have time measurement and motion distance in a relationship with c energy potential. The energy potential c is greatest in the absence of mass. Is it logical to assume energy comes from mass if its greatest potential is in space with the absence of mass? I believe we have to call it as logic sees it. Energy is of space and not mass which brings us full circle. What causes motion in the atoms electron? Logic would suggest an energy structure to transfer motion to the electron and photon creation of a wave propagating through energy c. The spectrum of energy c would have many wave representations of particles making scientists suspect everything is a form of wave. Electrons do not travel through vector space at c but the representative beta wave does. So we have a possibility of a spectrum of energy controlling mass while space energy c bends to accommodate motion it causes to mass.

Physics does not care what man believes or does not believe.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.072 seconds with 35 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.