[Bored chemist]

Unevinced means  something new,

No it doesn't.

I can show with a simple experiment that the idea of my drive works in principle. 

Then do so.


Please note that cartoons are not experiments, nor are they evidence.

[guest39538]

Unevinced means  something new,

No it doesn't.

I can show with a simple experiment that the idea of my drive works in principle. 

Then do so.


Please note that cartoons are not experiments, nor are they evidence.

I could devise a real experiment to show the physics of my idea work to gain a warp speed by using the N-field drive.  Whether we are intelligent enough to build such a craft is hard to say.  In principle it should not be that difficult with the right staff.
If I explained it in full I am giving it away, I have no  protection or patent. Anyway my internet will be going off so you have not got put up with me much longer.

[Bored chemist]

I could devise a real experiment to show the physics of my idea work to gain a warp speed by using the N-field drive.  Whether we are intelligent enough to build such a craft is hard to say.  In principle it should not be that difficult with the right staff.

Do you think anyone believes you?

[guest39538]

I could devise a real experiment to show the physics of my idea work to gain a warp speed by using the N-field drive.  Whether we are intelligent enough to build such a craft is hard to say.  In principle it should not be that difficult with the right staff.

Do you think anyone believes you?

Do I think anybody believes me ?  I have no idea, probably not because most people don't even understand about fields etc.

What I do know is this, my ''spaceship'' design is ergonomically precise.

2 : the design characteristics of an object resulting especially from the application of the science

I applied the science I know to the shape and applied the science I know of critical balance. 

Believe me or not,  but if there were aliens and saucers, I am pretty sure the only way they could cross dimensions is by Quantum leaping over the Quantum Gap , by gaining enough acceleration to leap the gap . 

I am saying no more I know what I am talking about .

p.s My spaceship inbound would  look like a bright light in the sky, until  boosters flips it to recede away.  Awesome manoeuvres.

[Kryptid]

If your N-field drive didn't work, would you count that as a falsification of the N-field?

[guest39538]

If your N-field drive didn't work, would you count that as a falsification of the N-field?

Good question, but no not at all, it just means I would have to rethink the situation.  However I know the physics to my drive works , it is not conventional thinking , as always I leave things out, I am not telling all. My drive is the physics needed to make it work, the design of the drive I could not do with precise specifications, I am not an engineer, well maybe to a degree, but I know the physics needed . I can make a worm hole if I could get scientists /engineers to create the device.




Is the sky not proof enough of a n-field generated by a N-field?

[guest39538]

Added- ok , I just had another ''upload'' of new knowledge, Tesla just gave me a ZpE idea.

[Bored chemist]

most people don't even understand about fields etc.

That group includes 1 more than you think it does.

[guest39538]

most people don't even understand about fields etc.

That group includes 1 more than you think it does.

I always thought you knew about fields , I could teach you if you like?

[Bored chemist]

most people don't even understand about fields etc.

That group includes 1 more than you think it does.

I always thought you knew about fields , I could teach you if you like?

Thus far you have failed to explain anything about your made -up N field.
It seems unrealistic to think you know any more about other fields.

[guest39538]

most people don't even understand about fields etc.

That group includes 1 more than you think it does.

I always thought you knew about fields , I could teach you if you like?

Thus far you have failed to explain anything about your made -up N field.
It seems unrealistic to think you know any more about other fields.

I know about fixed fields or dynamic fields, I am ''programmed'' to give you answers.

[Bored chemist]

I am ''programmed'' to give you answers.

That would explain why you sometimes seem like a chat bot.

However, you don't give meaningful answers.

Cut to the chase: what is an N field?

[guest39538]

I am ''programmed'' to give you answers.

That would explain why you sometimes seem like a chat bot.

However, you don't give meaningful answers.

Cut to the chase: what is an N field?

An n-field is a neutral field that the origin has three possibilities.

1) An intelligent design from external sources

2) A field emanating from bodies

3) Both

This field over time has been defined by different names such as:

Higg's field

Space-time

negative energy

[guest39538]

I decided to visit the after life earlier , I wanted to see what ghosts see. 

Did you know if you could create a quantum tunnel you would fall through space  like falling  to the ground, but in any direction you opened the tunnel.  I like my n-field it is quite cool.


n-field.jpg (130.11 kB . 1560x633 - viewed 3232 times)

[Kryptid]

If a failure of your N-field drive would not count as a falsification of the N-field, then what kind of an experiment could falsify the N-field in your eyes?

[guest39538]

If a failure of your N-field drive would not count as a falsification of the N-field, then what kind of an experiment could falsify the N-field in your eyes?

I could perhaps try an experiment where I curve space time observably, if science tech support could produce what I needed to create the experiment.  It is not that difficult of an experiment, so I imagine it is doable.
My theory is big, there is lots of parts to it.  I keep finding new parts to add, like I have just worked out I think how to gain perpetual motion and perpetual energy in one ''move''. Earth based of course . I am not sure it would have a huge use unless it could be altered to do so , but the mechanics would work I think.  No energy input either which is good.

In short I think I can show some of my work with experiment.  Soory its 5 am ere my head not with it , no kip yet

[Kryptid]

I could perhaps try an experiment where I curve space time observably

Failure to do that would then count as falsification? Remember, I'm talking about falsification specifically.

[guest39538]

I could perhaps try an experiment where I curve space time observably

Failure to do that would then count as falsification? Remember, I'm talking about falsification specifically.

If my basic experiment failed , I think any version of the field would be in danger.   But also if any of my parameters of my experiment are wrong, then that fails to show I am wrong and I will have to re-think the experiment.

[Kryptid]

If my basic experiment failed , I think any version of the field would be in danger.   But also if any of my parameters of my experiment are wrong, then that fails to show I am wrong and I will have to re-think the experiment.

Then I think you'd best think of an experiment that could potentially falsify the idea completely. Otherwise it isn't scientific.

[guest39538]

If my basic experiment failed , I think any version of the field would be in danger.   But also if any of my parameters of my experiment are wrong, then that fails to show I am wrong and I will have to re-think the experiment.

Then I think you'd best think of an experiment that could potentially falsify the idea completely. Otherwise it isn't scientific.

It depends on what I am trying to prove, I know my N-field drive will work that's an easy one and not conventional.  But first I would have to prove I can manipulate space-time which I think I can.  The physics proves my N-field particle is a possibility.
I am not sure, I am not sure there is anyone or any experiment to show I am incorrect, just experiments to show I am correct.

If anything the Cavendish experiment shows I am correct and N is attracted to N.  But my new thermal math in another thread has got me thinking .

There is only one thing I am not sure of in my experiment, and that is if we can produce a certain standing wave .  I can't even say what is it or I give my experiment up and ideas in one piece of information.