[LB7 (OP)]

Look at the last message please.

[Colin2B]

some people understood I'm right ... but they say nothing...

This is a popular misconception made by people posting in New Theories. The general reason more experienced poster do not reply is because they see what the problem is but understand that it would take a great deal of time and effort to convince the theorist that they are wrong.

Physics is not my speciality...

An understanding of basic mechanics is an important part of physics.

[alancalverd]

This appears to be a device for stretching and thereby heating a spring, the purpose of which escapes me. But physics is my speciality, so what do I know?

[Bored chemist]

I can draw a unicorn farting hydrogen, but it doesn't mean I have solved the energy crisis.

[Bored chemist]

I think (it is a little more in fact ) some people understood I'm right ... but they say nothing

No, we just got tired of explaining that your idea s already proven to be impossible.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem

And your bizarre idea that you know better than the physicists, in spite of knowing that you don't understand physics is... well, let's just say there's a name for it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

[Bored chemist]

But my device is not an hamiltonnien

It can be mapped to a Hamiltonian.

[Bored chemist]

How ?

Answering that would need a clear explanation of how your system "works".

[Bored chemist]

"The blue color is small spheres like molecules of water but without mass and without friction. "
So, nothing actually real.
"The force of the spring is constant, doesn't depend of the length of the spring. "
So, not a real spring.

It's not going to work because it's impossible to construct- never mind anything complicated like Noether's theorem.

[Bored chemist]

It still makes no sense.

[Bored chemist]

Stuff like "the force of the spring is constant, doesn't depend of the length of the spring. " makes no sense; that's not how springs work.

"The springs have at each time the same orientation but the orientation change when the device deforms itself,"
Why does the device deform itself?

"the springs follows the orientation of the left wall "
Why?
Is it magic?

" The green line moves to the right. "
Why?

[Bored chemist]

Spring for watches works like that,

No, they don't.
That's why they had to invent this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusee_(horology)


I'm guessing part of the problem is linguistic.
I can't even parse this
"An external device, because the device is unstable. But that external count all the energies in/out."

[smart]

The sum of energy is well at 0 but there is the right shift of the blue spheres and like that the sum of energy is not at 0.

In my humble opinion I think it's not possible to create or destroy free energy without breaking the laws of physics... 

See: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/19216/why-cant-energy-be-created-or-destroyed

[smart]

Reality check: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy

[yor_on]

I think you need to answer Bored Chemist questions LB. They are to the point,  and you should try to explain how you see it, so that we can see it too.

" "
"The springs have at each time the same orientation but the orientation change when the device deforms itself,"

1. Why does the device deform itself?

"the springs follows the orientation of the left wall "

2. Why?


" The green line moves to the right. "

3. Why?  " "

Start with those.

[Bored chemist]

I take the mass and the friction at zero because it is easier to calculate.

If you make the right assumptions you can get any (un-physical) result you like.

[syhprum]

You cannot extract energy from nowhere by moving springs or weights about that has been proved umpteen times over the years, such devices can be used to store energy but you always eventually get less useful energy out than what you put in.

I does not take much engineering  skill to make a machine that appears to do this to extract money from suckers but physicist soon see thru it

[Bored chemist]

I don't find my mistake, could you help me ?

Your mistake is not recognising that what you think you have done is impossible.