The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Black hole size locking
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Black hole size locking

  • 4 Replies
  • 2035 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lance Canham (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 49
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Black hole size locking
« on: 22/04/2019 16:28:29 »
black hole size locking - How it integrates and stables out so Classical physics can then tackle the issue  of the then (classical matter). To say the black hole is the god particle that can grow I need to show something that can lock it for a long time.

I believe it simply comes down to the expansion of the universe. As it pulls the knots apart the amount of mass is now locked into that system till your next big bang reaches our stage of development at which point the classical matter as we know it can pool and break down in to its base particle and then merge with the new larger one on their marry way to ultimately get locked for another long time and then Again and again.

Only so much matter will pool at a knot and when the knot is pulled far enough from the rest the weaker forces will eventual show themselves. We know those knots will be pulled apart to where there gravity well can only grab so much. This locks the blacks possible size for a long time before it can happen again over large areas.

Further reading

Missing Dark Matter
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76826.0

What's inside a black hole
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76800.0

Is dark matter the new ether
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76793.0

Hypothesis of everything
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76711.0

why is the expansion rate changing
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76702.0

why is there no dark matter in a couple of galaxies
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76614.0
Logged
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Black hole size locking
« Reply #1 on: 22/04/2019 16:39:06 »
Quote from: Lance Canham on 22/04/2019 16:28:29
black hole size locking - How it integrates and stables out so Classical physics can then tackle the issue  of the then (classical matter). To say the black hole is the god particle that can grow I need to show something that can lock it for a long time.

I believe it simply comes down to the expansion of the universe. As it pulls the knots apart the amount of mass is now locked into that system till your next big bang reaches our stage of development at which point the classical matter as we know it can pool and break down in to its base particle and then merge with the new larger one on their marry way to ultimately get locked for another long time and then Again and again.

Only so much matter will pool at a knot and when the knot is pulled far enough from the rest the weaker forces will eventual show themselves. We know those knots will be pulled apart to where there gravity well can only grab so much. This locks the blacks possible size for a long time before it can happen again over large areas.

Further reading

Missing Dark Matter
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76826.0

What's inside a black hole
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76800.0

Is dark matter the new ether
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76793.0

Hypothesis of everything
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76711.0

why is the expansion rate changing
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76702.0

why is there no dark matter in a couple of galaxies
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76614.0

A BH locks itself because its a singularity whole  .
Logged
 

Offline Lance Canham (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 49
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Black hole size locking
« Reply #2 on: 22/04/2019 18:08:06 »
Quote from: Thebox on 22/04/2019 16:39:06
A BH locks itself because its a singularity whole  .

Im not looking at looking in the say aspect you are -we are thinking 2 completely aspects related to it though. When I start thinking about what you say That's when I start to think of the law that says I have to move from order to chaos. What I need to Address in my hypotheses is a reason my fundamental particle that gives mass can be locked in basic particle of matter that classical physics can then deal with.

So my particle that can ONLY grow and never shrink will have to be locked in a particle and not grow,  yet further more has to be released out of another as some quarks weigh in at more than lead.

The particle is locked by expansion. A quark is not one thing and it needs for all intensive purposes Dark matter (smaller black hole ultimately if im right) The quark may be more like the knot then you know especially if it truly never pools unless one day pulled into another supper huge Black hole. So if its made of many galaxies Or large black holes it can shed mass in an interaction - energy seen from above and stars gas galaxies and black holes when looking up from way smaller.

By now you understand my thinking in the bigger sense at this point from the other posts.

Mass has to be locked in cycles over periods of time in something that can be let to grow when gravity overtakes the forces. BLAAAAAAAAA

Just as it has to move from order I find the black hole HAS to grow. There is a way to temporarily Halt that. You Physics and a way to again break that that temporary stall - look up.

Its getting to the point that to solve the small you now need to look up not further down and to solve the large you need to look further down - you need to meet.
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Black hole size locking
« Reply #3 on: 22/04/2019 18:24:01 »
Quote from: Lance Canham on 22/04/2019 18:08:06


Im not looking at looking in the say aspect you are -we are thinking 2 completely aspects related to it though. When I start thinking about what you say That's when I start to think of the law that says I have to move from order to chaos. What I need to Address in my hypotheses is a reason my fundamental particle that gives mass can be locked in basic particle of matter that classical physics can then deal with.

So my particle that can ONLY grow and never shrink will have to be locked in a particle and not grow,  yet further more has to be released out of another as some quarks weigh in at more than lead.

The particle is locked by expansion. A quark is not one thing and it needs for all intensive purposes Dark matter (smaller black hole ultimately if im right) The quark may be more like the knot then you know especially if it truly never pools unless one day pulled into another supper huge Black hole. So if its made of many galaxies Or large black holes it can shed mass in an interaction - energy seen from above and stars gas galaxies and black holes when looking up from way smaller.

By now you understand my thinking in the bigger sense at this point from the other posts.

Mass has to be locked in cycles over periods of time in something that can be let to grow when gravity overtakes the forces. BLAAAAAAAAA

Just as it has to move from order I find the black hole HAS to grow. There is a way to temporarily Halt that. You Physics and a way to again break that that temporary stall - look up.

Its getting to the point that to solve the small you now need to look up not further down and to solve the large you need to look further down - you need to meet.


Particles are binaries as are fields and singularities    065ec1583083cc3c8f04eac463147b2b.gif 



Logged
 

Offline Lance Canham (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 49
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Black hole size locking
« Reply #4 on: 23/04/2019 04:57:58 »
It is commonly known that, if you accelerate an object, its mass will increase; however, to understand why this phenomenon occurs, we mustn’t think of the object’s mass increasing. Instead, we should think of its energy.

Trying to figure out how a quark inside protons could have more mass then lead. And how it fits my concept.

 so its been given a motional boost through an interaction. The base particle I'm describing are there in the quark in almost infinite  if not infinite numbers  giving the object its mass if it were not moving  but its mass as far as physics goes adds its motion or energy.

ATM the big issue is separating out matter and pulling it apart so that gravity between gets so weak the other forces are left to play and we defiantly see that happening.

 if a knot   becomes a true quark it would not necessary have to have the same amount of matter (mass outside spacetime + spacetime)  it simply has to move forward or have its parts (galaxies and gas) move faster.

Am I right in the assumption  I can make up the lack of matter by increasing the speed a little to make up slight variances a trillion years down the road.
.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.735 seconds with 35 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.