The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 23   Go Down

why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?

  • 454 Replies
  • 134063 Views
  • 6 Tags

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21136
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #280 on: 06/06/2023 16:04:31 »
Wave propagation in a string depends on whether you waggle one end of a long, soft, heavy rope, so you propagate sine waves along its length, or pluck the middle of a short, stiff, light wire whose ends are fixed, so you can only produce standing waves with nodes at the ends.

Apparently AI doesn't  know what a guitar is, or the difference between pluck and shake. Not that it matters at all, because anyone who wants to play a guitar knows exactly what they mean, and anyone who understands physics can spot bullshit. As usual, the contribution of AI is negative.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11779
  • Activity:
    86%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #281 on: 07/06/2023 14:51:07 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 06/06/2023 16:04:31
Wave propagation in a string depends on whether you waggle one end of a long, soft, heavy rope, so you propagate sine waves along its length, or pluck the middle of a short, stiff, light wire whose ends are fixed, so you can only produce standing waves with nodes at the ends.
If the string is long enough, the wave doesn't have to be a standing wave.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21136
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #282 on: 08/06/2023 17:36:39 »
It does on a guitar, because the ends are fixed. You might somehow induce a travelling or compression wave with a magnetic excitation of a steel string but the resulting frequency (MHz) will be far too high to contribute to the "wide rich sound...."
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11779
  • Activity:
    86%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #283 on: 09/06/2023 08:34:37 »

Quote
(a) One end of a string is fixed so that it cannot move. A wave propagating on the string, encountering this fixed boundary condition, is reflected 180o(π rad) out of phase with respect to the incident wave.

(b) One end of a string is tied to a solid ring of negligible mass on a frictionless lab pole, where the ring is free to move. A wave propagating on the string, encountering this free boundary condition, is reflected in phase 0o(0 rad)  with respect to the wave.
I mentioned these merely to show a counter example of Bard's claim that all waves experience diffraction.
« Last Edit: 09/06/2023 08:39:32 by hamdani yusuf »
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21136
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #284 on: 09/06/2023 08:48:23 »
What has reflection to do with diffraction?
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #285 on: 09/06/2023 08:48:49 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 08/06/2023 17:36:39
It does on a guitar, because the ends are fixed. You might somehow induce a travelling or compression wave with a magnetic excitation of a steel string but the resulting frequency (MHz) will be far too high to contribute to the "wide rich sound...."
I'd like to see the maths on that. Take the average guitar string as having a length of 1 metre and the speed of sound in steel to be 5km/sec
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #286 on: 09/06/2023 08:50:01 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 09/06/2023 08:34:37
I mentioned these merely to show a counter example of Bard's claim that all waves experience diffraction.
The pictures do not show waves.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11779
  • Activity:
    86%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #287 on: 09/06/2023 10:14:02 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 09/06/2023 08:48:23
What has reflection to do with diffraction?
Quote from: alancalverd on 08/06/2023 17:36:39
It does on a guitar, because the ends are fixed.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11779
  • Activity:
    86%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #288 on: 09/06/2023 10:16:22 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 09/06/2023 08:50:01
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 09/06/2023 08:34:37
I mentioned these merely to show a counter example of Bard's claim that all waves experience diffraction.
The pictures do not show waves.
What do you think they show?
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #289 on: 09/06/2023 12:28:29 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 09/06/2023 10:16:22
Quote from: Bored chemist on 09/06/2023 08:50:01
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 09/06/2023 08:34:37
I mentioned these merely to show a counter example of Bard's claim that all waves experience diffraction.
The pictures do not show waves.
What do you think they show?
Pulses.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21136
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #290 on: 09/06/2023 14:11:28 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 09/06/2023 08:48:49
Quote from: alancalverd on 08/06/2023 17:36:39
It does on a guitar, because the ends are fixed. You might somehow induce a travelling or compression wave with a magnetic excitation of a steel string but the resulting frequency (MHz) will be far too high to contribute to the "wide rich sound...."
I'd like to see the maths on that. Take the average guitar string as having a length of 1 metre and the speed of sound in steel to be 5km/sec
So the lowest frequency that might propagate as a reflected longitudinal wave is 15 times the fundamental of the highest-pitched open string - that's not "rich" but "squeaky", and the harmonics are mostly beyond human auditory range.

Longitudinal standing compression waves are generated in wind instruments, not stringed ones.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11779
  • Activity:
    86%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #291 on: 09/06/2023 15:05:24 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 09/06/2023 14:11:28
Longitudinal standing compression waves are generated in wind instruments, not stringed ones.
It can also be generated in a slinky.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11779
  • Activity:
    86%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #292 on: 09/06/2023 15:06:37 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 09/06/2023 12:28:29
Pulses.
How many oscillations are needed to produce a wave?
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21136
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #293 on: 09/06/2023 22:50:43 »
One. The difference is that an oscillation has both positive and negative excursions about the equilibrium, whereas a pulse is a unidirectional displacement followed by a return to equilibrium.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11779
  • Activity:
    86%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #294 on: 10/06/2023 15:42:01 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 09/06/2023 22:50:43
One. The difference is that an oscillation has both positive and negative excursions about the equilibrium, whereas a pulse is a unidirectional displacement followed by a return to equilibrium.
If there are more than 1 oscillations, would it make any difference?
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21136
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #295 on: 10/06/2023 16:06:25 »
No.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11779
  • Activity:
    86%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #296 on: 10/06/2023 23:34:26 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 10/06/2023 16:06:25
No.

It means that a string or a slinky can produce traveling wave which doesn't diffract.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21136
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #297 on: 11/06/2023 18:01:26 »
It can't diffract because it is constrained to travel along the length of the string. If you "bend" the string around a rigid fixture, the wave may reflect from the fixture but won't go around it, but if you bend the string with a flexible post, the attenuated wave will travel beyond the post.

So what?   
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11779
  • Activity:
    86%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #298 on: 12/06/2023 12:25:55 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 11/06/2023 18:01:26
if you bend the string with a flexible post, the attenuated wave will travel beyond the post.
Will you call it diffraction?
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21136
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #299 on: 12/06/2023 14:34:32 »
To the same extent that any other wave is diffracted by an obstacle.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 23   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: interference  / diffraction  / #physics  / #diffraction  / #optics  / #interference 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.337 seconds with 67 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.