[aetzbar (OP)]

This is what happens .... A physical element is created,
Carbon, hydrogen, iron, nitrogen, copper, calcium, and so on.

Each element has a unique combination of energy and passive time.
A lot of passive time and a little energy, creates electrical conductive material
A little passive time and more energy, creates an isolated element

Electric current = stream of passive time.

There are no more particles.
 the physical matter is like a line, not a geometric point.

Passive energy of matter comes from inner energy.

[Bored chemist]

Do you realise that even speculative science is still expected to have some link to the real world?

[aetzbar (OP)]

Yes, certainly, and especially if the ideas are measured.

[Bored chemist]

Yes, certainly, and especially if the ideas are measured.

And how did you measure the elements: "Carbon, hydrogen, iron, nitrogen, copper, calcium, and so on"
 that were created?
Because, if you didn't create them and measure them you have to accept that, by your own standards, you are not doing science.

[aetzbar (OP)]

With scales
Selected a gold block, and an aluminum block, which have the same passive energy.
Passive energy is measured using a spring.
When we put them on the scale, the golden block comes down.
This is a tiny change, which requires a sensitive balance.
Spring and scales are another measuring instrument.
The spring is similar to the length, and the scales measure the angle.

[Bored chemist]

With scales
Selected a gold block, and an aluminum block, which have the same passive energy.
Passive energy is measured using a spring.
When we put them on the scale, the golden block comes down.
This is a tiny change, which requires a sensitive balance.
Spring and scales are another measuring instrument.
The spring is similar to the length, and the scales measure the angle.

You are fibbing, aren't you?
You never did that experiment.
Others have done so; and the scales agree with the spring (once you account for air buoyancy- or eliminate it by working in a vacuum).

So, by your own criteria, this isn't science.
Why don't you stop?

[aetzbar (OP)]

This is my theory, and it includes very sensitive experiments in the field of tiny phenomena.
A scientific institution can conduct such experiments.
I only point to the expected results.
Pye's experiment is like that too.
Spring and scales are completely different devices.

[aetzbar (OP)]

An innovative dramatic idea in physics.
The material is a physical form, because it is formed from two physical and quantitative things.
Quantitative thing called energy.
Quantitative thing called passive time.
To this day, the material is considered "quantitative"
But this is not true, matter is a physical form.
Newton's view, Einstein's view, the material is still considered "quantitative thing"

[Bored chemist]

A scientific institution can conduct such experiments.

They did.
They found that the spring an the balance gave the same result.
So, we now know that your idea is wrong.

Why don't you stop?

An innovative dramatic idea in physics.

you missed out "incorrect" from your description

An incorrect innovative dramatic idea in physics

[aetzbar (OP)]

First of all, I thank you for your interest in a very strange theory.

If you go to a tree full of apples, you can choose the apple, which is the largest volume.
You can also choose the apple, which has the largest amount of passive energy.
But you will not be able to choose the apple with the greatest amount of material.
You do not have a device that measures a quantity of matter, and you do not have a natural sense that distinguishes a quantity of matter.
So what does the material do, in the theories of Newton and Einstein?

[aetzbar (OP)]

To disqualify the theories of Newton and Einstein, it is sufficient to prove that the material is a non-scientific concept.
This proof has been presented, and it is very simple.
Einstein freed himself from the concept of Newton's mysterious gravity, but he could not free himself
From the concept of mass (mass = quantity of matter)
The theory I propose is also free of the concept of mass.
Two new concepts go with me, passive energy and passive time.
These two create a physical revolution.

[Bored chemist]

You do not have a device that measures a quantity of matter,

Yes we do.
We have already pointed this out to you.

You keep pretending it didn't happen.

To disqualify the theories of Newton and Einstein, it is sufficient to prove that the material is a non-scientific concept.

Your whole idea is be non-scientific.
Why don't you stop?

[aetzbar (OP)]

The elements are physical forms created by the combination of amounts of passive time and energy.
The material called gold is a physical form.
The material called carbon is a specific physical form.
Form is not quantitative - the material is not quantitative.
All matter in the universe is composed of a mixture of passive time and energy.
This is the new material theory, and there are no particles.
If passive time and energy leave each other, the universe will disappear.

[Bored chemist]

None of what you post makes any sense.
Bits of it are known to be wrong.
You are not here to do science, you are preaching some strange delusion of your own.

[aetzbar (OP)]

There is two views to science, the practical aspect, and the. Theoretical aspect.
The practical aspect brought the wonderful technology we all know.
I discuss the theoretical aspect of science, which is always changing.
From legends and stories, to the idea of "five quantitative and measured things."
Length, area, volume, time and energy.
This idea removes gravity and mass from science.
This idea puts into science passive time and passive energy.
It is not easy to accept such a change, and is usually rejected immediately.

[Bored chemist]

There is two views to science, the practical aspect, and the. Theoretical aspect.

And when the theory doesn't agree with the facts, you have to accept that it is wrong.

It is not easy to accept such a change, and is usually rejected immediately.

Of course it is rejected.
It is based on utter nonsense.

[aetzbar (OP)]

What flows between the poles of a magnet? Passive time
What flows in the lines of electricity? Passive time.
What flows between the poles of the earth? Passive time.
Passive time fills the infinite space.
Passive time is a total resting.
What creates material? Mixing of passive time and energy.
When passive time is cooled toward absolute zero, superconductivity is created.
Lightning is a stream of passive time.
Passive time exists, and we move through it.

[Bored chemist]

What flows between the poles of a magnet? Passive time

So, "passive time" is nothing.
(Because nothing flows between the poles of a magnet)

Why do you post this stuff?
Have you mistaken this  for a blogging site?

[aetzbar (OP)]

For a person, passive time is nothing.
In terms of nature, passive time is a "quantitative thing"
Since man is able to measure passive time, his status changes "from nothing to something quantitative)
Suddenly, all electrical phenomena are phenomena of passive time.
Nature is miraculous, and there are only 5 quantitative things.
Length, area, volume, time and energy.
All these things are "nothing" but they are "all"

It is time to connect with the miraculous phenomena of nature

[guest39538]

For a person, passive time is nothing.

For anybody reading this, passive time is nothing while passing time.  I have already told you that passive does not mean whatever you seem to think it means. 

What you are trying to say:  Passing time

I do however understand ambiguity of reading , so here is the choice

1. Receiving or subjected to an action without responding or initiating an action in return: the mind viewed as a passive receptacle for sensory experience.
2. Accepting or submitting without objection or resistance; submissive: a passive acceptance of one's fate.
3. Existing, conducted, or experienced without active or concerted effort: "Although tick paralysis is a reportable disease in Washington, surveillance is passive, and only 10 cases were reported during 1987-1995" (US Department of Health and Human Services). "[Many parents believe] that computers are educational and, at the least, less passive than television" (Laurie Hays).
4. Of, relating to, or being certain bonds or shares that do not bear financial interest.
5. Of, relating to, or being a solar heating or cooling system that uses no external mechanical power.
6. Grammar Of, relating to, or being a verb form or voice used to indicate that the grammatical subject is the object of the action or the effect of the verb. For example, in the sentence They were impressed by his manner, were impressed is in the passive voice.
7. Chemistry Unreactive except under special or extreme conditions; inert.
8. Electronics Exhibiting no gain or contributing no energy: a passive circuit element.
9. Psychology Relating to or being an inactive or submissive role in a relationship, especially a sexual relationship.

What number would you like to choose?

https://www.thefreedictionary.com/passive