The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. New Theory: How electromagnetic radiation change from inverse cubic to inverse square
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

New Theory: How electromagnetic radiation change from inverse cubic to inverse square

  • 6 Replies
  • 4486 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hayseed (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 350
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 11 times
  • Naked Science Forum Crackpot
New Theory: How electromagnetic radiation change from inverse cubic to inverse square
« on: 28/10/2019 15:40:36 »
Because, there is a BIG difference between a field, and a wave.  In a field, the electrical component, is linear, but in rotation.  All E fields are in rotation.  All.  The internal capacitor field is in rotation.  When the field is converted into a wave, the electric field remains linear.  E waves do NOT rotate.

In a field, the magnetic component is angular. When this field is converted into a wave, it is converted from an angular motion........into a linear motion.  This is different than the E conversion.  With the E conversion, only the direction of the E field is changed......But the M component, is cut....the poles are divided.......and only ONE M pole is sent with the E component....to make a wave.

Field induction always has 2 M poles.  Wave induction always has 1 M pole induction.
Logged
The proper hardware will eliminate all theory.
 



Offline hamdani yusuf

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11803
  • Activity:
    76%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: New Theory: How electromagnetic radiation change from inverse cubic to inverse square
« Reply #1 on: 29/10/2019 06:25:17 »
Quote from: Hayseed on 28/10/2019 15:40:36
E waves do NOT rotate.
How do you explain circular polarization?
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline Hayseed (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 350
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 11 times
  • Naked Science Forum Crackpot
Re: New Theory: How electromagnetic radiation change from inverse cubic to inverse square
« Reply #2 on: 29/10/2019 07:01:15 »
The electrical polarization can be rotated with a physical rotation of one antenna or emitter, or, one can use multiple antenna emitters and electronically rotate the feed phase.

However.....once the wave is emitted, it keeps that angle.  The only change with flight, is density.  There are no changes in the direction of the components of the wave.  Only between the separate wave pulses does the polarization change.

Waves are intermittent, not continuous, they have a 50% duty cycle, they are not continuous alternations........but they cause continuous alternations of the absorber.  The absorber has inertia and reacts to the wave in a continuous manner.  It's like bouncing a ball.  It only takes one direction of input, and then comes back.

The emission is discreet pulses.  Like discreet pushes when bouncing a ball.
Logged
The proper hardware will eliminate all theory.
 

Offline hamdani yusuf

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11803
  • Activity:
    76%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: New Theory: How electromagnetic radiation change from inverse cubic to inverse square
« Reply #3 on: 01/11/2019 03:57:57 »
Quote from: Hayseed on 29/10/2019 07:01:15
The electrical polarization can be rotated with a physical rotation of one antenna or emitter, or, one can use multiple antenna emitters and electronically rotate the feed phase.

However.....once the wave is emitted, it keeps that angle.  The only change with flight, is density.  There are no changes in the direction of the components of the wave.  Only between the separate wave pulses does the polarization change.
How do you explain my experiment showing that a simple combination of a reflector and a linear polarizer can produce elliptically polarized microwave?
We can also produce circularly polarized microwave using two partial linear polarizers.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: New Theory: How electromagnetic radiation change from inverse cubic to inverse square
« Reply #4 on: 01/11/2019 22:26:01 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 01/11/2019 03:57:57
How do you explain my experiment ......
I’m assuming this is a rhetorical question?  I certainly wouldn’t expect a sensible answer from someone who doesn’t have a clue how this stuff works; I think he just makes it up.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 



Offline hamdani yusuf

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11803
  • Activity:
    76%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: New Theory: How electromagnetic radiation change from inverse cubic to inverse square
« Reply #5 on: 05/11/2019 02:45:36 »
Quote from: Colin2B on 01/11/2019 22:26:01
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 01/11/2019 03:57:57
How do you explain my experiment ......
I’m assuming this is a rhetorical question?  I certainly wouldn’t expect a sensible answer from someone who doesn’t have a clue how this stuff works; I think he just makes it up.
I don't want to be too judgemental. I hope by showing the experiments he can reconsider his own hypotheses to align to the results, as well as other more widely known experimental results. Reasonable persons should not be too hesitant to change their mind in the light of new evidences that they previously unaware of.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: New Theory: How electromagnetic radiation change from inverse cubic to inverse square
« Reply #6 on: 05/11/2019 08:57:46 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 05/11/2019 02:45:36
Reasonable persons should not be too hesitant to change their mind in the light of new evidences that they previously unaware of.
Fully agree. Proof of the pudding ........
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.296 seconds with 44 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.