Bolt, nut, spring and rotation to destroy the energy

opportunity · « **Reply #1 on:** 22/09/2018 11:24:16 »

Are you putting energy in to turn the disc?

opportunity · « **Reply #2 on:** 22/09/2018 12:39:27 »

Quote from: LB7 on 22/09/2018 12:19:56

Yes, I give an energy to rotate the disk and I counted all I lost and all I win during the time the spring is rolling up on the helix. I lost the work from 2 torques on the disk and I win the length of the spring. But maybe I made a mistake on my calculations.

What did you count putting in.

opportunity · « **Reply #3 on:** 22/09/2018 13:29:42 »

You're giving a mind game.

You're suggesting through various methods that energy can be created through convoluted mechnaisms without using "real" science.

Should a scientific purist think that is trolling or just sheer ignorance?

opportunity · « **Reply #4 on:** 22/09/2018 13:45:26 »

"Where it is not basic law of physics"?

Well.....where is a language a language and how well that is spoken?

Ideally language should capture what it is trying to define, a reality it exists within.

what's the go there with you, language, and alllllll the acknowledgement of scientific theory people expect?

opportunity · « **Reply #5 on:** 22/09/2018 14:01:21 »

Quote from: LB7 on 22/09/2018 13:52:57

I don't understand. Have you understood the device ? If yes, and like you know physics tell me where is my mistake if you find it.

Your mistake is using the idea of diagrams with springs and flywheels to generate energy.

No research, right?

Your mistake is not acknowledging "prior art", previous ideas on the subject.

Aaaa…..aaaanother mistake is that you're not even setting a platform to deliver your brilliance in a way to demonstrate the Earth is a better place because of your energy-generating device.

opportunity · « **Reply #6 on:** 22/09/2018 18:03:56 »

I'm wondering if your post is setting a new standard of logic.

What do you think?

What do the moderators think?

opportunity · « **Reply #7 on:** 22/09/2018 18:14:16 »

I think I get you....so funny.

Good luck

syhprum · « **Reply #8 on:** 22/09/2018 19:59:56 »

Why does the design of perpetual motion machines get such a generous allocation of time on this forum ?

opportunity · « **Reply #9 on:** 24/09/2018 12:20:39 »

The thing about "free energy" machines is that humans are not "free energy" devices. Humans need to put energy in to "themselves" to do work. For a human to "create" something beyond its own repertoire of conscious operation is almost super-silly. Imagine for a second humans created a free-energy device.....would there be a temptation to implement it into the human biology? No longer human?

Dirac proposed the idea of negative energy, the Dirac sea, the "emergence" of energy, naturally, to explain the relativity of bodies under the influence of gravity. Yet that wasn't proposing a free-energy device, it was a way to explain the relativistic conditions of bodies undergoing gravitational effects.

opportunity · « **Reply #10 on:** 24/09/2018 15:18:44 »

You should go to Area 51

Say you want to be test pilot....that sort of thing...

opportunity · « **Reply #11 on:** 03/10/2018 16:04:49 »

Ha ha.

Moderators must be on holiday.

I was given a 30 day cooler for multiple posting.

Sounds like the muppet show to me.

LB7, forum hierarchy blessed, whatever, whats your pitch, what do you want to promote in one sentence?

opportunity · « **Reply #12 on:** 03/10/2018 17:02:24 »

Understood.

disk, helix, spring, and whatever else sounds like a fairground ride.

no offence.

I hope it makes you money

And this is a lesson to everyone in the forum...there's nothing wrong with making some money through such devices.

opportunity · « **Reply #13 on:** 19/10/2018 12:47:19 »

Is this from contemporary science or maybe a type of philosophy of science?

syhprum · « **Reply #14 on:** 16/12/2018 10:39:54 »

Yet another version of the flopping hammer contraption with lots of added complexity and blind you with science jargon.

RD · « **Reply #15 on:** 13/01/2019 20:10:56 »

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Pathological_science

syhprum · « **Reply #16 on:** 17/01/2019 10:03:58 »

This strange lecture on how to build a perpetual motion machine really hangs around is there no way to kill it off

Bored chemist · « **Reply #17 on:** 09/02/2019 21:17:42 »

Have you mistaken this for a blog site?

Bored chemist · « **Reply #18 on:** 10/02/2019 10:34:55 »

Quote from: LB7 on 09/02/2019 21:57:27

No, I post my ideas and try to prove with calculations it is possible to create/destroy the energy.

And still, we know you can't.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem
That's why you are not getting many replies.
You are more or less soapboxing.

syhprum · « **Reply #19 on:** 10/02/2019 11:13:49 »

After you have built your demonstration model get on to NASA and see if they can build a space qualified version to replace RTG,s which are becoming difficult to build do to a shortage of Uranium

Bolt, nut, spring and rotation to destroy the energy

LB7 (OP)