[guest39538]

Do not bother posting in this thread if you are going to be an idiot or stupid or obtuse. 

I have posted here so I can openly discuss. 

I will start firstly with space-time

How many of you know that space-time is not a physical thing?

The curvature of space is not a real physical thing?

Einstein does not try to explain gravity? 

Einstein explains how to make a body orbit


I presume you are on the ground at the moment,  that needs no curvature but needs the linear force of gravity?

Thus proving gravity is absolutely nothing to do with any imaginary curvature of space. 


Your move.......Check mate in one  I believe, you have no move or excuses for the curved space lie.

[guest39538]

Space-time, imaginary numbers in a void of geometrical points, a point has no dimensions, a group of points has the imaginary dimensions of xyz , but still no dimension of time.  The points do not age or change.

Your move ..... check mate again I believe.

[guest39538]

Space expanding, more lies, two adjoined points of space can not  be displaced to leave space between the points.

You are displacing the points not the space



Check mate.

[jeffreyH]

Knight to king 4. Check mate.

[guest39538]

Knight to king 4. Check mate.

You have no move Jeffrey, I am not making it up am I,   it is facts that obviously show the wrongs.   

Start with space expanding, do you really think two points of space that are adjoined could stretch ? 

That is what you are saying by space is expanding. 

[guest39538]

Space is your chess board Jeffrey, bodies are your pieces.

[guest39538]

Space is the absolute constant rest frame, the pieces move around the board. 

Things move and age relative to space.  0

[guest39538]

In the beginning there was space, space is an unknown volume of geometrical points, i.e 0

[guest39538]

space cannot be created or destroyed , evidently and apparent, so logically in the beginning there was space.

Things need a space to exist in , events need a space to happen in, so logically space precedes any event  and existence.

Space  logically must also supersede any ''god''.  A ''god'' or any entity would need a space to exist in. 

[guest39538]

Any other challengers to my absolute?

Science?

Religion?

Politics?

Trolls?

You will not win this game of chess.

[jeffreyH]

You aren't playing chess. You are using the idea of chess to emphasise a number of points. You are showing conceit.

[guest39538]

conceit.

I would not say conceit, more annoyed that I do not seem to be getting anywhere when on a lot of things I am obviously right.

[guest39538]

No challengers?  An outright victory?

Please show me where my logic is wrong, I would love to be proved wrong then I can give up.

[Colin2B]

Your logic is wrong if you assume No challengers = An outright victory

It could be most people don’t care what you do or do not believe.

[guest39538]

Your logic is wrong if you assume No challengers = An outright victory

It could be most people don’t care what you do or do not believe.

People should care about the truth.  There is no challengers because I am simply correct. 

If you in some way think the logic is flawed , then please explain Colin, where it is flawed?

How about I and you get into a serious discussion and start with space is expanding?

Let us define x which is two adjoining points A and B .   <AB>

Now if A and B were to expand ,  <A.....B> 

Quite clearly there is space between the two points.

If we was to consider this space, we know the space is not stretched space, we know it is not new space, we know we have created a length of space by shifting the points.

If we was to contract the points  <...AB...>

The space remains outside of the points.

Quite clearly space cannot expand.


Added -  Field density can expand proportional to the magnitude of source.

[guest39538]

dfd.jpg (66.42 kB . 1914x907 - viewed 4037 times)

[Bored chemist]

Please show me where my logic is wrong, I would love to be proved wrong then I can give up.

When did you adopt this refreshing new policy?

[Colin2B]

People should care about the truth. 

I care about the truth, which is why I don’t care what you say.

There is no challengers because I am simply correct. 

If you in some way think the logic is flawed , then please explain Colin, where it is flawed?

The fact that I am not going to engage shows your logic is flawed.
End of.
Bye

[guest39538]

People should care about the truth. 

I care about the truth, which is why I don’t care what you say.

There is no challengers because I am simply correct. 

If you in some way think the logic is flawed , then please explain Colin, where it is flawed?

The fact that I am not going to engage shows your logic is flawed.
End of.
Bye

Hilarious, not even a counter argument of any description what so ever. 

Ok, you say it is flawed, then you should be able to provide the reasons it is flawed? 

No doubt you cannot that is why you state end of, because you know you can't.  End of, I have proven science wrong yet again and again.  You ignore the truth is the facts and play make believe.

[guest39538]

Please show me where my logic is wrong, I would love to be proved wrong then I can give up.

When did you adopt this refreshing new policy?

Is that a counter argument or to change the discussion ?

Try again