[phoba (OP)]

One of the most important properties of the structure of the earth's magnetic field (the solar system or the universe) is that cell-vortex cells can change their size both in the direction of decreasing and in the direction of increase. For example, at a voltage of 10 volts its size is 1 mm, and at a voltage of 1000 volts the size of the vortex is already 1 meter ... Ie. if we reduce this dependence, then we will reach the size of the atoms ... and if we increase this dependence we will reach the size of the galaxies. Those. this cone is a reduced form of the solar system, where the top of the cone is this "dead point" and is itself a "micro sun". For example, when we look at a laser beam, we see a strip of luminous peaks, i.e. light shines from within space. I'm not sure that you understand me, but I still tried.

[guest39538]

One of the most important properties of the structure of the earth's magnetic field (the solar system or the universe) is that cell-vortex cells can change their size both in the direction of decreasing and in the direction of increase. For example, at a voltage of 10 volts its size is 1 mm, and at a voltage of 1000 volts the size of the vortex is already 1 meter ... Ie. if we reduce this dependence, then we will reach the size of the atoms ... and if we increase this dependence we will reach the size of the galaxies. Those. this cone is a reduced form of the solar system, where the top of the cone is this "dead point" and is itself a "micro sun". For example, when we look at a laser beam, we see a strip of luminous peaks, i.e. light shines from within space. I'm not sure that you understand me, but I still tried.

Most of that made sense to me , I will have a sleep on it then I may have some questions .

[phoba (OP)]

The reason for the formation in nature of honeycomb is always the same. In short, the earth of our planet has a magnetic field. They took a magnetic vein and watched how it behaves when the compass needle approaches. The liquid is as it were bent and gives to the arrow a rotational force as a result of the arrow points to the magnetic poles. Then they took a deeper study of this liquid. Imagine an invisible river "blowing" from one pole to the other. If you put a paddle in the river, it will rise along the river, like a wind vane along the wind. The same as the arrow of the compass - is carried away by this so to say "wind". If you look closely at this magnetic core, it will look like a honeycomb, i.e. the magnetic field of the earth is some sort of honeycomb grid that is usually not visible, but can be manifested or as scientists say visualized what we observe when we look at cells Benard, cellular basalt structures, snowflakes, crystals, cobwebs, tortoiseshell and even body cells and a bunch of all other cellular structures in the world around us. In the photo, the structure of the magnetic field of a simple magnet ... our planet also has a magnetic field and in fact the field of a magnet is the magnetic field of the earth ... Let us recall how Benar himself discovered his cells. He took lead and then drastically cooled, as a result, honeycombs appeared. The same thing happens when a volcano erupts near water - the rock drastically cools and basalt honeycombs are formed. They will not necessarily have a straight, ideal cellular shape, because the grid is dynamic. Under the dynamic structure is meant the conversion of cells into strictly ordered vortex particles. (Etherons) For example, bees initially heat the wax, i.e. in the construction of honeycombs they surround the honeycomb and "ventilate" the air increasing its temperature and the most interesting is that the bees make honeycombs round, and they become hexahedral already without bees. They seem to be stretched on a magnetic grid, something like surface tension. After all, there is simply no "surface tension force", there is always some kind of "support" on which this tension is produced. The same thing with falling water, which flying through the air and freezing - becomes honeycomb snowflakes.

[phoba (OP)]

[phoba (OP)]

There is a carrier medium on the structure of which the entire optical world is built. This medium can be called differently, magnetic, gravitational, or whatever it may be a "field", but the essence of this medium remains unchanged and always the same. From this it follows that there are no different fields, but there is one field (ether) but with different states that can be interpreted as electromagnetic, sound, torsion, lepton or some other. Consequently, there are no different particles, but there is a different structural state of the same particle, the ether, which can change its parameters only in laboratory conditions in a very wide range. For example, it can increase, decrease, change the angular velocity, the frequency of rotation of its individual sectors, and so on. The main property of this particle is that it reacts to the emotional energy of biological objects, including man. By the way that Masaru Emoto influenced the structure of water in the process of changing its state of aggregation. Same process.
Thus, what is called a "photon" always exists in space in anticipation of becoming a light, for example from a light bulb, and before it becomes a light it is not yet a photon, but an electron. That is, each specific state tied its field and its particle (for example, light-photon, gravity - graviton and so on ..) But in reality these states are countless, which means the number of elementary particles will grow endlessly or the principle will be studied changes in the state of only one particle - ether.

[mad aetherist]

I dont know much about fields & electricity, but i am thinking that u cannot get very far here if u dont read what Ivor Catt has to say (articles)(& youtube)(& google the Catt question).

[phoba (OP)]

I dont know much about fields & electricity, but i am thinking that u cannot get very far here if u dont read what Ivor Catt has to say (articles)(& youtube)(& google the Catt question).

Is there a link to the articles?

[mad aetherist]

I dont know much about fields & electricity, but i am thinking that u cannot get very far here if u dont read what Ivor Catt has to say (articles)(& youtube)(& google the Catt question).

Is there a link to the articles?

Here are a few -- i havnt checked these there might be multiple links -- youtube links at end (if them youtube links dont work then just go into youtube & search for IVOR CATT)(there are about 5 good videos).

http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x267.pdf
http://www.ptep-online.com/2016/PP-44-13.PDF
http://www.ptep-online.com/2016/PP-44-13.PDF
http://www.ivorcatt.com/1_1.htm
http://www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/07091.htm
http://www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/y7aiee.htm
http://www.ivorcatt.com/
http://www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/catanoi.htm
http://www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/08101.htm
http://www.ivorcatt.com/2698.htm
http://www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/
http://www.ivorcatt.com/em.htm
http://www.ivorcatt.com/28scan.htm
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/981.htm
http://www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/wbbanbk1.htm
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/2812.htm
http://www.ptep-online.com/2016/PP-44-13.PDF