The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. When did gravity begin?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

When did gravity begin?

  • 10 Replies
  • 1377 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline geordief (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 435
  • Activity:
    7%
  • Thanked: 9 times
    • View Profile
When did gravity begin?
« on: 14/12/2019 00:45:14 »
Did the first (and only?)  gravity field start very soon after the BB?

Was it "kick started" by the Higgs field?
Logged
 



Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2218
  • Activity:
    24.5%
  • Thanked: 173 times
    • View Profile
Re: When did gravity begin?
« Reply #1 on: 14/12/2019 03:24:57 »
Gravity is posited to exist before anything else.  The earliest meaningful epoch is the Planck epoch, up to 10-43 seconds, where the universe consisted of a 'gravitational singularity', which wasn't specifically gravitational since the four fundamental forces had yet to separate.

In the next 10-36 seconds, gravity separates from the other three forces.  This is all before the inflation epoch where expansion takes place oodles faster than it does thereafter.

The Higgs field seems to come after the inflation as the strong force separates and the Higgs field confers mass on the various particles forming.
Logged
 

Offline geordief (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 435
  • Activity:
    7%
  • Thanked: 9 times
    • View Profile
Re: When did gravity begin?
« Reply #2 on: 14/12/2019 11:40:50 »
Quote from: Halc on 14/12/2019 03:24:57
Gravity is posited to exist before anything else.  The earliest meaningful epoch is the Planck epoch, up to 10-43 seconds, where the universe consisted of a 'gravitational singularity', which wasn't specifically gravitational since the four fundamental forces had yet to separate.

In the next 10-36 seconds, gravity separates from the other three forces.  This is all before the inflation epoch where expansion takes place oodles faster than it does thereafter.

The Higgs field seems to come after the inflation as the strong force separates and the Higgs field confers mass on the various particles forming.

So is there any picture of what gravity (that is synonymous with spacetime ,I have been told) would look like without a Higgs field?

Anything else to say about "gravitational singularity"? Is it "singular" in any other sense?
Logged
 

Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2218
  • Activity:
    24.5%
  • Thanked: 173 times
    • View Profile
Re: When did gravity begin?
« Reply #3 on: 14/12/2019 13:36:15 »
Quote from: geordief on 14/12/2019 11:40:50
So is there any picture of what gravity would look like without a Higgs field?
I don't even have a picture of gravity with a Higgs field.
Logged
 

Offline geordief (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 435
  • Activity:
    7%
  • Thanked: 9 times
    • View Profile
Re: When did gravity begin?
« Reply #4 on: 14/12/2019 14:34:41 »
Quote from: Halc on 14/12/2019 13:36:15
I don't even have a picture of gravity with a Higgs field.
Sorry, I should have said "rough description" rather than "picture" (but you perhaps  knew that and gravity pre Higgs  may be entering uncharted waters? Quantum Gravity territory?)
Logged
 



Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3631
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 108 times
    • View Profile
Re: When did gravity begin?
« Reply #5 on: 14/12/2019 16:51:09 »
Quote from: Halc
The earliest meaningful epoch is the Planck epoch, up to 10-43 seconds, where the universe consisted of a 'gravitational singularity'

So, what is a gravitational singularity?  Wiki tells us.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity.

Quote
……[It] is a location in spacetime where the gravitational field of a celestial body is predicted to become infinite”.   

“Since such quantities become infinite at the singularity, the laws of normal spacetime break down.


Any discussion as to what might be relevant to some postulated point beyond this, also breaks down if we treat a “singularity” as though it were a physical entity. 

https://www.quantamagazine.org/where-gravity-is-weak-and-naked-singularities-are-verboten-20170620/

Quote
Singularities…….. seem to always come cloaked in darkness, hiding from view behind the event horizons of black holes.

Now, new theoretical calculations provide a possible explanation for why naked singularities do not exist — in a particular model universe, at least. The findings indicate that a second, newer conjecture about gravity, if it is true, reinforces Penrose’s cosmic censorship conjecture by preventing naked singularities from forming in this model universe.

Hunting for the Loch Ness Monster, and other “cryptids” may be an interesting and possibly valuable pursuit if you are a cryptozoologist. You might even unearth facts that are relevant to real zoology, but the two disciplines should not be confused.

In no way am I equating theoretical physics/cosmology with a pseudoscience.  Such, it certainly is not.  Undoubtedly, the search for naked singularities, or for the reasons why they might not exist, can lead to interesting and valuable discoveries, and should not be discouraged.  However, there does seem to be a very simple answer to the question as to why they are not observed in nature – they don’t exist.

“Singularity”, in the sense of a black hole singularity, is simply a convenient term for a situation in which current theories break down.  It might be reasoned that such breakdowns occur, and are real, and that they may refer to physical realities.  Manifestly, this is so, but the relevant “breakdown” is not a physical object, in itself. 

Infinite gravity = infinite curvature of spacetime. (?)

If, at any point, the curvature of spacetime is finite, then it would require “infinite time” for it to become infinite.  Thus, it could never become infinite in temporal reality. 

If there existed in the physical cosmos a point at which the curvature of spacetime (locally?) was infinite, how could it be observed?  What would infinite curvature look like?   
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 174 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: When did gravity begin?
« Reply #6 on: 14/12/2019 17:28:30 »
A singularity is confined in the same way as quarks are confined. That tells us nothing about what is actually beyond an event horizon. Just as we may never observe a naked quark, we may never see beyond an event horizon.

Quarks are inferred from observation. What can we learn from the observations of black holes? Well not much. Only charge, mass and angular momentum. Well isn't that all we have on quarks?
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3631
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 108 times
    • View Profile
Re: When did gravity begin?
« Reply #7 on: 14/12/2019 17:58:29 »
Which seems to suggest there is a "boundary",  appertaining to the current state of our knowledge, beyond which the answer to almost any question would be "Don't know; working on it". 
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2218
  • Activity:
    24.5%
  • Thanked: 173 times
    • View Profile
Re: When did gravity begin?
« Reply #8 on: 14/12/2019 18:58:43 »
Quote from: Bill S on 14/12/2019 16:51:09
So, what is a gravitational singularity?  Wiki tells us:
Quote
……[It] is a location in spacetime where the gravitational field of a celestial body is predicted to become infinite”.   

“Since such quantities become infinite at the singularity, the laws of normal spacetime break down.

Laws breaking down yes, but the BB is not a location in spacetime, it is all locations in space (everywhere), so no gradient, tides, event horizons, etc.  The BB is not an exploding black hole.

Quote
“Singularity”, in the sense of a black hole singularity, is simply a convenient term for a situation in which current theories break down.
I can make one without a black hole.  Any continuously accelerating frame forms an event horizon, a singularity of sorts where physics breaks down, and yet is meaningless to anything not accelerating with the frame in question.

Quote
It might be reasoned that such breakdowns occur, and are real, and that they may refer to physical realities.  Manifestly, this is so, but the relevant “breakdown” is not a physical object, in itself.
Agree.  I think my example just above underscores that.
Logged
 



Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3631
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 108 times
    • View Profile
Re: When did gravity begin?
« Reply #9 on: 14/12/2019 19:25:52 »
 
Quote
Laws breaking down yes, but the BB is not a location in spacetime, it is all locations in space (everywhere), so no gradient, tides, event horizons, etc.  The BB is not an exploding black hole.

Not sure if you are agreeing with the Wiki quotes, or not.  It’s probably that interpretation thing again.

Quote
Agree.  I think my example just above underscores that.

Now, there’s a response that makes me feel less “isolated” than I do with respect to some of the speculative things I post!  :)
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 28522
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 65 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: When did gravity begin?
« Reply #10 on: 15/12/2019 22:19:41 »
This one is farfetched but interesting.

https://home.cern/news/news/physics/aegis-makes-positronium-antimatter-gravity-experiments
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: gravity  / fields 
 

Similar topics (5)

Is there a "force of gravity"?

Started by GeezerBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 51
Views: 26840
Last post 19/03/2020 20:01:02
by Bored chemist
How does the water in a water balloon behave in zero gravity?

Started by paul.frBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 7
Views: 8991
Last post 10/02/2020 22:18:15
by chiralSPO
Does anti-matter produce anti-gravity?

Started by kenhikageBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 12
Views: 8931
Last post 31/07/2017 20:40:35
by Kryptid
Why is it called dark matter instead of dark gravity?

Started by IAMREALITYBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 25
Views: 8811
Last post 19/05/2020 19:13:04
by Professor Mega-Mind
Did Einstein "kick the can" on gravity?

Started by OutcastBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 47
Views: 22897
Last post 27/03/2020 20:42:14
by yor_on
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.142 seconds with 61 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.