The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. The N-field
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46 47 48   Go Down

The N-field

  • 946 Replies
  • 215099 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #880 on: 17/05/2018 20:01:57 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/05/2018 19:47:24
That's still word salad.
Well that was 2.20 am this morning what do you expect.
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The N-field
« Reply #881 on: 17/05/2018 20:50:24 »
Quote from: Thebox on 17/05/2018 20:01:57
Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/05/2018 19:47:24
That's still word salad.
Well that was 2.20 am this morning what do you expect.
I expect you  to write nonsense regardless of the time.
I ought to be able to expect you to tidy it up when you "wake up a bit" but I have come to realise you don't care becaue you are trolling.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #882 on: 17/05/2018 21:22:07 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/05/2018 20:50:24
Quote from: Thebox on 17/05/2018 20:01:57
Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/05/2018 19:47:24
That's still word salad.
Well that was 2.20 am this morning what do you expect.
I expect you  to write nonsense regardless of the time.
I ought to be able to expect you to tidy it up when you "wake up a bit" but I have come to realise you don't care becaue you are trolling.
Dear Mr Chemist,

You have forced me into putting on my straight face, have I ever claimed anything but I am a troll? 

However, Mr Chemist, that does not mean I am stupid, take any sort of hard drugs or I am  insane.

Sincerely

Steve

p.s Confusion is an illusion ....
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The N-field
« Reply #883 on: 17/05/2018 21:51:35 »
Quote from: Thebox on 17/05/2018 21:22:07
However, Mr Chemist, that does not mean I am stupid, take any sort of hard drugs or I am  insane.
It doesn't rule those options out either.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #884 on: 17/05/2018 22:01:10 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/05/2018 21:51:35
Quote from: Thebox on 17/05/2018 21:22:07
However, Mr Chemist, that does not mean I am stupid, take any sort of hard drugs or I am  insane.
It doesn't rule those options out either.

Dear Mr Chemist,

At times you are like talking to a boring Bot who never has anything positive to say. Too much negative energy , never optimistic or excited at the thought of something new. 

So what if I am a bit eccentric and a bit of a ''nut'' job, that still does not make me stupid. I am science smart , it does not matter that I am a troll, because I am just brilliant.

They know I am brilliant for sure.

p.s Trying to get a job from home is hardly trying to rule the world, but we can go down that path :D

Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The N-field
« Reply #885 on: 18/05/2018 18:50:45 »
Quote from: Thebox on 17/05/2018 22:01:10
I am science smart
No, you are not.
Quote from: Thebox on 17/05/2018 22:01:10
So what if I am a bit eccentric and a bit of a ''nut'' job,
If you were just a bit of a nut, that wouldn't matter.
But you insist on polluting this site.
Do you not care that you are causing damage, or do you just not understand that you are doing so?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #886 on: 18/05/2018 19:06:18 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 18/05/2018 18:50:45
Quote from: Thebox on 17/05/2018 22:01:10
I am science smart
No, you are not.
Quote from: Thebox on 17/05/2018 22:01:10
So what if I am a bit eccentric and a bit of a ''nut'' job,
If you were just a bit of a nut, that wouldn't matter.
But you insist on polluting this site.
Do you not care that you are causing damage, or do you just not understand that you are doing so?
Would you tell a mechanic they were breaking your broken car?

I care ''they'' get it right.

P. s There is no pre-big bang theory, I am not breaking anything.
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #887 on: 18/05/2018 19:11:22 »
@Mr C, how am I doing damage ?

added -  I got there first Mr C, the theory of before the big bang is mine.  It changes nothing of present science.   I made sure all the science I have used works with present theories.

I only change some interpretation of things.

I agree space-time, the overlay of space, is expanding.  Think Mr C please for once.  My theory is so good, it gives religion a God with no description needed, a miracle,  it gives science the randomness of the Universe .  We in science know

0d531292c03d764899168a913f98da77.gif= Var (x) where x is infinite

Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The N-field
« Reply #888 on: 19/05/2018 01:26:58 »
Quote from: Thebox on 18/05/2018 19:11:22
how am I doing damage ?
You are posting stuff that makes no sense on a science site.
Please stop.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #889 on: 19/05/2018 01:51:46 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 19/05/2018 01:26:58
Quote from: Thebox on 18/05/2018 19:11:22
how am I doing damage ?
You are posting stuff that makes no sense on a science site.
Please stop.

You must have a really poor ability to understand if you think my science makes no sense.  Do you have difficulties understanding the truth ?

Now unless my science is going to cause an intergalactic war ,  there is nothing incorrect with it.  Your failure to understand is not my problem.   At least Alan had the common decency to just say he though it was BS, he did not pretend he did not understand or it was no sense.
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #890 on: 19/05/2018 11:07:48 »
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #891 on: 19/05/2018 12:23:04 »
So the big bang was an act of randomness. 

07f084f9a400d33a7dc75ee9a03bf375.gif

+

497276252e5bdf85d886595018d5ef7b.gif

+

2133b9f926c360c5027f415246c53fb8.gif

= 579a2445ae6c9e01be9a9419bc8703bb.gif  where t = ∞

Then the big bang is whatever you say it is . 

The only difference is understanding space-time is an overlay of absolute space.

Is that difficult to understand ?

NO

A = 0.5

B= 0.5 

It is not the same maths for spacial fields which is

A = -0.5

B=0.5

A+B=0
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The N-field
« Reply #892 on: 19/05/2018 13:08:42 »
Quote from: Thebox on 19/05/2018 01:51:46
Now unless my science is going to ...

It is not science.

Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The N-field
« Reply #893 on: 19/05/2018 13:09:54 »
Quote from: Thebox on 19/05/2018 01:51:46
At least Alan had the common decency to just say he though it was BS, he did not pretend he did not understand or it was no sense.
What do you think the difference is between BS and nonsense?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #894 on: 19/05/2018 13:36:04 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 19/05/2018 13:09:54
Quote from: Thebox on 19/05/2018 01:51:46
At least Alan had the common decency to just say he though it was BS, he did not pretend he did not understand or it was no sense.
What do you think the difference is between BS and nonsense?
Nonsense is when something makes no sense to the reader, they cannot understand it , it is not making any sense to the reader.  Where BS, the reader understood it loud and clear but does not agree with it.
However if somebody declares BS, they then have to prove why it is BS like I do when I declare a piece of science BS. 

Notice I do not say science is nonsense, I declare BS. Which means I understand science and it makes sense to me what science says , but I also know why it is wrong to a degree so declare BS.

I am far from being this idiot you think I am .

i.e

Space is expanding  BS

Space-time is expanding Fact


Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The N-field
« Reply #895 on: 19/05/2018 13:55:28 »
Quote from: Thebox on 19/05/2018 13:36:04
However if somebody declares BS, they then have to prove why it is BS
No
If you post stuff that has no basis in evidence  we can write it off as bs without needing to supply any evidence.
However, the point is that I did understand what you posted.
And I pointed out why it was wrong- probabilities have to be between 0 and 1.

It is up to you to show us why your idea of things with infinitely high probabilities is anything but nonsense, and so far you haven't done so.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #896 on: 19/05/2018 14:07:00 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 19/05/2018 13:55:28
Quote from: Thebox on 19/05/2018 13:36:04
However if somebody declares BS, they then have to prove why it is BS
No
If you post stuff that has no basis in evidence  we can write it off as bs without needing to supply any evidence.
However, the point is that I did understand what you posted.
And I pointed out why it was wrong- probabilities have to be between 0 and 1.

It is up to you to show us why your idea of things with infinitely high probabilities is anything but nonsense, and so far you haven't done so.
You have no idea, P=0 and P=1 defines boundaries, it is inevitable.   A deck of cards will always draw an ace of diamonds over time. 

b0a82aeebbb0efe2ad3c2aa2578287e9.gif/t

It is set random theory .  Infinite is absolute randomness. 

691075217eb13799c1fc2c5ae2f3b215.gif  /t  = ∞  where k is an infinite volume of points k=0,    Absolute random

added -

scenario

I have an infinite deck of individual cards valued from 1 continuous infinitely counting up.

What is you chance of drawing the number 1000 out of the deck ?

1/∞ I get.

added- or try it this way

In an infinite volume of points, what is the chance of one point manifesting ZpE  ?

Now because this has already happened we know there is a 1 of so many points chance.

1/million ?

1/billion?

1/trillion?

No 1/infinite

P big bang = 1/∞  not  0/∞

Yes sort of backwards because the 1 does not exist until the big bang.


Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The N-field
« Reply #897 on: 19/05/2018 15:07:48 »
But you said P was infinity before.
Are you saying you were wrong?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #898 on: 19/05/2018 15:11:31 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 19/05/2018 15:07:48
But you said P was infinity before.
Are you saying you were wrong?
Yes and no, the chance of something from nothing is 1/infinite
The chance it happened P=1

You do realise I would never hurt science ,  I love science , I think science is great and once I put everything together and realised science is mostly correct,  I take my hat off and have found my equal .

Respect to science sincerely, I agree with most things but say it differently sometimes to gain new angles.


added- I am going out for a barbecue now,, wow lucky me lol

I will leave you with this question so I have got something to discuss later on if I get a reply.

Can we consider a photon is  point to point energy transfer/motion ?

Meaning energy passing from one point to the adjoining point , that would explain why it is so fast.


Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The N-field
« Reply #899 on: 19/05/2018 15:33:45 »
Albeit in another thread,
you claimed that P was a probability, and that it was infinite.
That's enough to prove that you are simply wrong.. Why don't you accept it?

Quote from: Thebox on 13/05/2018 18:32:11
Quote from: Bored chemist on 13/05/2018 18:17:10
Quote from: Thebox on 13/05/2018 17:00:13
A+B=1

There you go plain and simple. There is better writers than me who will write it up .
Plain, yes.
Simple, yes
Meaningful, No
And since it has no meaning, nobody can write it up for you
A = 0.5
B = 0.5

a3f66d8fd5b6a233efd5c2aba0dc384a.gif  = 1 = t

P 04d3322f152302e15e59732af1386109.gif = ∞

ok?

added-

ea921dc0ecfd86b06cb8d9c0a21e1d1e.gif = 04d3322f152302e15e59732af1386109.gif  +  3712783d47b49cfae9baa99e5fc7480a.gif + 4929ddbee4554d5b9ba8621965c30c80.gif


Abstract

0.5→k←0.5

0.5 + 0.5 / k


Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46 47 48   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: misunderstanding basic science  / pigeon chess  / delusional thinking 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.361 seconds with 64 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.