[guest39538]

Which proves that you are a mathematically illiterate fool.

I don't mean to sound rude, but obviously you do not understand if you think the maths is meaningless and illiterate.  The maths works with my conceptual envision I have explained with theory .  The NFEU model does not ignore present Physics, to the contrary the model is based on some of the present physics such as Coulombs law, space-time and Dirac. I think you are possibly not considering Alpha or Beta point energy particle manifestations , popping into and out of existence , the dissipate resulting in dispersion to 0 value.

This is like a child saying 'you can't speak to my imaginary friend because they use a language that only I can understand'.

Shhh, they might here you    Seriously though, think how long relativity etc as been around and people still do not understand that .  I would not expect anybody to automatic accept my theory without actually understanding it.  I am not totally sure, but I think the NFEU model is one of a kind and as not been done before.  It may have a few glitches as I am writing live and have done no real editing as yet.  As you are only really questioning the maths I assume you have no objection and understand the actual theory .  I have recently changed the maths to a different version, do you understand that version ?

[Bored chemist]

Come back with a clear explanation of the maths you are using.

[Bored chemist]

I assume you have no objection and understand the actual theory . 

It is , as I have pointed out, impossible to judge the theory because it makes no sense.
It won't make sense unless, and until, you provide the maths.

[guest39538]

I assume you have no objection and understand the actual theory .

It is , as I have pointed out, impossible to judge the theory because it makes no sense.
It won't make sense unless, and until, you provide the maths.

I have provided the maths......anyway , net gone off again already, got 50 quid council tax bill to find, school uniforms and have 0 in money. I think I have spent enough on  science  with the internet over the years, a poor investment of time and money. I might as well quit for good. Laters dude I think I might take up street robbery or something, I don't see hard criminals struggling for cash on the streets why I sit here learning , learning how to waste my time and money .

[guest39538]

Stuff  it why I am steaming I might as well let it out , neuroselfish aholes cause the neurojealousy in others, it is not that people mind the rich , it is the riches slice of the pie is too big. Neurogreed and they are going to hell. The rich are the cause of lots of crime by inducing neurohate in the poor by flaunti g their riches in our faces. Gold toilets, you got to be shitti g me when there is starving people and homeless, hell even awaits the church, good is not good, good is More evil than most bad. It is not evil to steal to feed a family, it is evil to allow this family to be I  that position, yes YOU are the cause not us....I believe in God, but my god would never allow a single war, a single homeless person, a hungry person and likes. YOU HAVE NOT GOT A CLUE ABOUT WHAT GOD WANTS...thats right , I do have and feel the holy spirit , my guiding light fights many , I feel , can you remember what it was like to feel? No one even feels enough to giving me a part time job working from home, I am obviously able to do a job , not like I am begging although desperate, willing to work for a wage . Sorry forum stressed , homeless guy on my settee and lots of stress, head wants to explode i swear.

[Bored chemist]

I have provided the maths.

No, you have not.
You have not provided an explanation of what you claim, not ay way of generalising it.

[guest39538]

I have provided the maths.

No, you have not.
You have not provided an explanation of what you claim, not ay way of generalising it.

Dude think about what we are discussing here , it is not rocket science, the next time I manage get some cash, whenever I don't know, how about we meet for coffee and I tell you all about it.  . I will catch a train ....I can show you using a salt shaker in a cafe....then you can help with the maths then we go get noble prize , joint effort.

[Bored chemist]

you can help with the maths

Unlike you , I understand how difficult that would be.
I'm not going to waste my  time on it.
If you really think you can then start off with this new variation of maths where zero is no longer the identity operator under addition.
Show us how it works, then, when people can understand it, try to show how it works in this nwe idea you have.

Start with the basics.

[guest39538]

you can help with the maths

Unlike you , I understand how difficult that would be.
I'm not going to waste my  time on it.
If you really think you can then start off with this new variation of maths where zero is no longer the identity operator under addition.
Show us how it works, then, when people can understand it, try to show how it works in this nwe idea you have.

Start with the basics.

Take a salt shaker and shake some salt particles onto a plate,  the particles separate , are divided , ask your self what divides these particles ? Answer is space....Sorry dude it is a struggle post proper without my pc , and I am under a lot of stress, did you know a school uniform costs over 100 quid because of school emblems on jumpers etc, times 2 in the household..   I'm fuming by this ....

Added , take a sphere, slit into 4 segments, split each segment into four, keep repeati g, eventually you are left with 0 degrees.

[guest39538]

++=

[Bored chemist]

eventually you are left with 0 degrees.

No, you are not.

[Bored chemist]

++=

Trivialy false unless n=1
multiply both sides by n
You get a+b +aⁿ +bⁿ = 2aⁿ +2bⁿ
and that only works for n=1
This is the problem- your maths isn't good enough to deal with the stuff we do know (and learned at school), yet you think you can do better.

[guest39538]

++=

Trivialy false unless n=1
multiply both sides by n
You get a+b +aⁿ +bⁿ = 2aⁿ +2bⁿ
and that only works for n=1
This is the problem- your maths isn't good enough to deal with the stuff we do know (and learned at school), yet you think you can do better.

You did not learn my theory at school and you don't know this stuff , one of a kind my friend . You are correct n=1 and is a dimensional whole I.e infinite.  Or to put another way a singularity , one space. I have explained the maths three different ways now , do we really need a forth way or even a fith  way to explain it ? The last equation is infinity.

P.s trying put my internet back on, speak proper soon, I learnt myself this stuff on line, mainly here.Neurodynamics of cognitive thought is the NGI construct of one's own self belief.

[Bored chemist]

You did not learn my theory at school

And, since you flatly refuse (or are unable) to explain it here, nobody is ever going to learn about it.

Come back when something changes.

[guest39538]

You did not learn my theory at school

And, since you flatly refuse (or are unable) to explain it here, nobody is ever going to learn about it.

Come back when something changes.

It is explained , it is not difficult to understand, but to add.

The NFEU reminds us at this stage that the initial universe is proposed to be an infinite volume of nothingness that contained no thing. 
Additionally the NFEU model proposed that the rudiment energy and ongoing power of the universe was an electrostatic point charge that dissipates into the infinite space,
 reducing in magnitude by being dispersed to a ''point''  where the values become 0.  The NFEU model also proposed the process is multiple and give name of micro bangs
which resulted in either Alpha or Beta waves dissipate from self annihilation, this reflecting on the Dirac notion of particles popping into and out of existence.
In preliminary acceptance of this, the model then further deducts a simultaneous process , where the Alpha point and Beta point charge manifest at the
 same geometrical point to form a binary energy particle which we give name, the binary energy C particle. Continuing from this, the NFEU model proposed that on the instant
of manifestation of the binary energy C particle, the pre-existing alpha and beta wave dissipate energy, centripetally is attracted to the binary energy C particle.
This energy then adding to the binary energy C particle, to increase the mass and form an expanded Black hole neutral electrical  field . The model then goes on to explain the
binary energy C particle reaches critical mass to the eventuality of a big bang.

To add a further set of maths explaining the same thing....

+ +

[Bored chemist]

It is explained

Where?

Do you think you can teach a child what multiplication means by just telling them that 123 * 456 = 56008 ?
That's more or less what you have done here.
You have given a single example, and not explained how you got to the answer.

Show your working.

[guest39538]

It is explained

Where?

Do you think you can teach a child what multiplication means by just telling them that 123 * 456 = 56008 ?
That's more or less what you have done here.
You have given a single example, and not explained how you got to the answer.

Show your working.

I have shown my working.

I assigned values to my theory actions to give me something to work with, then I just needed to put order to the chaos  of values. Was not that difficult to create some working maths.

Example ; I give the value A to a negative electrostatic charge,the negative charge disperses into space which I gave value K or n, doesnt really matter, so A/n explains that part. Then so on...

added-

E₁/n

then

E₂/n


That gives us the quanta ''soup'' that then needs to reform. So then I just needed to find a reformer ,

E₁ + E₂   /  t   or n

Which makes gravity work and makes the ''soup'' attracted to the reformer.

[Bored chemist]

I assigned values to

As I said, it's like assigning the value 55088 to 123 * 456.

You failed to explain why you chose that value.

[guest39538]

I assigned values to

As I said, it's like assigning the value 55088 to 123 * 456.

You failed to explain why you chose that value.

Huh?  I am not following you, I used my values because they were the values to use , are you trying to say I am giving the answer without the question ? Which I am not....

[Bored chemist]

I used my values because they were the values to use ,

Why?

are you trying to say I am giving the answer without the question ?

Yes, or at least, without explaining why the answer answers the question.

If I tell you that the trace of the matrix
1 0
0 1
is 2 then what I'm telling you is right, but it doesn't tell you what a trace is.
And, if I talk about "trace analysis" people are going to think in terms of chemistry, rather than maths unless I make it clear.


What you have done is make up meanings for well recognised symbols like "+" and use them for something else- without being able to explain what that "something" is and without, it seems, even recognising that you need to explain it.

Until you realise you are failing, you are not going to succeed.