0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You seem to not want to discuss Muslims mutilating young girls and women. PS. I do presume that you know that Muslims are hold up in concentration camps in china. You do know that right, so is that cool with you too, you think that you want to visit.
Quote from: Europa on 23/07/2021 00:24:42You seem to not want to discuss Muslims mutilating young girls and women. PS. I do presume that you know that Muslims are hold up in concentration camps in china. You do know that right, so is that cool with you too, you think that you want to visit.Will you try to use the same method to your case?
Is this what you want?
The chinese do not see throwing live dogs into the fire as being torture, this is the problem
Are you happy with the treatment of Muslims in china?https://muslimmatters.org/2016/11/30/15-things-you-need-to-know-about-chinas-torture-of-uyghur-muslims/
Teenagers are arrested due to posts on social mediaYoung Uyghurs are arrested for posting comments on social media or watching Islamic videos online. Once a 15 yr old was arrested in the same case and sentenced for 10 years!.Other than this not many people are given internet connection and Police can arrest anyone for watching anything online! Uyghur homes are also raided for materials deemed “extreme” or “subversive.
Apply my tests. Would you like it if I threw you into a fire? Would you do it to your children? If the answer to either is no, it is immoral.
Morality and necessity may appear on opposite sides of the decision equation. Killing people in wartime, or even killing a single assailant, is a necessity,
whereas killing someone who does not pose a threat and does not want to be killed is clearly immoral.
Killing sentient beings for food, by any means, could be considered immoral and it certainly isn't essential for human survival outside of the arctic regions, so we assign the concept of "humane" to some methods of killing.
Where possible, render your victim unconscious or kill quickly with the minimum of pain and suffering. Problem with crustaceans is the same as killing an enemy in a tank - there is no polite way to do it.The Scottish Society of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals successfully prosecuted a woman who tortured a prawn in a factory by "making it dance on a hotplate" for entertainment, instead of dunking it in boiling water as prescribed.
Quote from: alancalverd on 24/07/2021 11:08:52Killing sentient beings for food, by any means, could be considered immoral and it certainly isn't essential for human survival outside of the arctic regions, so we assign the concept of "humane" to some methods of killing. Do you classify plants as sentient beings? What about mushrooms? Or algae? jelly fish? What's the boundaries?
Your brain suffers irreversible damage after about 3 minutes without oxygen. The nice thing about nitrogen hypoxia is that breathing nitrogen at around normal atmospheric pressure allows you to clear the carbon dioxide from your lungs as normal. CO2 is what triggers the autonomic breathing reflex and ultimately, panic.
There is no clear distinction, which is why your search for a universal morality is fruitless. Life is competitive.
That's non-sequitur. There's no clear boundary between red and orange. It doesn't mean that the concept of colors is useless.
I came to the same conclusion using either deductive or inductive reasoning.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 25/07/2021 07:38:58That's non-sequitur. There's no clear boundary between red and orange. It doesn't mean that the concept of colors is useless.but the idea of a universal color is!
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 25/07/2021 07:38:58 I came to the same conclusion using either deductive or inductive reasoning.Both of which depend on the validity of your initial assumption. Fine for a philosophy or theology forum, but we boring scientists start with an observation, not a proposition.
Have you searched for the universal color standard? What do you find?