[Bored chemist]

A+B=1

There you go plain and simple. There is better writers than me who will write it up .

Plain, yes.
Simple, yes
Meaningful, No
And since it has no meaning, nobody can write it up for you

[guest39538]

A+B=1

There you go plain and simple. There is better writers than me who will write it up .

Plain, yes.
Simple, yes
Meaningful, No
And since it has no meaning, nobody can write it up for you

A = 0.5
B = 0.5

  = 1 = t

P = ∞

ok?

added-

=   +  +


Abstract

0.5→k←0.5

0.5 + 0.5 / k

[Bored chemist]

Why is t always 1?
Why is k always 1?
What are t and k?
What's P and why is it always infinite?

...
and so on.
Like I said; it makes no sense.

[guest39538]

In the beginning there was an unknown volume of nothingness.   

Any given point of the unknown volume having 0 properties

Any given point of the unknown volume being a singularity in that it can have infinite dimensions.

Any given point of the unknown volume being under an infinite magnitude of zero point pressure .

Every action has an equal and opposite reaction

The opposite reaction to nothing is something

any given point manifests a mono pole electrostatic charge that dissipates

A/k and B/k

alpha waves and beta waves like ''strings''.

then at a single given point simultaneous manifests A+B which retains form and starts in an instant to expand by sucking in A and B from k

[guest39538]

Why is t always 1?
Why is k always 1?
What are t and k?
What's P and why is it always infinite?

P is probability , 1 is four dimensions .  t is time and k is space

0+0³=1

[guest39538]

Calculate P for A+B simultaneously manifesting at the same geometrical point of  infinite k

P A + B / k = infinite

1/k₀ where there is an infinite number of 0 points.

[guest39538]

Try this thought experiment

Write A on your left palm and B on your right palm

Then close both hands 

Open your left hand A/k

Open your right  hand B/k


Now imagine between your hands A+B happens,

Now clap your hands really hard and ''hear'' and ''see''  the big bang.


A→→AB←←B

[guest39538]

They should of called it the Big inflation, the rest of the story , you know.

[Bored chemist]

It doesn't make sense to have an infinite probability so your "theory" (really, i't's not even a hypothesis) is wrong
We can close the thread now.

[guest39538]

It doesn't make sense to have an infinite probability so your "theory" (really, i't's not even a hypothesis) is wrong
We can close the thread now.

It makes no sense to have an infinite probability yet I have demonstrated it mathematically and physically.

Nope, I am correct it is the only way to get something from nothing and a big bang.

[guest39538]

I have a single red point and place it amongst an infinite amount of points, I ask you to random pick a point,

What is your chance of picking the red point?


1/∞ chance

I already know.

[Bored chemist]

I have a single red point and place it amongst an infinite amount of points, I ask you to random pick a point,

What is your chance of picking the red point?


1/∞ chance

I already know.

Practically zero.
And if you have a bunch of  points all of which are red and you ask me to pick one then the chance of me picking a red one is 1
All probabilities fall in the range zero to one.
0<= P <= 1
Which is why your "theory" which says that it's infinity is wrong.

[guest39538]

I have a single red point and place it amongst an infinite amount of points, I ask you to random pick a point,

What is your chance of picking the red point?


1/∞ chance

I already know.

Practically zero.
And if you have a bunch of  points all of which are red and you ask me to pick one then the chance of me picking a red one is 1
All probabilities fall in the range zero to one.
0<= P <= 1
Which is why your "theory" which says that it's infinity is wrong.

When 0 is an infinite whole , it is applicable. You are incorrect and my maths is correct.

>0=1

[Bored chemist]

When 0 is an infinite whole , it is applicable.

Back to good old word salad again I see.
It's still not going to cut it as science.

It doe rather give the lie to your earlier assertion that

A+B=1

There you go plain and simple. There is better writers than me who will write it up .

[guest39538]

When 0 is an infinite whole , it is applicable.

Back to good old word salad again I see.
It's still not going to cut it as science.

Which part do you not understand about an infinite amount of geometrical points? 

Any given point having a precise value of zero.  In other words , you can move one point along and the value remains zero.

[guest39538]

The 0.5 + 0.5 way is the simple way

A = electron

B = proton


Then the other ways is in a way of fields which is for the expert user.

A=-0.5

B=0.5

Yes to understand , you have to accept and understand 1 = 0 and 0 =1 and 1+1=1

A = (-0.5) = (0.5) =(1)

B= (0.5) = (0.5) = (1)

[guest39538]

1 electron is half of an atom which is half of zero charge.

[Bored chemist]

You still can't have a probability more than 1 so you are still wrong.

Yes to understand , you have to accept and understand 1 = 0

That could be an issue sciencewise.

[Bored chemist]

1 electron is half of an atom which is half of zero charge.

Nope, an electron is (at most) about 1/2000 of an atom by mass.
Your theory seems to be a theory of nothing.
Why not just accept that?

[guest39538]

1 electron is half of an atom which is half of zero charge.

Nope, an electron is (at most) about 1/2000 of an atom by mass.
Your theory seems to be a theory of nothing.
Why not just accept that?

A theory of nothing, yes you got that right , space is nothing alright.. Anyway not bothered T.O.E is old news to me now, I am on something better like ''cold'' energy.