The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Does the current scientific "rule of law" allow for revolutionary new ideas?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Does the current scientific "rule of law" allow for revolutionary new ideas?

  • 0 Replies
  • 1696 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline opportunity (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1553
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 48 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • Do not change the URL below
Does the current scientific "rule of law" allow for revolutionary new ideas?
« on: 06/10/2018 13:49:22 »
Science has developed through millennia of theories and results to back those theories.

The ultimate flaw though here is using a-priori of time and space from millennia ago.

Is it possible that the scientific a-priori for the ideas of time and space can be "better refined" with the advent of this age of tremendous data?

For instance, space can be very well accepted as 3 dimensions. That's given. Yet what about the idea of "time" as a single dimension? Why can't "time" be a mathematical algorithm?

I've been working a new theory for time as an algorithm, and I've been able to establish some very interesting results, more efficient than using time as a simple "arrow", 1-dimensional.

This is my work so far:

<<<COMMERCIAL LINK REMOVED>>>

Does anyone else in the forum think its possible science is cutting itself short using the current "rule of law" a-priori for the concept of space and time, a "rule of law" orated in BC times, namely 3-d space and 1 dimensional time?
« Last Edit: 07/10/2018 07:10:39 by Colin2B »
Logged
What is physics without new ideas shed by the positive light of interest of others with new possible solutions to age old problems?
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.281 seconds with 24 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.