[phoba (OP)]

There is a "field" around any body on the Earth, only we refer to the "magnetic field" as a magnet, and we refer to the "biological field" as a living object, and we say "gravitational field" to the planet Earth ... We change its name only we bind it to the object around which it exists, but it is everywhere the same and has absolutely the same essence. Imagine many different ships walking the sea. You do not call the "water of this ship" or "the water of another ship," so the field for all bodies is one. As a rule, this field is a magnetic field, or according to the old-time ether. The structure of this medium is vortical, and the vortex itself is similar to a loop, to some three-dimensional node of this incredibly huge network, it is similar to the Web .... (it's all of it) .. Any atom, molecule or particle is just a sector or cell of this huge magnetic web. And this grid is always in a vortex motion. Since it is one whole, the angle with respect to the magnetic meridian will determine the sector of the structure. The network consists of vortices, and the vortex consists of three parts - like a simple magnet. Negative part, neutral and positive. Therefore, the registration angle will determine what kind of particle it is. Either an electron is a minus, or a proton plus a neutron or a bad wall. But in real time it is always a wave. 



















phoba. forum2x2. ru/t17-topic

[phoba (OP)]

It has been experimentally established that when a current flows through a conductor (winding), an electromagnetic field is formed along and around it, that is, the structure of the Earth's magnetic field is curved into a vortex electromagnetic state. It is clearly established that the diameter of the vortex structure around the conductor depends on the voltage. For example, at a voltage of 10 volts, the diameter of the vortex is 1 mm, and at a voltage of 220 volts the diameter of the vortex is already 2.2 cm ... and at 1000 volts the diameter is already 3 meters or what is called the ionization zone, which for example is formed around a Tesla high voltage transformer. As the current increases, their speed increases. That is, the "magnetic flux" that transfers energy from the primary winding to the secondary structure of the vortex ... So if the voltage determines the diameter of the vortex structure, then the diameter (length) of the conductor will determine the voltage on the secondary winding of the transformer.

In other words, the transformation of current and voltage of one magnitude into a current and a voltage of another magnitude occurs as a result of a change in the diameter and rotation frequency of the vortex structure, or what is called the "magnetic flux F"

[guest39538]

Hello, the one field you are talking about , I have a thread running called the N-field.    I call the one field you mention the n-field which is emitted by the N-field particle.  N stands for Neutral and my theory states N is attracted to N and all other fields such as a magnetic field  are subset  n-field fluctuations.

I like your thinking, you are thinking along my lines of approach.   

[phoba (OP)]

There is a media medium, on the structure of which the entire optical world is built. This environment can be called differently, magnetic, gravitational, or even whatever "field", but the essence of this environment remains not a betrayal and always the same. It follows that there are no different fields, but there is one field (ether) but with different states that can be interpreted as electromagnetic, sound, torsion, lepton or whatever. Consequently, there are no different particles, but there is a different structural state of the same particle - the etheron, which only in the laboratory can change its parameters in a very wide range. For example, it can increase, decrease, change the angular velocity, the rotation frequency of its individual sectors, and so on. The main property of this particle is that it reacts to the emotional energy of biological objects, including humans. According to the type of Masaru Emoto's influence on the structure of water in the process of changing its aggregate state. The same process.
Thus, what is called a "photon" always exists in space in expectation of becoming light, for example from a light bulb, and before it becomes light it is not yet a photon, but an electron. That is, to each specific state they tied their field and their particle (for example, light-photon, gravity-graviton, etc.) But in the reality of these states there are innumerable sets, so the number of elementary particles will grow infinitely or the principle changes in the state of only one particle - etheron.

[syhprum]

I don't think it a good idea to cut and paste exerts from a Russian article without at least detailing where the original article can be found so that we can at least get a machine translation if we are interested. 

[phoba (OP)]

I don't think it a good idea to cut and paste exerts from a Russian article without at least detailing where the original article can be found so that we can at least get a machine translation if we are interested. 

These are my articles.

[phoba (OP)]

Most of the conclusions of electromagnetism are based on the initially erroneous understanding and postulate from the textbook that two fields are supposedly formed around the conductor: magnetic and electromagnetic. Just two fields! Laughter While in fact along and around the conductor the magnetic field of the earth always exists, the structure of which under the action of electricity is curved into a vortex electromagnetic state. Those. around the conductor does not form two fields, and the one that curves is transformed!
What is an electric field, what is a magnetic field and what is an electromagnetic field?
An electric field is an electric current, just a measure, like a temperature, a potential difference, and it is not material. How can you say that the temperature or electricity is material? No way. But the magnetic field of the Earth is material, and the electromagnetic field is a change in the structure of the Earth's magnetic field into a vortex electromagnetic state. Exactly, and can not be otherwise, even when you say "Foucault eddy currents", then under the "vortex" one can not understand the "currents" themselves, but only the material structure of the electromagnetic field, which can be vortical and which is always outside in relation to to the guide himself. That is why the great Oersted said that "electricity does not flow through the conductor, it flows into it."

[phoba (OP)]

[phoba (OP)]

[jerrygg38]

I like your pictures. It seems that you sub-divide the electric, magnetic, and gravitational fields as one field with variations. That seems correct to me. They are different aspects of the same thing. A stationary electron has both a gravitational field and an electric field. Once you move it it also has a magnetic field. As an electron moves from one dimension to another, it generates the gravitational field. thus the magnetic field and the gravitational field are caused by motion while the electric field always exists in motion or without motion.

[phoba (OP)]

I like your pictures. It seems that you sub-divide the electric, magnetic, and gravitational fields as one field with variations. That seems correct to me. They are different aspects of the same thing. A stationary electron has both a gravitational field and an electric field. Once you move it it also has a magnetic field. As an electron moves from one dimension to another, it generates the gravitational field. thus the magnetic field and the gravitational field are caused by motion while the electric field always exists in motion or without motion.

yes, but the source of the electric field is the source of electricity ... for example a battery or power supply ..

[jerrygg38]

    That is a problem. Standard electrical theory states that a battery will have an electric field by some strange thing called space. They have never defined what space is. It just does a lot of things. However that makes no sense to me. Space is just a measurement. It is what inside of space that produces the electric field. Today I posted an understanding of the fields within space. It is what is inside space itself that produces the fields not empty space itself. space is pure nothingness.

[phoba (OP)]

That is a problem. Standard electrical theory states that a battery will have an electric field by some strange thing called space. They have never defined what space is. It just does a lot of things. However that makes no sense to me. Space is just a measurement. It is what inside of space that produces the electric field. Today I posted an understanding of the fields within space. It is what is inside space itself that produces the fields not empty space itself. space is pure nothingness.

vacuum is not a "void". The term "void" is more applicable to the content of the head, which indicates the presence of "emptiness" in nature. In space, an experiment was conducted, "an experiment in weightlessness with plasma," for visualizing the vortex structure of a magnetic field (in picture No. 2). The same structure was obtained in the conditions of the Earth. (photo No. 1) The same structure was obtained when visualizing the ultrasonic wave, the Hladini figure, the Benard cell is also all ways of visualizing this structure. There are many ways to make this structure visible, but its essence is always not a betrayal. There is a "field" around any body on the Earth, only we refer to the "magnetic field" as a magnet, and we refer to the "biological field" as applied to a living object, and we refer to the "gravitational field" as applied to a planet. "sound wave" ... By changing its name we only tie it to the object around which it exists, but it is everywhere the same and has absolutely the same essence. Imagine many different ships walking the sea. You do not call the "water of this ship" or "the water of another ship," so the field for all bodies is one. As a rule, this field is a magnetic field, or according to the old-time ether. Electricity, or else it is called an "electric field" is like a temperature, it changes the state of the structure of the earth's magnetic field. If the temperature rise changes the state of the particles, i.e. when the temperature rises they begin to rotate faster and move, then also with increasing voltage and current - the state of the same particles of the structure of the Earth's magnetic field or how it can be called an "external magnetic field" changes ... In fact, temperature and electricity change the state of the same but to different degrees. They also say that "ELECTRICITY IS A TEMPERATURE FORM".
What is an antenna? This is the same conductor ... just a piece of iron, for example a pin. The antenna simply deforms the structure of the Earth's magnetic field and it vibrates like a grid, just like a web vibrates in which a fly hits. Same thing around the speaker from which the sound comes out ... So what are the fluctuations of what is called the electromagnetic wave?
Fluctuations of the Earth's magnetic field or according to the old-scientific oscillation of the ether.
Thus, around the conductor with current, two different fields are not formed - magnetic and electromagnetic, as the "textbooks" write to us, but the already existing ALWAYS - the magnetic field of the Earth in the vortex electromagnetic state ... is being transformed ... that we SEE as honeycombs are transformed into vortices of ethers ... that is, the electric field is simply a measure of the curvature of the structure of the magnetic field in a vortex electromagnetic ... As there is no sea wave without the sea itself, so there are no electromagnetic waves without the Earth's magnetic field ...

[phoba (OP)]

http://content-27.foto.my.mail.ru/mail/phoba/159/i-174.jpg [nofollow]

[phoba (OP)]

[guest39538]

The green pyramids that are ergonomically balanced , did you design that ?

[phoba (OP)]

no, this is the ancient Egyptian god of science

[guest39538]

no, this is the ancient Egyptian god of science

Cool, clever scientist, the c.o.m being the densest point?

[phoba (OP)]

Cool, clever scientist, the c.o.m being the densest point?

I do not quite understand you

[guest39538]

Cool, clever scientist, the c.o.m being the densest point?

I do not quite understand you

The centre of mass, dead centre point, is the densest point of the mass because the ergonomically design  is ''channelling'' energy to that point?