0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
No question.Webb is not Hubble. Webb is Hubble that can correct its own lens errors.That's good.
Quote from: opportunity on 13/02/2018 15:14:35No question.Webb is not Hubble. Webb is Hubble that can correct its own lens errors.That's good.Yes that sounds very good, it may lead to new discovery.
Quote from: Thebox on 13/02/2018 15:17:12Quote from: opportunity on 13/02/2018 15:14:35No question.Webb is not Hubble. Webb is Hubble that can correct its own lens errors.That's good.Yes that sounds very good, it may lead to new discovery.I think it will. They're aiming to see the most distant stars and thus arrive at an ultimate value for the red shift effect factor. My writing work says it will be a value of z = ~20.8. Those results are expected late next year.
Quote from: opportunity on 14/02/2018 08:29:01Quote from: Thebox on 13/02/2018 15:17:12Quote from: opportunity on 13/02/2018 15:14:35No question.Webb is not Hubble. Webb is Hubble that can correct its own lens errors.That's good.Yes that sounds very good, it may lead to new discovery.I think it will. They're aiming to see the most distant stars and thus arrive at an ultimate value for the red shift effect factor. My writing work says it will be a value of z = ~20.8. Those results are expected late next year.The problem I have got is that the size of the Universe is relative to the magnification of the telescope, the Universe is size n in reality because we can nether know. Light intensity stops us seeing beyond a spherical boundary.
rtunity on
Really? Any links for that? We can only ask what the investors hope to achieve with these launches.I know the data is available late 2019.
Doing a satellite beyond Hubble with the ability to change the focus is a good idea; bad if they tooled it right this time and got it wrong.
We are waiting long; late 2019 and then add problems.Long enough for us to calculate before what they're trying to see....sounds bad, but who was happy going to get glasses the first time?
Tesla fanfare
Quote from: opportunity on 15/02/2018 13:21:24Tesla fanfareI am sorry that is a question I did not understand, Tesla fanfare?
Quote from: Thebox on 15/02/2018 13:24:03Quote from: opportunity on 15/02/2018 13:21:24Tesla fanfareI am sorry that is a question I did not understand, Tesla fanfare?Tesla as a story is not something I'd be using if not for doing what he wanted to achieve.....which was an absolute fail......I'm surprised his name is being used today......very surprised....
I'm suggesting he wasn't bang on with the photoelectric effect. I'm suggesting that frequency is inversely proposal to energy.