[Quantum Antigravity (OP)]

" Got a new theory on something?
Post your hypotheses here... "
                     
                       
Hello,     
     
I would like to present and discuss the
Experimental Quantum Antigravity HYPOTHESIS :
   
QuantumAntiGravity.wordpress.com/study-guide/
   
 

[Quantum Antigravity (OP)]

                 
The Experimental Quantum Antigravity HYPOTHESIS
postulates existence of :

" A hitherto unknown physical interaction
between any angular momentum 
and perpendicular magnetic and electric fields."
     
   
Theoretical grounds of the hypothesis
are the Minkowski’s equations
from the Abraham-Minkowski controversy :
 
QuantumAntiGravity.wordpress.com/abraham-minkowski/
   
The empirical basis of the hypothesis
is the Feigel effect  that stems from the Minkowski’s
equations, which was postulated by Prof. Alexander Feigel
in Physical Review Letters, 92, 020404,
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.020404
and that was also briefly summarized in the prestigious
scientific journal Nature :

Nature.com/news/2004/040126/full/news040126-19.html
   

[guest39538]

QuantumAntiGravity.wordpress.com/study-guide/

Ok, I have glanced at your link, but for clarity of your idea can you please summon up your idea in a single paragraph?

At this moment I am going off your title, I do feel I have enough knowledge and thinking ability to discuss your title .

I do believe myself that anti-gravity exists.  I feel the fundamental evidence lies within air.  You and everyone else on the planet will consider this as buoyancy, however I believe when the E entropy of air changes, this has affect on the gravity mechanism within the atom, increasing or decreasing the gravity magnitude potential.
I also believe the earth does not fall into the sun because likewise polarities stop this from happening, a sort of cushioned dampening field between bodies. If you can consider something falling from the sky that had a field surrounding it, when the object falls through a likewise field , the object will slow down and my basis for this is simply magnetic suspension, the object ''floats'' on the field, the object is not buoyant it is being repulsed by equal field polarities.

That is a little bit of thought from me about the anti-gravitational  properties of things like air that are ''buoyant'', I await your reply to ''see'' where you are at . 

[Quantum Antigravity (OP)]

I do believe myself that anti-gravity exists.  I feel the fundamental evidence lies within air.  You and everyone else on the planet will consider this as buoyancy, however I believe when the E entropy of air changes, this has affect on the gravity mechanism within the atom, increasing or decreasing the gravity magnitude potential.

I also believe the earth does not fall into the sun because likewise polarities stop this from happening, a sort of cushioned dampening field between bodies. If you can consider something falling from the sky that had a field surrounding it, when the object falls through a likewise field , the object will slow down and my basis for this is simply magnetic suspension, the object ''floats'' on the field, the object is not buoyant it is being repulsed by equal field polarities.

That is a little bit of thought from me about the anti-gravitational  properties of things like air that are ''buoyant''.

     

Does your above theory make testable predictions ? 
   
Maybe you would like to discuss your above theory in a separate topic?   

[Quantum Antigravity (OP)]

Ok, I have glanced at your link, but for clarity of your idea can you please summon up your idea in a single paragraph?

In order to meaningfully discuss my hypothesis,
glancing is not enough.     
   
Unfortunately, not every hypothesis can be summarized in a single paragraph.
In order to understand it, you need to read it, sorry.
   
I have already described the essence of my hypothesis in my post above ;
the second post from the top, if you have missed it. 

[guest39538]

A hitherto unknown physical interaction
between any angular momentum 
and perpendicular magnetic and electric fields.

Ok, I will try to get my head around your writing style and read it, it is important when in discussion to remind ourselves of ambiguity.
You say

A hitherto unknown physical interaction
between any angular momentum 
and perpendicular magnetic and electric fields.

If you are discussing an unknown and by the end of your ''conjecture'' it is still an unknown, then I do not believe you have anything of importance.  I will read and ''see'' if I can understand you.

[guest39538]

QuantumAntiGravity.wordpress.com/abraham-minkowski/

Ok I have read the first part .

You mention  Minkowski-Feigel effect.

The Abraham–Minkowski controversy is a physics debate concerning electromagnetic momentum within dielectric media. Traditionally, it is argued that in the presence of matter the electromagnetic stress-energy tensor by itself is not conserved (divergenceless). Only the total stress-energy tensor carries unambiguous physical significance, and how one apportions it between an “electromagnetic” part and a “matter” part depends on context and convenience.[1] In other words, the electromagnetic part and the matter part in the total momentum can be arbitrarily distributed as long as the total momentum is kept the same. There are two incompatible equations to describe momentum transfer between matter and electromagnetic fields.[2] These two equations were first suggested by Hermann Minkowski (1908)[3] and Max Abraham (1909),[4][5] from which the controversy's name derives. Both were claimed to be supported by experimental data. Theoretically, it is usually argued that Abraham version of momentum “does indeed represent the true momentum density of electromagnetic fields” for electromagnetic waves,[6] while Minkowski version of momentum is “pseudomomentum”[6] or “wave momentum”.[7]

This controversy inspired various theories admitting the existence of reactionless drives.[8][citation needed]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham%E2%80%93Minkowski_controversy

Ok I have stopped on reading this, it says there is two equation involved,

The two equations for the photon momentum are:

I stopped there because the information is false and the maths is calculated on subjective imagination of the use of the photon which are not factual proven to exist.
In simple terms you can't use that and anything based thereafter would be wrong.

[guest39538]

QUANTUM  ANTIGRAVITY

Gravity is neither a fundamental force, nor a spacetime curvature. There are no physical, empirically detectable graviton particles, for the same reason that there are no magneton particles of the magnetic field. Magnetons and gravitons are at best virtual particles only.

Completely wrong, gravity is the rudiment of the creation of all 4 states of matter.