0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/02/2018 01:53:45You seem to be struggling with rows and columns in a 3 dimension spaceI'm not struggling, I can count them just fine."Rows" That's one dimension."Columns" that's two dimensions.Where are you seeing a third dimension there?Do you understand that 2 is not 3?Do you understand that a 2 dimensional thing like a matrix is not a 3 dimensional thing like R3?
You seem to be struggling with rows and columns in a 3 dimension space
You need to move yourself around to the side of the cube, you will see more rows and columns.
however you can't seem to comprehend a 3d matrix.
The Matrix was just bullshit: a pointless plot and some cheap CGI.
If you want to try to invent some entity that's a bit like a matrix, but not two dimensional, feel free.But it will not be a matrix.Also you will need to invent the laws of maths that go with your new creation.Frankly I don't think you are clever enough.
It is xyz math, what is difficult about that?
Quote from: Thebox on 27/02/2018 18:12:25It is xyz math, what is difficult about that?What do you think that means?
Why do you think it helps to post stuff like that?You have introduced three terms, without explaining what any of them means." dimensional maths", " coordinate maths" and ". xyz math".Since people do maths on 3 dimensional (and huger dimensional) structures with 2 dimensional matrices, why do you think that you need a "matrix" with three dimensions (in fact something that clearly isn't a matrix)?No matter what rambling gibberish you post R3 will never be a matrix.
As for the other, I think you are cold reading again, i
Just as a concrete example of why you are wrong, here's something I don't expect you to understand.The matrix which represents rotation in three dimensions is given herehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_matrix#In_three_dimensionsThe matrix has two dimensions. It has three rows and three columns.Quote from: Thebox on 27/02/2018 19:47:18As for the other, I think you are cold reading again, iWhat do you think "cold reading" means?
Just as a concrete example of why you are wrong, here's something I don't expect you to understand.The matrix which represents rotation in three dimensions is given herehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_matrix#In_three_dimensions
Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/02/2018 20:31:09Just as a concrete example of why you are wrong, here's something I don't expect you to understand.The matrix which represents rotation in three dimensions is given herehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_matrix#In_three_dimensionsI understood that because I have used cgi.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/02/2018 20:31:09Just as a concrete example of why you are wrong, here's something I don't expect you to understand.The matrix which represents rotation in three dimensions is given herehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_matrix#In_three_dimensionsThe matrix has two dimensions. It has three rows and three columns.Quote from: Thebox on 27/02/2018 19:47:18As for the other, I think you are cold reading again, iWhat do you think "cold reading" means?Can't interpret anything other than the exact, not having enough ambiguity in your reading to comprehend something with words used in relation to rather than the exact.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/02/2018 20:38:50Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/02/2018 20:31:09Just as a concrete example of why you are wrong, here's something I don't expect you to understand.The matrix which represents rotation in three dimensions is given herehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_matrix#In_three_dimensionsI understood that because I have used cgi. Then why did you think you needed a three d matrix?Quote from: Thebox on 27/02/2018 20:37:20Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/02/2018 20:31:09Just as a concrete example of why you are wrong, here's something I don't expect you to understand.The matrix which represents rotation in three dimensions is given herehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_matrix#In_three_dimensionsThe matrix has two dimensions. It has three rows and three columns.Quote from: Thebox on 27/02/2018 19:47:18As for the other, I think you are cold reading again, iWhat do you think "cold reading" means?Can't interpret anything other than the exact, not having enough ambiguity in your reading to comprehend something with words used in relation to rather than the exact. That's interesting.Now go and look up what it really means.That's the point.It's not a problem with my reading.You just keep using the wrong words.Why not stop being crap at communication and science, by being a bit more careful and not making up dross?
One cannot make up physical facts, the physical facts govern themselves.
, density is when the space is ''squeezed out of something''.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/02/2018 20:48:11One cannot make up physical facts, the physical facts govern themselves. You made this upQuote from: Thebox on 19/02/2018 22:15:22, density is when the space is ''squeezed out of something''.There are plenty of other examples.
Did you not think to yourself, that maybe something else was meant by this? As the obvious is space cannot be squeezed
I should of said the more dense an object is , the less space there is between atoms.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 19/02/2018 21:58:13What do you think "field density" means?It means how many different ''parts'' are crammed into one space. example a 2 cm ² grid reference [a], x,y dimensionsWe can fit in the area a 2cm * 2cm square, but if we squash the square making it denser, we can put two 2cm*2cm squares in the same size area. ok?
What do you think "field density" means?
Here's the context.Quote from: Thebox on 19/02/2018 22:07:46Quote from: Bored chemist on 19/02/2018 21:58:13What do you think "field density" means?It means how many different ''parts'' are crammed into one space. example a 2 cm ² grid reference [a], x,y dimensionsWe can fit in the area a 2cm * 2cm square, but if we squash the square making it denser, we can put two 2cm*2cm squares in the same size area. ok?
Dude I know what density is, just because I can't explain back in my own words very good, that does not mean I do not understand it
Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/02/2018 22:01:28Dude I know what density is, just because I can't explain back in my own words very good, that does not mean I do not understand it Two things.First, the quotes show you don't understand it. Secondly [ Invalid Attachment ]
Density is a measure of mass per unit of volume. ... The average density of an object equals its total mass divided by its total volume. An object made from a comparatively dense material (such as iron) will have less volume than an object of equal mass made from some less dense substance (such as water).