The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Life Sciences
Physiology & Medicine
Are daily retinal scans bad for our health?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Are daily retinal scans bad for our health?
1 Replies
2126 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pseudoscience-is-malarkey
(OP)
Hero Member
940
Activity:
1.5%
Thanked: 32 times
Are daily retinal scans bad for our health?
«
on:
27/10/2018 09:45:11 »
Are daily (or almost daily) retinal scans bad for our eye health or health in general? If you at the Naked Scientists had to use retinal scans (for security) to enter your office would any of you not be ok with it?
Logged
evan_au
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
11035
Activity:
9%
Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Are daily retinal scans bad for our health?
«
Reply #1 on:
27/10/2018 10:24:53 »
There are international standards for eye-safety of lasers and light sources in general.
They seem to be based on scientific evidence about the maximum brightness that will cause damage to the retina.
I am sure that commercial retina scanners would be tested against these standards.
I have had occasional retina scans from an optometrist using a visible red laser- while the brightness is uncomfortable during the scan (it made me want to blink), my eyes seemed to recover within a few seconds.
Apparently, commercial scanners for security applications use infra-red light, which would not cause the same discomfort as visible light.
See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retinal_scan
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...