The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Discussion experiment - please join in , all welcome
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Discussion experiment - please join in , all welcome

  • 8 Replies
  • 3329 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest39538

  • Guest
Discussion experiment - please join in , all welcome
« on: 02/07/2018 19:00:11 »
Are these theories all discussing the same thing ?


* exper.jpg (38.83 kB . 1146x766 - viewed 2627 times)



Logged
 



Marked as best answer by on 30/07/2024 06:25:31

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Discussion experiment - please join in , all welcome
« Reply #1 on: 02/07/2018 21:07:23 »
No, because one of them- the N field- is made up nonsense.

That's it; that is the end of the thread unless you want to ignore science.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Discussion experiment - please join in , all welcome
« Reply #2 on: 02/07/2018 21:17:23 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 02/07/2018 21:07:23
No, because one of them- the N field- is made up nonsense.

That's it; that is the end of the thread unless you want to ignore science.

Well , the N-field does not ignore science, the N-field combines the other three.  So does that mean you declare the other three, also nonsense?

P.s I would also like to add Bogie-smiles ISU model into the ''mix'' and discussion.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Discussion experiment - please join in , all welcome
« Reply #3 on: 03/07/2018 07:12:34 »
Quote from: Thebox on 02/07/2018 21:17:23
So does that mean you declare the other three, also nonsense?
No, that's just a straw man you made up.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Discussion experiment - please join in , all welcome
« Reply #4 on: 03/07/2018 07:38:03 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 03/07/2018 07:12:34
Quote from: Thebox on 02/07/2018 21:17:23
So does that mean you declare the other three, also nonsense?
No, that's just a straw man you made up.
Like a scarecrow ?  :)

I stopped writing the N-field theory because I think I was just explaining what you already know in your own terms. 
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Discussion experiment - please join in , all welcome
« Reply #5 on: 03/07/2018 18:36:53 »
Quote from: Thebox on 03/07/2018 07:38:03
Quote from: Bored chemist on 03/07/2018 07:12:34
Quote from: Thebox on 02/07/2018 21:17:23
So does that mean you declare the other three, also nonsense?
No, that's just a straw man you made up.
Like a scarecrow ?  :)

I stopped writing the N-field theory because I think I was just explaining what you already know in your own terms. 
If that was true, then you would be saying the the N theory is nothing new- so it's useless.

In fact, you didn't explain anything. You just posted cartoons + bad maths.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Discussion experiment - please join in , all welcome
« Reply #6 on: 03/07/2018 22:01:40 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 03/07/2018 18:36:53
Quote from: Thebox on 03/07/2018 07:38:03
Quote from: Bored chemist on 03/07/2018 07:12:34
Quote from: Thebox on 02/07/2018 21:17:23
So does that mean you declare the other three, also nonsense?
No, that's just a straw man you made up.
Like a scarecrow ?  :)

I stopped writing the N-field theory because I think I was just explaining what you already know in your own terms. 
If that was true, then you would be saying the the N theory is nothing new- so it's useless.

In fact, you didn't explain anything. You just posted cartoons + bad maths.

Well I give up on science, with my bad ideas and meaningless math ,  I am going go back painting and be a society robot .  I tried....
Logged
 

guest4091

  • Guest
Re: Discussion experiment - please join in , all welcome
« Reply #7 on: 16/07/2018 16:13:01 »
Why are we encouraged to think 'outside the box'?
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Discussion experiment - please join in , all welcome
« Reply #8 on: 16/07/2018 17:00:13 »
Quote from: phyti on 16/07/2018 16:13:01
Why are we encouraged to think 'outside the box'?
If only our thinking on our own dna coding was as clear as thinking 'outside the box'.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.257 seconds with 44 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.