[smart (OP)]

Can you improve your neuroholographic memory by stimulation of the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus?

In specific, I'm really interested to understand the role of dopamine in the autoregulation (transcription) of neuroholographic memory in hippocampal cells and prefrontal cortex.

What do you think?

[smart (OP)]

@puppypower :

What do you think about the autoregulation of dopamine in prefrontal cortex?

Are dopamine agonists reversible RNA/DNA transcriptase?

Can a RNA transcriptase reverse neuroholographic input (oscillations) in dopamine neurons?

[evan_au]

the prefrontal cortex... in hippocampal cells

The prefrontal cortex is towards the front of your brain.
The hippocampus is towards the base of your brain.
They are connected, but different.

Can you improve your neuroholographic memory by stimulation of the prefrontal cortex?

Perhaps you should first ask "Is neuroholographic memory even a Thing?"...

[smart (OP)]

The prefrontal cortex is towards the front of your brain.
The hippocampus is towards the base of your brain.
They are connected, but different.

Precisely. Hippocampal cells and the prefrontal cortex do share the same neuroholographic system: Reversible RNA transcriptases may promote dopamine autoregulation (transcription) through biophotonic input/output. 

Perhaps you should first ask "Is neuroholographic memory even a Thing?"...

You can use Wikipedia power for that. 
 

[Bored chemist]

You can use Wikipedia power for that. 

I did.
It isn't.
As I said before you keep doing this.
You keep assuming something happens, or is real, and then looking for an explanation of it- without checking if you are trying to explain a figment of your own imagination.

[smart (OP)]

You keep assuming something happens, or is real, and then looking for an explanation of it- without checking if you are trying to explain a figment of your own imagination.

I never assume that Wikipedia has absolute knowledge, however..

[smart (OP)]

@Bored chemist

Your lack of imagination is what prevent you from acquiring new forms of knowledge. 

[Bored chemist]

@Bored chemist

Your lack of imagination is what prevent you from acquiring new forms of knowledge. 

Making up sh1t is not acquiring new knowledge

[smart (OP)]

Making up sh1t is not acquiring new knowledge

No. Reversible RNA transcriptases can autoregulate dopamine transcription through biophotonic input/output in hippocampal cells and the prefrontal cortex...

[smart (OP)]

For a primer on neuroholographic memory, see: https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=70184.

[smart (OP)]

Can neuroholographic memory be fine-tuned by priming dopaminergic (D2/D3) activity in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus?

[smart (OP)]

Are dopamine (D2/D3) neurons acting as RNA-guided biophotonic waveguides when transcoding mental holographic input into conscious experience?

[Bored chemist]

For a primer on neuroholographic memory, see: https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=70184.

For a primer on why neuroholographic memory is not real
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=70184

[Bored chemist]

Are dopamine (D2/D3) neurons acting as RNA-guided biophotonic waveguides when transcoding mental holographic input into conscious experience?

You are doing it again.
The first question to ask is "Do  biophotonic waveguides exist?"
And the answer is no.
So you don't need to explain them.

[smart (OP)]

@Bored chemist :

Here we propose myelinated axons as potential biophoton waveguides in the brain, and we support this hypothesis with detailed theoretical modeling.

See: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep36508

Again, please read the article before commenting further.

[smart (OP)]

Are dopamine (D2/D3) neurons acting as RNA-guided biophotonic waveguides when transcoding mental holographic input into conscious experience?

Is it possible that dopamine activity can transcode neuroholographic memory (biophotons emissions) into RNA/DNA information?

[Bored chemist]

@Bored chemist :

Here we propose myelinated axons as potential biophoton waveguides in the brain, and we support this hypothesis with detailed theoretical modeling.

See: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep36508

Again, please read the article before commenting further.

How many times do I need to read it before you understand what it means?
If I read it again do you suddenly recognise that "we support this hypothesis with detailed theoretical modeling." means they have shown that something might be possible, rather than it is actually real?

[smart (OP)]

If you don't understand how light affect cellular and eletrochemical processes in living organisms, please go read a physics book before going any further.