[The Spoon]

You said:

Consider buoyancy , the greater the area of something the slower it sinks

This points to you referring to standard buoyancy which is basic physics and shows you do not understand it.
It indicates that you are talking about things on a macro i.e. non-quantum level. You are therefore just bullshitting.

Which part of you don't understand quantum buoyancy didn't you understand ?

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

Is it a blue egg with some letters?

The earth and space

And how does that demonstrate anything about buoyancy - quantum or otherwise? Is G a magic letter?

[guest39538]

You said:

Consider buoyancy , the greater the area of something the slower it sinks

This points to you referring to standard buoyancy which is basic physics and shows you do not understand it.
It indicates that you are talking about things on a macro i.e. non-quantum level. You are therefore just bullshitting.

Which part of you don't understand quantum buoyancy didn't you understand ?

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

Is it a blue egg with some letters?

The earth and space

And how does that demonstrate anything about buoyancy - quantum or otherwise? Is G a magic letter?

Transition , you know how hot is attracted to cold and vice versus .

When air is heated because it has a low inertia and low mass , it moves with the transition .  The air is falling upwards when heated because of gravity .  When it cools again the lesser energy state is then attracted back to the earth , the earth can't move because it has more inertia and mass .  That's how gravity works , N is attracted to N but based on internal energy U . 

Believe me or not but that is what happens objectively .


Added - fire points up because of the gravity of the transition phase .

[guest39538]

Gravity is a dualism ….


dualism.jpg (15.07 kB . 392x315 - viewed 3091 times)

[guest39538]

I suppose I'd better add some proof , large ball small ball .  I don't just make things up with no reference in my mind ya know ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_experiment


easy.jpg (8.69 kB . 463x277 - viewed 3244 times)

[Bored chemist]

2)I know physics

No you do not.
If you did you wouldn't post  dross that fails dimensional analysis.

[Bored chemist]

I suppose I'd better add some proof , large ball small ball .  I don't just make things up with no reference in my mind ya know

You are talking balls.

[guest39538]

2)I know physics

No you do not.
If you did you wouldn't post  dross that fails dimensional analysis.

We all know you're one of the believer's of fantasy , time slows down, space is expanding , fake CERN results, fake BH pics , you're hardly in a position to judge physics , you don't know anything .

[Kryptid]

3) Every idea I've ever tried tends to work

So you've actually performed experiments that support your ideas?

[guest39538]

3) Every idea I've ever tried tends to work

So you've actually performed experiments that support your ideas?

Nope but any ideas I ever had in the past , put into practice, they've always worked for me .  I've done some experimentation , one involving a laser that gave me an atomizer idea , one with magnets that gave me a force field idea , one with a television that gave me a BH idea , one with buoyancy and a kinder egg plastics ,  one using the spectrum to make invisible , I don't attempt an idea unless I'm confident it will work .

If I have an idea it works …

[Bored chemist]

you don't know anything

I know that you can't meaningfully say whether a metre is bigger of smaller than a gallon, so I'm one up on you.

[guest39538]

you don't know anything

I know that you can't meaningfully say whether a metre is bigger of smaller than a gallon, so I'm one up on you.

A metre is a length , a gallon is a measure of often liquid contained in a specific volume . Specifically 4.54 litres , in painting and decorating we say a gallon tin for a 5ltr tin of paint

[Bored chemist]

you don't know anything

I know that you can't meaningfully say whether a metre is bigger of smaller than a gallon, so I'm one up on you.

A metre is a length , a gallon is a measure of often liquid contained in a specific volume . Specifically 4.54 litres , in painting and decorating we say a gallon tin for a 5ltr tin of paint

Yes.
I know.
So, which one is bigger?

[guest39538]

you don't know anything

I know that you can't meaningfully say whether a metre is bigger of smaller than a gallon, so I'm one up on you.

A metre is a length , a gallon is a measure of often liquid contained in a specific volume . Specifically 4.54 litres , in painting and decorating we say a gallon tin for a 5ltr tin of paint

Yes.
I know.
So, which one is bigger?

Your question makes no sense , is a meter longer than a cubic gallon volume ?  Of course , is a gallon bigger than a m³ , nope .  1 gal = 0.0037854117840007 m³

[evan_au]

If I have an idea it works …Modulation

So which invention was this one?
Randomly switching colors, then reducing the saturation.

Is this the television test pattern that produces black holes?

[guest39538]

Randomly switching colors, then reducing the saturation.

I didn't reduce the saturation , I just kept speeding it up and it disappeared , try it , it's easy enough to do the animation and speed it up .
Would you like me to do the same thing using a circle and show the entire process ?

[The Spoon]

3) Every idea I've ever tried tends to work

So you've actually performed experiments that support your ideas?

Nope but any ideas I ever had in the past , put into practice, they've always worked for me .  I've done some experimentation , one involving a laser that gave me an atomizer idea , one with magnets that gave me a force field idea , one with a television that gave me a BH idea , one with buoyancy and a kinder egg plastics ,  one using the spectrum to make invisible , I don't attempt an idea unless I'm confident it will work .

If I have an idea it works …

You have failed to demonstrate any of this. You are a fantasist.

[guest39538]

You have failed to demonstrate any of this. You are a fantasist.

Does or does not the image vanish ? 

What works , works .

[Bored chemist]

Your question makes no sense

Good.
I'm glad you recognise that.
Now, imagine someone asks if a pond is more or less than a kilogram.
It's easy enough to find out- you use a set of scales.

There's an important mathematical process going on here.
To find out if A is bigger than B you subtract B from A.
If the answer is positive then A is bigger. If the answer is negative then B is bigger.

So, you can compare a metre and  a yard by putting them next to each other on the floor with the ends against the wall.
The distance between the other ends  (about 3 inches) is the difference.
It's one metre minus one yard.


But, as you say, you can't do that with a gallon and a metre.
You can't calculate the difference between them.
You can't do it with a metre and a cubic metre either (because the m^3 might be short + fat or long + thin.)

It turns out that you can not subtract something from something else unless it is the same sort of thing.
And unsurprisingly you also can't add things that are different in that way .
The "sort of thing" here is the dimension.

You can add acres to square km- you just have to convert them to the same units first.
But you can't add acres to pounds.

Do you accept this  so far?

[The Spoon]

You have failed to demonstrate any of this. You are a fantasist.

Does or does not the image vanish ? 

What works , works .

It vanishes but that hardly backs up any of your ridiculous ideas. What about all the other stuff you claimed? Or are you just lying again?

[guest39538]

Do you accept this  so far?

Of course , You can't fit a square peg through a smaller round hole because they are different .  OK, please continue , I've found your change of character interesting .