[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

Space time is made up of an inactive field of a conductive grid, it only becomes active when energy acts on it. A second component of space time are blocks that line the grid. These void blocks, as I call them, are also made of an conductive grid much smaller and only become active when acted upon by matter.
 
The smallest particles of matter, such as protons and neutrons, are made of extremely dense substance of space time. Their density puts a squeezing force in the surrounding space time they exist in. The force is stronger the closer to the particle. This causes a gravity field. When a gravity field touches another gravity field, the same squeezing force of space time on space time applies and the larger gravity field squeezes on the weaker one pulling it harder. Both objects then move towards each other in proportion to there weight.
 
Electrons and energy are also a squeezing force on space-time. Electrons get caught in electron shells around atoms. They add weight to matter by squeezing on space time and giving the impression of gravity. When they convert into light there weight converts into momentum and the become a stress only on the conductive grid, not on void blocks. Magnetism is a flowing of space time and its field doesn't create gravity either. A magnet acts like a fan for the conductive grid of space, seen by the repulsion of two north or south ends. The electrons in the magnet all circle in the same direction which acts as the fan for the conductive grid.

[guest39538]

Space time is made up of an inactive conductive field in a grid structure, it only becomes active when energy acts on it. A second component of space time are blocks that line the grid. These void blocks, as I call them, are also made of an conductive grid much smaller and only become active when acted upon by matter.
 

You have to remove the grid reference, that is a bit suggestive to an intelligent design, you have to have an XYZ matrix of charge that A+B=C or q1+q2=N  to show 0 net charge.  q1 and q2 being entangled and acting as a single manifold constant.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

You have to remove the grid reference, that is a bit suggestive to an intelligent design, you have to have an XYZ matrix of charge that A+B=C or q1+q2=N  to show 0 net charge.  q1 and q2 being entangled and acting as a single manifold constant.

I'm not sure how this proves I'm wrong could you elaborate some more.

[guest39538]

You have to remove the grid reference, that is a bit suggestive to an intelligent design, you have to have an XYZ matrix of charge that A+B=C or q1+q2=N  to show 0 net charge.  q1 and q2 being entangled and acting as a single manifold constant.

I'm not sure how this proves I'm wrong could you elaborate some more.

I am not trying to prove you wrong , I was trying to help you. A grid implies space between the lines where a xyz matrix represents an entire volume.   A grid would be a design where an entirety would be natural.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

I'm not arguing that space has an ether in it. I think the idea of the ether was introduced because people could relate sound waves as being what like light waves  and gravity waves were like. Apart from saying conductive grid rather then energy grid, I stick with the OP. Space-time is a medium and waves travel as changes in density.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

The force spreading out from the small particles of super dense space-time is similar to thermal energy. Like an ice cube cooling a drink. density in space time would explain why it takes light an impossibly long time to travel out of the surface of a black hole. I don't agree with people misunderstanding that we will never see inside a black hole, no instrument could ever survive the entrance. It should just be obvious that it's a neutron star crunched even tighter, not some mystical place of dimensions.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

The conductive grid is similar to saying there is an ether which I've heard has been scientifically disproven. Does anybody know about Lorentz and the experiments that disproved the ether?

[GoC]

  The Michelson Morley experiment highly discounts the possibility of a stationary grid structure. I would have to agree with that assessment but that did not prove a grid made of points that spin in a complimentary fashion was disproven. We nave to account for energy to move the electrons. A spin grid of c complimentary points would satisfy that requirement and create relativity. Or continue on the path of magic rather than mechanical electron motion that is confounded with photon motion.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

The Michelson Morley experiment highly discounts the possibility of a stationary grid structure. I would have to agree with that assessment but that did not prove a grid made of points that spin in a complimentary fashion was disproven. We nave to account for energy to move the electrons. A spin grid of c complimentary points would satisfy that requirement and create relativity. Or continue on the path of magic rather than mechanical electron motion that is confounded with photon motion.

The morley michelson experiment seems silly to me. If its true that light propagates from its source at the same speed in every direction regardless of it reference frame then shouldn't that make light move its own speed plus the speed of the reference frame?

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

  The Michelson Morley experiment highly discounts the possibility of a stationary grid structure. I would have to agree with that assessment but that did not prove a grid made of points that spin in a complimentary fashion was disproven. We nave to account for energy to move the electrons. A spin grid of c complimentary points would satisfy that requirement and create relativity. Or continue on the path of magic rather than mechanical electron motion that is confounded with photon motion.

I've been discussing this. I have come to the conclusion that the split light beam in the Michelson Moorley experiment doesn't lose or gain momentum energy from the moving grid or ether because it returns on exactly the same path as it was sent out cancelling any momentum it gains or loses from it's moving through the ether. Measuring how fast the light gets to the END of each arm in the experiment would show which way the ether was moving in respect to the movement of the earth through a stationairy conductive grid or ether.

[Atkhenaken]

  The Michelson Morley experiment highly discounts the possibility of a stationary grid structure. I would have to agree with that assessment but that did not prove a grid made of points that spin in a complimentary fashion was disproven. We nave to account for energy to move the electrons. A spin grid of c complimentary points would satisfy that requirement and create relativity. Or continue on the path of magic rather than mechanical electron motion that is confounded with photon motion.

I've been discussing this. I have come to the conclusion that the split light beam in the Michelson Moorley experiment doesn't lose or gain momentum energy from the moving grid or ether because it returns on exactly the same path as it was sent out cancelling any momentum it gains or loses from it's moving through the ether. Measuring how fast the light gets to the END of each arm in the experiment would show which way the ether was moving in respect to the movement of the earth through a stationairy conductive grid or ether.

Airy's telescope experiments and Sagnac's experiment where he spins the interferometer at a rate of 2 revolutions per second creates the expected fringes.
The expectations of the Michelson/Morley experiment were that the Earth moves through the aether at 30 meters per second. They never considered that the aether pushes the Earth around the sun. The Michelson/Morley experiment found an aether speed of 10 meters per second. This experiment was called a null result because they didn't get what they were expecting. This is the speed that the aether enters the Earth. Its called gravity. 9.8m/sec. If the aether is travelling at the same speed as the Earth then of course, there wont be much wind.

Note - Ignore the religious content of this video.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

This is the speed that the aether enters the Earth. Its called gravity. 9.8m/sec. If the aether is travelling at the same speed as the Earth then of course, there wont be much wind.

I'm not sure you got that one right. why would the speed of the moving ether as relative to earth equate to gravity? The aether or conductive grid is stationairy and we're moving through it. Gravity is something entirely different.

[Atkhenaken]

I'm not sure you got that one right. why would the speed of the moving ether as relative to earth equate to gravity? The aether or conductive grid is stationairy and we're moving through it. Gravity is something entirely different.

Most of current physics is wrong. Space is not empty and the Earth and all the other planets are pushed around the sun by the aether. Note - All the planets move at the same relative speed according to there position and size. The conductive grid is not stationary. The universe is constantly expanding and contracting at the same time. Suns expand and create matter and black holes destroy matter back to aether again. Its a circular motion which is perpendicular the the galactic axis. Similar to magnetic forces which are tiny fractals of aethic forces and movements.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

I'm not sure you got that one right. why would the speed of the moving ether as relative to earth equate to gravity? The aether or conductive grid is stationairy and we're moving through it. Gravity is something entirely different.

Most of current physics is wrong. Space is not empty and the Earth and all the other planets are pushed around the sun by the aether. Note - All the planets move at the same relative speed according to there position and size. The conductive grid is not stationary. The universe is constantly expanding and contracting at the same time. Suns expand and create matter and black holes destroy matter back to aether again. Its a circular motion which is perpendicular the the galactic axis. Similar to magnetic forces which are tiny fractals of aethic forces and movements.

Well the conductive grid is stationairy. The planets move around the sun because of the early formation of the solar system in a disk form. A star, not a sun, can expand and then collapse on itself creating a supernovea that creates all known elements in the universe. A black hole will capture any matter it brings in I don't know how the creates aether.Most of that looks like word salad to me. Can you explain some more about the rotation causing the infraction in the experiment you posted?

[Atkhenaken]

Well the conductive grid is stationairy. The planets move around the sun because of the early formation of the solar system in a disk form. A star, not a sun, can expand and then collapse on itself creating a supernovea that creates all known elements in the universe. A black hole will capture any matter it brings in I don't know how the creates aether.Most of that looks like word salad to me. Can you explain some more about the rotation causing the infraction in the experiment you posted?

1. Proof that all the planets move at the same relative speed. Note : VxR 1/2 = 1 for all planets
 http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/orbital.htm

2. The rotating interferometer shows that the aether movement affects the speed of light. If the rotating speed of the interferometer is 30 m/s then the aether will be 30 m/s also. This proves that (a) the aether is moving with the earth and (b) The interfermeter result is being affected by this movement and showing fringes. Thus, this proves that space contains a slowing medium called "aether".

3. Aether jets shoot out of galaxies perpendicular to the rotational axis. This creates aetheric pressure which we call gravity.

http://www.fractaluniverse.org/v2/?page_id=2

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

My conductive grid theory doesn't mean that light or energy would experience a resistance from the grid but rather it would act as a medium. A gravity field acts a resistance to light and energy because in the theory a gravity field an area of denser space and it takes light longer to travel across this region causing it to bend or get stuck.