The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. The Graviton?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

The Graviton?

  • 50 Replies
  • 2169 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mike_Cobley (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 3
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
The Graviton?
« on: 25/06/2018 08:16:12 »
Hey all

Quick question for you. I hear all the time, 'the elusive gravity particle' . But why do we even need one? Doesn't Einstein's General theory describe gravity as mass warping space/time. So, i thought of gravity more like rivers within the sea. You get pulled 'along' but there is no particle per-se that does that pulling.

Or am i completely off base here?

Rgds
Logged
Published Works:
'The Eyes of the Devil' -http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B013EIINQM
'The Shadow Grounds' -https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07CHM9ZDY
Currently working: - 'Anomaly' Sci-Fi  - save the world type, 'NeverLeave' - horror, and 'A Meeting of Worlds' fantasy.
 



Online evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6839
  • Activity:
    57%
  • Thanked: 697 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #1 on: 25/06/2018 11:00:01 »
Quote from: Mike_Cobley
why do we even need (a graviton)?
You can understand an electric current, and wire together batteries and electric motors without knowing anything about an "electric particle". In fact, Michael Faraday did just that.

But when you get down to steering electrons traveling through a vacuum (needed to build an old-fashioned TV tube) or manipulating small numbers of electrons and their precise energy levels (needed to build a transistor), you need to understand the electric particle (electron) in far more detail.

You can build things as big as a Solar System, or as small as a neutron star (which has pretty much the same mass) using Einstein's General theory of relativity. You can detect gravitational waves using the same theory.

But when you get down to the gravitational field close to the event horizon of a black hole, Einstein's General Relativity comes up with infinities that physicists have not been able to get around. So physicists (including Stephen Hawking) want to know more about what happens in this environment.

Since quantum theory has managed to resolve some other contradictions in electromagnetism, it is thought that a quantum theory might be able to resolve some contradictions in gravity.

"Graviton" is the name given to this hypothetical particle. There is even a quantum description of this hypothetical particle that would have the right properties: a spin-2 boson.

Most physicists think that a Graviton probably exists, but its energy is so low that current technologies cannot detect individual gravitons. Assuming the graviton exists, we can generate them easily enough by accelerating small masses, but they fly off in all directions at the speed of light. Today, we have nothing equivalent to a "gravitational insulator", so we are unable to bend the graviton to our will.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton
« Last Edit: 25/06/2018 11:38:36 by evan_au »
Logged
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6262
  • Activity:
    18.5%
  • Thanked: 155 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #2 on: 27/06/2018 21:34:26 »
Photons can be reflected. What about gravitons? Can they be deflected by interactions with other particles? This is moot to a large extent since a gravitational field needs no acceleration to exist and have an effect on objects. We can think in terms of virtual gravitons for purposes of theorising but it is much more abstract than that. The field may have quanta but that will not answer the important questions.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline Mike_Cobley (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 3
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #3 on: 28/06/2018 09:39:09 »
So, if I get this right. Because of the contradictions with gravity, in some situations we need to describe it as a particle to overcome these? Apologies if i miss understood.

Rgds
Logged
Published Works:
'The Eyes of the Devil' -http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B013EIINQM
'The Shadow Grounds' -https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07CHM9ZDY
Currently working: - 'Anomaly' Sci-Fi  - save the world type, 'NeverLeave' - horror, and 'A Meeting of Worlds' fantasy.
 

Online evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6839
  • Activity:
    57%
  • Thanked: 697 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #4 on: 28/06/2018 10:13:08 »
Quote from: Mike_Cobley
Because of the contradictions with gravity, in some situations we need to describe it as a particle to overcome these?
Special Relativity does have contradictions near a black hole.

Theoretical Physicists working on String Theory have constructed a model of a graviton which exactly matches Special Relativity - including the contradictions near a black hole.

I am sure those researchers are now working on a variant of their theory which agrees with Special Relativity wherever we can measure it, but doesn't have contradictions near a black hole.

Unfortunately, finding out what really happens near a black hole may require us to go to a black hole - a trip I, for one would not be volunteering for!
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory#Applications_to_quantum_gravity
Logged
 



guest45734

  • Guest
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #5 on: 28/06/2018 10:28:01 »
If nothing gets out of BH, how does a graviton virtual or otherwise get out. Also if gravitons are radiated by matter away from mass why dont they push other masses away.
Is it better to view vurtual gravitons as appearing in space and being absobed by mass creating an inflow rather than outflow.
Logged
 

Online evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6839
  • Activity:
    57%
  • Thanked: 697 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #6 on: 28/06/2018 22:30:48 »
Quote from: dead cat
If nothing gets out of BH, how does a graviton virtual or otherwise get out.
Gravitons represent energy propagating away through space at the speed of light.

However, left to itself, the gravitational field around a black hole is a static thing which radiates no energy, so there are no real gravitons.

When an object (like a neutron star) orbits a black hole, gravitational energy is radiated away through space. But you could imagine this as originating from the space between the two objects, rather than being emitted from within the black hole's event horizon.

Quote
if gravitons are radiated by matter away from mass why don't they push other masses away
The effects of a single graviton are much like the effects of a gravitational wave (only much, much tinier). The gravitational waves we have detected are effectively just very many in-phase gravitons, arriving in massive bunches.

Gravitational waves don't push matter away, since they are not actually absorbed by matter, and don't deliver any linear momentum.

Gravitational waves act to twist space in one direction, and then twist it back to the original position. They slightly accelerate time, and then decelerate it, back to the original rate. So overall, everything is left back where (and when) it was before the gravitational wave arrived.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave#Introduction
Logged
 

Online evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6839
  • Activity:
    57%
  • Thanked: 697 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #7 on: 28/06/2018 22:44:42 »
Quote from: jeffreyH
Photons can be reflected. What about gravitons?
For something to be a generally useful technology, we need methods to:
1. Manufacture/generate it
2. Manipulate/modify it
3. Monitor/detect/use it

Unfortunately:
1. It takes at least a pair of neutron stars to manufacture a significant number of gravitons. Currently out of our league.
2. Gravitons affect space and time, rather than matter, so they are currently impossible to manipulate
3. Our smallest detectors are about 4 miles long, and even then have extreme problems detecting trillions of gravitons arriving at once, in phase.

So graviton technology is not yet ready for general use by members of the public.

I expect that black holes will deflect gravitons, just like they deflect photons. So maybe one day we may be able to do graviton spectroscopy by diffracting them with an array of micro-black holes?
Logged
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6262
  • Activity:
    18.5%
  • Thanked: 155 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #8 on: 28/06/2018 22:55:34 »
@evan_au I thought I'd throw that one in for good measure.  ;)
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 15409
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 43 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
4Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #9 on: 29/06/2018 23:42:35 »
I think you're right :)
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline geordief

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 309
  • Activity:
    4.5%
  • Thanked: 6 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #10 on: 02/07/2018 14:15:44 »
Very interesting to learn that gravitational waves may be made of gravitons in phase (so like photons in that respect?

Can gravitons be understood as an excitation in a particular wave ? (maybe said gravitational wave?)
Logged
 

guest45734

  • Guest
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #11 on: 03/07/2018 10:30:17 »
Quote from: evan_au on 28/06/2018 22:30:48
However, left to itself, the gravitational field around a black hole is a static thing which radiates no energy, so there are no real gravitons.

Just to confirm, the graviton spin 2 boson, theorized to exist, https://phys.org/news/2014-03-elusive-graviton.html DOES NOT EXIST.

Are you stating the Graviton is a virtual particle which has a very short life time existing momentarily in space, like a quantum fluctuation of quantum foam.

:) Can you confirm is it the earth/mass/energy that sucks or is it the graviton/virtual particle that sucks :)

Logged
 

guest45734

  • Guest
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #12 on: 03/07/2018 10:37:13 »
Quote from: evan_au on 28/06/2018 22:44:42
3. Our smallest detectors are about 4 miles long, and even then have extreme problems detecting trillions of gravitons arriving at once, in phase.

Do you view the gravitional waves detected by ligo as an reduced density of gravitons followed by an an increased density of gravitons creating a contraction and expansion of space , OR do you view it as a stretch of space time to view the graviton as being the cause of the apparent curvature of space.

Could the Graviton and Dark Energy be the same thing?
Logged
 



Offline Janus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 458
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 131 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #13 on: 03/07/2018 16:03:24 »
Quote from: geordief on 02/07/2018 14:15:44
Very interesting to learn that gravitational waves may be made of gravitons in phase (so like photons in that respect?

Can gravitons be understood as an excitation in a particular wave ? (maybe said gravitational wave?)
Gravitons in a quantum gravity theory would fulfill the same role as photons do in Quantum Electrodynamics.
So in the same way as electromagnetic radiation (light, radio waves, x-rays etc) are made up of photons of particular discreet energies depending on the frequency of the electromagnetic wave,   Gravitational waves would be made up of gravitons of discreet energies.
And in the same way as the electromagnetic field is mediated by virtual photons in Quantum Electrodynamics, virtual gravitons would mediate the gravitational field.
Logged
 

Offline geordief

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 309
  • Activity:
    4.5%
  • Thanked: 6 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #14 on: 03/07/2018 16:20:20 »
Quote from: Janus on 03/07/2018 16:03:24
Quote from: geordief on 02/07/2018 14:15:44
Very interesting to learn that gravitational waves may be made of gravitons in phase (so like photons in that respect?

Can gravitons be understood as an excitation in a particular wave ? (maybe said gravitational wave?)
Gravitons in a quantum gravity theory would fulfill the same role as photons do in Quantum Electrodynamics.
So in the same way as electromagnetic radiation (light, radio waves, x-rays etc) are made up of photons of particular discreet energies depending on the frequency of the electromagnetic wave,   Gravitational waves would be made up of gravitons of discreet energies.
And in the same way as the electromagnetic field is mediated by virtual photons in Quantum Electrodynamics, virtual gravitons would mediate the gravitational field.
So there could possibly be more  or less  energetic  varieties of gravitons   ?

And anti gravitons  might be included in the particle soup?
« Last Edit: 03/07/2018 16:23:52 by geordief »
Logged
 

Offline Janus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 458
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 131 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #15 on: 03/07/2018 16:29:07 »
Quote from: dead cat on 03/07/2018 10:37:13
Quote from: evan_au on 28/06/2018 22:44:42
3. Our smallest detectors are about 4 miles long, and even then have extreme problems detecting trillions of gravitons arriving at once, in phase.

Do you view the gravitional waves detected by ligo as an reduced density of gravitons followed by an an increased density of gravitons creating a contraction and expansion of space ,
No.  That would be the equivalent of saying that an electromagnetic wave is caused by a varying density of photons.( such a varying density would actually be the result of an additional modulation of the electromagnetic waves, such as we use in AM radio, where we modulate the strength of the carrier wave to encode information onto it.)
Quote
OR do you view it as a stretch of space time to view the graviton as being the cause of the apparent curvature of space.
Quote
the frequency/wavelength would be due to the energy of the discreet gravtions, while the magnitude would be due to number of gravitons per sec.( The number of gravitons arriving per sec can be constant and you would still measure a sequential compression and stretching of spacetime with a frequency equal to that of the individual gravitons)
Quote
Could the Graviton and Dark Energy be the same thing?

No.
Logged
 

Offline Janus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 458
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 131 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #16 on: 03/07/2018 16:38:55 »
Quote from: geordief on 03/07/2018 16:20:20
Quote from: Janus on 03/07/2018 16:03:24
Quote from: geordief on 02/07/2018 14:15:44
Very interesting to learn that gravitational waves may be made of gravitons in phase (so like photons in that respect?

Can gravitons be understood as an excitation in a particular wave ? (maybe said gravitational wave?)
Gravitons in a quantum gravity theory would fulfill the same role as photons do in Quantum Electrodynamics.
So in the same way as electromagnetic radiation (light, radio waves, x-rays etc) are made up of photons of particular discreet energies depending on the frequency of the electromagnetic wave,   Gravitational waves would be made up of gravitons of discreet energies.
And in the same way as the electromagnetic field is mediated by virtual photons in Quantum Electrodynamics, virtual gravitons would mediate the gravitational field.
So there could possibly be more  or less  energetic  varieties of gravitons   ?
in a quantum gravity theory, this would be a requirement.   Look at the LIGO detection of gravitational waves, and you will see a correlation between wave strength and frequency.   This is because as the BHs orbited closer and closer to each other, the frequency of the Gravitation waves (which was tied to the Orbital period of the BHs) became higher and higher along with the strain measured by LIGO.  Higher frequency Gravitational waves are more energetic in the same way that higher frequency electromagnetic waves are. In a quantum gravity theory, this would mean that higher frequency gravitons are more energetic than lower frequency ones
Quote

And anti gravitons  might be included in the particle soup?
No, because, like photons, gravitons would be their own anti-particle.
Logged
 



Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6262
  • Activity:
    18.5%
  • Thanked: 155 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #17 on: 03/07/2018 18:47:47 »
If antimatter interacts with gravity in the same way as matter does, and it's my guess that it does, then gravity was instrumental in bringing both types together to annihilate in the early stages of the big bang. That there is an asymmetry between matter and antimatter is a mystery. If there were less of an effect of gravity on antimatter by even a tiny amount, then that would be interesting. Very unlikely though.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Online evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6839
  • Activity:
    57%
  • Thanked: 697 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #18 on: 03/07/2018 23:07:00 »
Quote from: dead cat
Are you stating the Graviton is a virtual particle which has a very short life time existing momentarily in space, like a quantum fluctuation of quantum foam.
All virtual particles (including virtual photons and virtual gravitons) have a short lifetime and limited range, limited by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

However, real gravitons propagate away to infinity, as oscillations on the gravitational field. This is what LIGO detected. (And real photons propagate away to infinity, as oscillations on the electromagnetic field. This is what telescopes detect.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_particle

Quote from: Janus
Look at the LIGO detection of gravitational waves, and you will see a correlation between wave strength and frequency
But correlation does not prove causation.

In this case, both the amplitude increase and frequency are also correlated with a third variable: distance.
- As the black holes spiral closer together, their distance decreases
- When they are closer, their orbital period decreases (ie the frequency increases)
- When they are closer, much more power is emitted as gravitational waves

But the trend is certainly valid - gravitational waves of higher frequency (ie gravitons of shorter wavelength) will carry more momentum. The same relationship is true of photons.
Logged
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6262
  • Activity:
    18.5%
  • Thanked: 155 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: The Graviton?
« Reply #19 on: 04/07/2018 21:44:08 »
At the moment I am investigating wavelength as it relates to the time dilation of the source of the radiation. So a wave strength and frequency correlation may be explainable.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

How can a graviton escape from a Black Hole?

Started by FredBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 20
Views: 8237
Last post 05/02/2009 14:04:39
by ...lets split up...
What is the relationship of the Higgs Boson to the graviton?

Started by @/anticBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 1
Views: 2816
Last post 07/07/2012 10:20:31
by Soul Surfer
Does dark matter and the graviton exist?

Started by IzzieCBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 13
Views: 1307
Last post 22/03/2018 08:16:04
by guest45734
Graviton emission and absorption?

Started by KryptidBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 5
Views: 6498
Last post 08/12/2005 12:41:50
by DoctorBeaver
How does physics explain the graviton?

Started by Chemistry4meBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 53
Views: 13576
Last post 17/03/2009 19:18:33
by Vern
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.136 seconds with 81 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.