[guest39538]

2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .

Do you know what anions and cations are?

2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .


Take 4 in example , the equilibrium phase  flux range is decimal 3 to 5

Do you know what cations and anions are?

The last sentence is your usual word salad nonsense, pigeon.

Of course I know what anions and cations are, the last sentence is not nonsense, again , you have just not heard it before so at this time do not understand it . I am not trying to be awkward...

[The Spoon]

2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .

Do you know what anions and cations are?

2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .


Take 4 in example , the equilibrium phase  flux range is decimal 3 to 5

Do you know what cations and anions are?

The last sentence is your usual word salad nonsense, pigeon.

Of course I know what anions and cations are, the last sentence is not nonsense, again , you have just not heard it before so at this time do not understand it . I am not trying to be awkward...

Explain what you think anions and cations are are then.
When I read a book I always encounter sentences that I have not read before - they make sense. If that sentence makes sense then explain it.

[guest39538]

This is not how maths works - it is a common language

Hmm, sorry but maths works the way we make it fit, that is how all maths works.  Are you saying that I and you are not presently divided by space ?  Think about that ...

[guest39538]

Explain what you think anions and cations are are then.

Positive or negative charged atoms....

Like A + B = H (hydrogen), not a sentence related to the above.

[The Spoon]

This is not how maths works - it is a common language

Hmm, sorry but maths works the way we make it fit, that is how all maths works.  Are you saying that I and you are not presently divided by space ?  Think about that ...

That is obviously nonsense. You seem to not understand what division is in mathematics.

[The Spoon]

Explain what you think anions and cations are are then.

Positive or negative charged atoms....

Like A + B = H (hydrogen), not a sentence related to the above.

You sure it is just atoms?
A+B=Hydrogen does not mean anything. What are you adding to what to make hydrogen? Without defining terms, it is a jumble of letters.

[guest39538]

This is not how maths works - it is a common language

Hmm, sorry but maths works the way we make it fit, that is how all maths works.  Are you saying that I and you are not presently divided by space ?  Think about that ...

That is obviously nonsense. You seem to not understand what division is in mathematics.

Oh please, if you have 2 apples and you divide them by two people, they get one each.  If you a volume of infinite space there is no 1 value so we cant say A+B/1 because there is no one , so we have to say A+B/K   because there is also no time until A becomes a binary with B, then time beings and then we can say (A+B) + A/t + B/t = 2 , but we could also say (A+B) + A/t + B/t = ^∞ because the process is without limits.

[The Spoon]

This is not how maths works - it is a common language

Hmm, sorry but maths works the way we make it fit, that is how all maths works.  Are you saying that I and you are not presently divided by space ?  Think about that ...

That is obviously nonsense. You seem to not understand what division is in mathematics.

Oh please, if you have 2 apples and you divide them by two people, they get one each.  If you a volume of infinite space there is no 1 value so we cant say A+B/1 because there is no one , so we have to say A+B/K   because there is also no time until A becomes a binary with B, then time beings and then we can say (A+B) + A/t + B/t = 2 , but we could also say (A+B) + A/t + B/t = ^∞ because the process is without limits.

So it cannot be mathematically represented then? Why do you persist in trying to do so by making up equations and redifining operators? Pigeon chess.
Enough of this - work to do and money to earn.

[guest39538]

So it cannot be mathematically represented then?

It is mathematically represented, I suppose a Maxwell type may be able to improve on it . Let me put in a value see if it helps you

= 0

= 0

Dispersed to 0 values.

Then lets try

= 1

Then finally

  + + = 2

added- Indeed that reads 1+0+0=2

Makes on interesting angled  pattern of numbers

1+0+0=2
1+0+0+0+0=3
1+0+0+0+0+0+0=4
1+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0=5
1+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0=6

[Bored chemist]

You have not presented any scientific counter argument what so ever, a lack of defense is the proof of proof.

Wrong on two counts.
Firstly, as I already pointed out, I can't put forward a counter argument- because none of what you say makes sense.
Secondly, as TheSpoon pointed out, "Because people have learned by past experience it is just pigeon chess."

How absurd, you can't copyright a physical fact,

You have yet to cite a physical fact.
But you do seem to have quoted Star Trek.

[The Spoon]

Indeed that reads 1+0+0=2

Makes on interesting angled  pattern of numbers

1+0+0=2
1+0+0+0+0=3
1+0+0+0+0+0+0=4
1+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0=5
1+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0=6

Which proves that you are a mathematically illiterate fool.

[Bored chemist]

1+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0=6

OK, so according to that ,if I give you a dollar, and then I give you zero dollars on 10 occasions, you will have six dollars.

In which case, you can give me 3 dollars and still be up on the deal.

Can we play this game in real life please?

[guest39538]

Which proves that you are a mathematically illiterate fool.

I don't mean to sound rude, but obviously you do not understand if you think the maths is meaningless and illiterate.  The maths works with my conceptual envision I have explained with theory .  The NFEU model does not ignore present Physics, to the contrary the model is based on some of the present physics such as Coulombs law, space-time and Dirac. I think you are possibly not considering Alpha or Beta point energy particle manifestations , popping into and out of existence , the dissipate resulting in dispersion to 0 value.

[The Spoon]

Which proves that you are a mathematically illiterate fool.

I don't mean to sound rude, but obviously you do not understand if you think the maths is meaningless and illiterate.  The maths works with my conceptual envision I have explained with theory .  The NFUE model does not ignore present Physics, to the contrary the model is based on some of the present physics such as Coulombs law, space-time and Dirac. I think you are possibly not considering Alpha or Beta point energy particle manifestations , popping into and out of existence , the dissipate resulting in dispersion to 0 value.

Adding 0 to 1 and getting 2 is mathematically illiterate. You cannot add nothing to something and get an increase. Likewise division does not mean in the context of maths something is separated from something. That is putting something into a different set.

[Bored chemist]

you do not understand if you think the maths is meaningless and illiterate. 

I have shown you exactly why your "maths" is plainly wrong.
Adding nothing to something doesn't make it bigger.

[guest39538]

Which proves that you are a mathematically illiterate fool.

I don't mean to sound rude, but obviously you do not understand if you think the maths is meaningless and illiterate.  The maths works with my conceptual envision I have explained with theory .  The NFUE model does not ignore present Physics, to the contrary the model is based on some of the present physics such as Coulombs law, space-time and Dirac. I think you are possibly not considering Alpha or Beta point energy particle manifestations , popping into and out of existence , the dissipate resulting in dispersion to 0 value.

Adding 0 to 1 and getting 2 is mathematically illiterate. You cannot add nothing to something and get an increase. Likewise division does not mean in the context of maths something is separated from something. That is putting something into a different set.

I think you mean to say that I am not using conventional maths that you are accustomed too.  That does not mean my maths is incorrect, it simply means it is new and you have not learnt to understand it yet.

[guest39538]

you do not understand if you think the maths is meaningless and illiterate. 

I have shown you exactly why your "maths" is plainly wrong.
Adding nothing to something doesn't make it bigger.

In the NFEU model it is demonstrated , why are you using the term nothing ?  0 is not nothing ...0 is fractionally 0 magnitude energy.
The binary manifested energy C particle is the convergence point of Alpha and Beat waves, an Alpha wave and Beta wave density reformer .

[Bored chemist]

If you are inventing "new" maths then
(1) you need to say so.
(2) you need to explain what it is and how it is all consistent and
(3) you should stop using the symbols of ordinary maths to avoid confusion.

Step 2 will probably take a decade or two. I suggest you start by defining what you use as numbers and the rules for addition.
Until you do that none of your "stuff" will make any sense.
And, since you have not done it yet, none of your stuff can make sense.
You have demonstrated why I have been correct all along.

Come back with a clear explanation of the maths you are using.

[guest39538]

(1) you need to say so.
(2) you need to explain what it is and how it is all consistent and

The NFEU model has already explained , however the NFUE model can explain the math in a different form :

+ + =


E₁ =

+

E₂ =

=m^₁

m^₁  + m_1/2 + m_1/2 = m^2

Additionally =

The NFEU model also explains

* * = =m^n



To be continued...

[The Spoon]

Which proves that you are a mathematically illiterate fool.

I don't mean to sound rude, but obviously you do not understand if you think the maths is meaningless and illiterate.  The maths works with my conceptual envision I have explained with theory .  The NFEU model does not ignore present Physics, to the contrary the model is based on some of the present physics such as Coulombs law, space-time and Dirac. I think you are possibly not considering Alpha or Beta point energy particle manifestations , popping into and out of existence , the dissipate resulting in dispersion to 0 value.

This is like a child saying 'you can't speak to my imaginary friend because they use a language that only I can understand'.