[opportunity (OP)]

That's a good manoeuvre.

[guest39538]

That's a good manoeuvre.

I think I just need to write T.O.E right ?  My theory does explain everything based on a Universe that's entire components are ''light'' energy with the exception of the independence of an absolute spacial void . 

You know a proton does not have a charge, the proton is the charge.

[opportunity (OP)]

And the mass of the proton....you probably have an answer for, as a concept of charge, right?

[guest39538]

And the mass of the proton....you probably have an answer for, as a concept of charge, right?

The mass of the proton is a consequent of an electron. 

[opportunity (OP)]

And yet both can be isolated from one another "in reality", right, independent. Not "consequent", right?

[guest39538]

And yet both can be isolated from one another "in reality", right, independent. Not "consequent", right?

I think quantum entanglement would disagree that there is ever an isolation. The individual existence of a proton or electron without an ''enclosure'' force also being questionable.

[guest39538]

enclosure force.jpg (21.82 kB . 535x503 - viewed 2466 times)

[opportunity (OP)]

UM, this is why I'm worried about physics and new-ideas in this forum, its like double jeopardy.

Can't win, can't talk....its dumb.


Very funny though.

[guest39538]

UM, this is why I'm worried about physics and new-ideas in this forum, its like double jeopardy.

Can't win, can't talk....its dumb.


Very funny though.

It is hard for science, people read ambiguity all the time.

[guest39538]

And yet both can be isolated from one another "in reality", right, independent. Not "consequent", right?

I have re-thought my stance on this, both can be isolated in reality, I believe you are right.