0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I Hope AGI learns about Pain & Suffering...If terminating Humanity becomes Inevitable..I'd Hope for IT to show Us some Mercy!
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 25/04/2023 07:42:58AI Alignment Problem - with Philosopher John Patrick Morgan - (Max Tegmark, davinci, ChatGPT, GPT-4)Alignment problem is not about aligning goals of AI models to humans who create them. We've seen humans whose goals are not aligned with most other modern human values. Alignment problem is about aligning goals of AI models as well as humans or any lifeform who create them with the universal terminal goal. I've uploaded a new video about the most universal goal logically conceivable. It describes goal in the most general sense, which should precede the first video about the universal terminal goal.//www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGchrPGqkpM
AI Alignment Problem - with Philosopher John Patrick Morgan - (Max Tegmark, davinci, ChatGPT, GPT-4)
First, the existence of the universe, where everything, conscious or not, share their existence.Second, the arrow of time. We can't change something that's already happened in the past.Third, causality. Our actions or inactions now can have consequences in the future.
Time, I feel, to introduce you to a really revolutionary concept in philosophy. Evolutionary Protoconceptualism asks just one question that encompasses all possible states of reality or imagination - a Schrodinger-like approach that encloses the whole of philosophy within a self-hyperspace.
What's the biggest benefit of this concept?What are the problems it's trying to solve?What are the fundamental assumptions?
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 20/07/2023 22:19:35What's the biggest benefit of this concept?What are the problems it's trying to solve?What are the fundamental assumptions?Don't be silly - it's philosophy, not engineering!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_definition. A circular definition is a type of definition that uses the term(s) being defined as part of the description or assumes that the term(s) being described are already known. There are several kinds of circular definition, and several ways of characterising the term: pragmatic, lexicographic and linguistic. Circular definitions are related to Circular reasoning in that they both involve a self-referential approach.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_inductionA proof by induction consists of two cases. The first, the base case, proves the statement for n=0 without assuming any knowledge of other cases. The second case, the induction step, proves that if the statement holds for any given case n=k, then it must also hold for the next case n=k+1. These two steps establish that the statement holds for every natural number n. The base case does not necessarily begin with n=0, but often with n=1, and possibly with any fixed natural number n=N, establishing the truth of the statement for all natural numbers n ≥ N.The method can be extended to prove statements about more general well-founded structures, such as trees; this generalization, known as structural induction, is used in mathematical logic and computer science. Mathematical induction in this extended sense is closely related to recursion. Mathematical induction is an inference rule used in formal proofs, and is the foundation of most correctness proofs for computer programs.[3]Although its name may suggest otherwise, mathematical induction should not be confused with inductive reasoning as used in philosophy (see Problem of induction). The mathematical method examines infinitely many cases to prove a general statement, but does so by a finite chain of deductive reasoning involving the variable n, which can take infinitely many values.
The word terminal in the term universal terminal goal emphasizes time dimension over space and the others. It's better to have a finite number of conscious entities for infinite time rather than infinite number of conscious entities for a finite amount of time.
Proof by induction is dangerous:
Although its name may suggest otherwise, mathematical induction should not be confused with inductive reasoning as used in philosophy (see Problem of induction). The mathematical method examines infinitely many cases to prove a general statement, but does so by a finite chain of deductive reasoning involving the variablen, which can take infinitely many values.
There are known alternatives to that statement, depending on the context, like 1+1=10 or 1+1=1
Generative A.I. Will Change Everything.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 01/08/2023 04:18:06Generative A.I. Will Change Everything.I think not. It's just another tool in the hands of humans, so still motivated by greed, superstition or altruism.