The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. Is this purported cancer-test feasible ?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is this purported cancer-test feasible ?

  • 7 Replies
  • 1308 Views
  • 1 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RD (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 151 times
    • View Profile
Is this purported cancer-test feasible ?
« on: 18/02/2019 17:40:45 »
Allegedly this cancer test is capable of detecting a "one single circulating tumour cell" in vivo.

I'm skeptical, here's one of the reasons why ...
a video of a normal mouse (no cancer) being given an injection of indocyanine green (ICG) whilst illuminated by Infra Red. Mickey lights-up like a Christmas-tree because ICG binds to components of normal blood.
« Last Edit: 18/02/2019 17:53:29 by RD »
Logged
 



Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 22008
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 511 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is this purported cancer-test feasible ?
« Reply #1 on: 18/02/2019 19:29:34 »
If this stuff was truly specific + only stuck to tumour cells then we could chemically  glue a toxic molecule to it and get it to poison those cells.
No detection needed- just kill the bastards.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline RD (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 151 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is this purported cancer-test feasible ?
« Reply #2 on: 18/02/2019 20:37:05 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 18/02/2019 19:29:34
If this stuff was truly specific + only stuck to tumour cells then we could chemically  glue a toxic molecule to it and get it to poison those cells.
No detection needed- just kill the bastards.

In the video it is claimed to be a twofer: both cancer detection & treatment.

Spectroscopy is repeatedly mentioned in the video ,
but ICG will fluoresce at a known frequency, when illuminated with a specific frequency,
so no need analyse a spectrum ...


* 715bea9f1d7ec581a903a88a6f649213f11c.png (133.78 kB . 872x714 - viewed 1543 times)

In that article, "Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Imaging Technique in Cardiovascular Surgery",
they say "penetration of fluorescence is less than 2 to 3 mm" with their superior-looking equipment. 
So if the (~2mm ø) "spectroscopy" probe attached to the skin was equally sensitive,
most of the "total blood-volume" is not going to be screened in "17 minutes".
« Last Edit: 18/02/2019 21:32:55 by RD »
Logged
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 22008
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 511 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is this purported cancer-test feasible ?
« Reply #3 on: 18/02/2019 21:56:49 »
Spectroscopy might be needed- not so that you can see the ICG- but to screen out other fluorescence from other stuff present in the body.

It's also possible to do clever tricks like gating (so you only look for fluorescence that occurs at a specified time after the light is absorbed).
That can give you information about the environment of the fluorescent material.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28397959

But I still think it's iffy.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline RD (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 151 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is this purported cancer-test feasible ?
« Reply #4 on: 19/02/2019 00:20:30 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 18/02/2019 21:56:49
... fluorescence that occurs at a specified time after the light is absorbed ...

I can see delayed-fluorescence, or phosphorescence, being included to explain why the IR optical-fiber is in the forearm but the electronic-sensor probe* is on the bicep.

Even running with the idea that CTC luminescence is delayed or persists until it reached the bicep,
if the probe* on the bicep can only see ~8mm3 then the vast majority of any CTCs illuminated by IR in the forearm will not pass under the probe*, and will go undetected.

Even one did go under the probe*, it's only 10-20µm ø, occupying >1/50,000 of the sensor's field of view.
Light emitted by it would be swamped by light from any background levels of ICG, or from autofluorescence.
Signal lost in noise.

This alleged-test is a complete non-starter IMO. 

[ * In this scenario the ICG fluorophore chemical is the called a probe.
That the good-doctor repeatedly calls the electronic-sensor a probe shows how well he understands the subject ].

* looks like a $10 temperture-sensor.jpg (67.77 kB, 1265x413 - viewed 118 times.)
« Last Edit: 19/02/2019 09:41:18 by RD »
Logged
 



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 9190
  • Activity:
    73.5%
  • Thanked: 917 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is this purported cancer-test feasible ?
« Reply #5 on: 19/02/2019 08:55:28 »
If they had identified a particular wavelength to which the dye was sensitive when coupled to a cancer cell, and caused it to fluoresce at a specific other wavelength, that would make it a lot more selective.

But there are many types of cancer, which display a different mix of surface proteins, so a very selective test is unlikely to detect most of them (let alone all of them).

It seems that what we have is:
- A very non-selective test
- Which is guaranteed to find a positive response in every individual
- And then pushes everyone into Phase 2, using the same equipment to treat the cancer that they have just discovered
- And then pushes them into Phase 3, which is regular follow-up treatments, just in case it comes back...

Of course, treatment of the blood will not find nor eliminate any primary cancer.
 
Logged
 

Offline RD (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 151 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is this purported cancer-test feasible ?
« Reply #6 on: 19/02/2019 09:31:21 »
Quote from: evan_au on 19/02/2019 08:55:28
It seems that what we have is:
- A very non-selective test
- Which is guaranteed to find a positive response in every individual ...

Even the cancer patient's "companion", who will be told they too have cancer and will require treatment,
( there are naive people on the premises who are not being bilked, let's scam them too ).

* YouTube t6RgzKfiqBE t=5m28s.jpg (118.9 kB, 800x604 - viewed 122 times.)
« Last Edit: 19/02/2019 10:45:27 by RD »
Logged
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 22008
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 511 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is this purported cancer-test feasible ?
« Reply #7 on: 19/02/2019 18:40:16 »
I'd be a lot happier if he could pronounce phosphorescence.
There may be something in this idea, but I'm very dubious.
However, I'd love to be proven wrong.

Incidentally, delayed fluorescence typically means microseconds, rather than nanoseconds.
It's still far too fast for the cells to travel any meaningful distance.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: circulating tumour cells 
 

Similar topics (5)

Where does the saying "acid test" come from?

Started by MissMontanaBoard That CAN'T be true!

Replies: 11
Views: 15402
Last post 04/04/2004 22:42:21
by MayoFlyFarmer
How to test rocks to see if gold looking stuff is really gold?

Started by huntin4goldBoard Geology, Palaeontology & Archaeology

Replies: 49
Views: 122563
Last post 03/03/2010 09:15:54
by yor_on
Can cancer stem cells be reverted or reprogrammed to become healthy stem cells?

Started by Honda2000Board Cells, Microbes & Viruses

Replies: 8
Views: 19727
Last post 01/02/2008 16:18:51
by Honda2000
Why is blood a different RED when comparing a nosebleed to blood test vial?

Started by beemBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 13
Views: 19106
Last post 03/02/2009 20:22:35
by beem
DO YOU REMEMBER BABY jESSICA, THE 1RST TEST TUBE BABY?

Started by Karen W.Board Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 10
Views: 6714
Last post 23/08/2019 15:03:41
by Karen W.
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.185 seconds with 51 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.