The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. COVID-19
  5. Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Is there coronavirus hysteria?

  • 29 Replies
  • 25708 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« on: 04/03/2020 13:23:54 »
After listening to Thoma Moore on sky news state that in Italy epidemiologists estimate that the true number of infections is around the 75000 mark, Iran has 23 members of parliament have kopped it, and suspiciously in china the number of new cases are plummeting, it strikes me that the governments are not worried anymore over the outbreak.
« Last Edit: 27/03/2020 18:22:00 by chris »
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #1 on: 04/03/2020 19:33:25 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 04/03/2020 13:23:54
it strikes me that the governments are not worried anymore over the outbreak.
How do you define "worried"?
The governments keep posting advice, warnings and information.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21135
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #2 on: 06/03/2020 11:51:08 »
Amazing that, at your considerable expense, a committee of the great and good sat for a day and came up with exactly what your mum told you to do: stay at home, don't sneeze over other people, and wash your hands.

If only some Chinese mums had told their children not to eat carnivorous mammals, we wouldn't have the problem anyway.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #3 on: 06/03/2020 13:53:35 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 06/03/2020 11:51:08
If only some Chinese mums had told their children not to eat carnivorous mammals, .......
I though they were bats (to eat them that is)
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 163 times
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #4 on: 10/03/2020 04:47:24 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 06/03/2020 11:51:08
... If only some Chinese mums had told their children not to eat carnivorous mammals, we wouldn't have the problem anyway.

If you're referring to bat-soup, it's fruit-bat soup,
 ( I dunno if that counts as one of your 5-a-day  :D ).
« Last Edit: 10/03/2020 04:51:01 by RD »
Logged
 



Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #5 on: 10/03/2020 07:21:06 »
Quote from: RD on 10/03/2020 04:47:24
If you're referring to bat-soup, it's fruit-bat soup,
 ( I dunno if that counts as one of your 5-a-day  :D ).
Depends how much fruit they’ve eaten  ;)
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21135
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #6 on: 10/03/2020 19:21:47 »
The hysteria is quite interesting and probably justified.

I'm looking to arrange a half-day meeting of about 50 people in East Anglia. Present incidence of infection is about 25 cases in a population of 5 million, so there's a 1 in 4000 probability that there will be a carrier (cause) in that group. That may represent an acceptable risk of inconvenience and minor infection of one person, but the likelihood is that a carrier would infect about half the group, so the effect is disproportionate to the cause. At  current levels of lethality, we have a 1 in 4000 probability of causing 2 deaths, so the risk is not acceptable. 
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #7 on: 11/03/2020 00:58:34 »
Quote from: RD on 10/03/2020 04:47:24
Quote from: alancalverd on 06/03/2020 11:51:08
... If only some Chinese mums had told their children not to eat carnivorous mammals, we wouldn't have the problem anyway.

If you're referring to bat-soup, it's fruit-bat soup,
 ( I dunno if that counts as one of your 5-a-day  :D ).
Yeah, just like the dog. I hear they where all fruit dogs too, and the snakes.

My problem is various members of parliament have contracted the virus now, in france italy, now the uk. It seems all together too pervasive at current levels to warrant the fear to the small number of recorded cases. If mps are getting it in the uk that is now an infection rate of about 0.125 percent already in parliament. Meaning the uk has around 60,000 cases at present  by the end of the week possibly 1 million, all over by  sunday. Almost all of the victims have underlying health conditions.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #8 on: 11/03/2020 01:03:24 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 04/03/2020 13:23:54
After listening to Thoma Moore on sky news state that in Italy epidemiologists estimate that the true number of infections is around the 75000 mark, Iran has 23 members of parliament have kopped it, and suspiciously in china the number of new cases are plummeting, it strikes me that the governments are not worried anymore over the outbreak.
To be honest Thomas moore was quoting someone from the WHO who also stated a mortality rate of 1-2%, misrepresented on the news a little i believe.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 163 times
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #9 on: 11/03/2020 02:51:46 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 11/03/2020 00:58:34
... and the snakes ...

Are there snake viruses which also infect humans ?.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00180-8
« Last Edit: 11/03/2020 03:02:09 by RD »
Logged
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #10 on: 11/03/2020 05:29:38 »
Quote from: RD on 11/03/2020 02:51:46
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 11/03/2020 00:58:34
... and the snakes ...

Are there snake viruses which also infect humans ?.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00180-8
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huanan_Seafood_Wholesale_Market

Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 163 times
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #11 on: 11/03/2020 08:27:36 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 11/03/2020 05:29:38
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huanan_Seafood_Wholesale_Market

Which apparently sells everything from badgers to wolves, (including snakes).


Logged
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #12 on: 12/03/2020 01:40:07 »
Quote from: RD on 11/03/2020 08:27:36
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 11/03/2020 05:29:38
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huanan_Seafood_Wholesale_Market

Which apparently sells everything from badgers to wolves, (including snakes).



And koalas too ☺
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #13 on: 12/03/2020 03:24:36 »
They are coming out of the woodwork now

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-51847198

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/breaking-juventus-confirm-defender-daniele-21678138

In the words of Churchill,

Quote from: Winston Churchill
A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.

Somewhere with very diligent tracking has a mortality rate of about 0.5, not great but again this is from the cases identified.

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-southkorea/south-korea-reports-114-new-cases-of-coronavirus-brings-total-to-7869-idUKKBN20Z05C

Stikes me that this is a bit of a "boy that cries wolf senario", one day it may occour for real, very quick and very fast.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11032
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #14 on: 12/03/2020 09:04:31 »
Everyone wants to shake hands with famous actors and presidents...
Logged
 

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 163 times
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #15 on: 12/03/2020 11:04:33 »
Quote from: evan_au on 12/03/2020 09:04:31
Everyone wants to shake hands with famous actors...

Except Tom Hanks ... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-51847198
Logged
 

Offline chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3743
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 531 times
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #16 on: 12/03/2020 13:48:24 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 12/03/2020 03:24:36
They are coming out of the woodwork now

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-51847198

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/breaking-juventus-confirm-defender-daniele-21678138

In the words of Churchill,

Quote from: Winston Churchill
A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.

Somewhere with very diligent tracking has a mortality rate of about 0.5, not great but again this is from the cases identified.

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-southkorea/south-korea-reports-114-new-cases-of-coronavirus-brings-total-to-7869-idUKKBN20Z05C

Stikes me that this is a bit of a "boy that cries wolf senario", one day it may occour for real, very quick and very fast.

Even if the mortality rate is actually only 0.1%, and if only 1/3 of the people on earth are infected (both conservative estimates), that's still 2.5 millions deaths. That's not a world catastrophe, but it's equivalent to a bad war (for reference, that's about 5x as many as have died in Syria so far). That's also a lower limit that we are, unfortunately, not on track to hit. The mortality rate will rise as hospitals get overwhelmed, and due to delays, obfuscation, and lack of coordination, it is more likely that closer to 2/3 of the world might get it. If the mortality rate gets up to 1% of 5 billion people, that's 50 million dead--on par with the Spanish influenza pandemic 100(ish) years ago...

So people shouldn't panic. But I would not call this "crying wolf" especially since it will take global collective action to limit the fatalities.
Logged
 



Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #17 on: 13/03/2020 01:24:30 »
Quote from: chiralSPO on 12/03/2020 13:48:24
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 12/03/2020 03:24:36
They are coming out of the woodwork now

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-51847198

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/breaking-juventus-confirm-defender-daniele-21678138

In the words of Churchill,

Quote from: Winston Churchill
A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.

Somewhere with very diligent tracking has a mortality rate of about 0.5, not great but again this is from the cases identified.

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-southkorea/south-korea-reports-114-new-cases-of-coronavirus-brings-total-to-7869-idUKKBN20Z05C

Stikes me that this is a bit of a "boy that cries wolf senario", one day it may occour for real, very quick and very fast.

Even if the mortality rate is actually only 0.1%, and if only 1/3 of the people on earth are infected (both conservative estimates), that's still 2.5 millions deaths. That's not a world catastrophe, but it's equivalent to a bad war (for reference, that's about 5x as many as have died in Syria so far). That's also a lower limit that we are, unfortunately, not on track to hit. The mortality rate will rise as hospitals get overwhelmed, and due to delays, obfuscation, and lack of coordination, it is more likely that closer to 2/3 of the world might get it. If the mortality rate gets up to 1% of 5 billion people, that's 50 million dead--on par with the Spanish influenza pandemic 100(ish) years ago...

So people shouldn't panic. But I would not call this "crying wolf" especially since it will take global collective action to limit the fatalities.
Yes that is true, but you and I will reach the end of our lives at some point. Mainly over 70s people with underlying conditions, this is not spanish flu killing 40 million people between the ages of 20 and 60. Swine flu however.(from wikipedia)

Quote from: wikipedia
The virus was less lethal than previous pandemic strains and kills about 0.01–0.03% of those infected; the 1918 influenza was about one hundred times more lethal and had a case fatality rate of 2–3%.[68] By 14 November 2009, the virus had infected one in six Americans with 200,000 hospitalisations and 10,000 deaths – as many hospitalizations and fewer deaths than in an average flu season overall, but with much higher risk for those under 50. With deaths of 1,100 children and 7,500 adults 18 to 64, these figures "are much higher than in a usual flu season".[69]

At that I would worry, 85 percent beneath the retirement age. That would raise your 0.1 percent to 1 percent

Pneumonia killed 3 million in 2016, many from colds and flu.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemiology_of_pneumonia
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline d_eizzenheim

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #18 on: 14/03/2020 15:14:13 »
This corona virus has been the talk recently. With articles appearing online here and there. Not to mention, media has made it more troubling than it actually is. While it has affected many, the disease can be prevented by being clean all the time and making sure of your immunity. I have been searching for more ideas about the pandemic and I've gone through this blog post. It may seem I'm promoting or anything, but I was brought to places by this reading. Hope we will all be safe even after this crisis.
Logged
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Is there coronavirus hysteria?
« Reply #19 on: 23/03/2020 04:32:25 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 06/03/2020 11:51:08
Amazing that, at your considerable expense, a committee of the great and good sat for a day and came up with exactly what your mum told you to do: stay at home, don't sneeze over other people, and wash your hands.

If only some Chinese mums had told their children not to eat carnivorous mammals, we wouldn't have the problem anyway.
Unfortunately they have gone a bit further than that now. I stand by the hysteria comment, basically if you are over retirement age, take it easy and do not mix too much, wash your hands etc, if under retirement age, dont sneeze on people. It is utterly ridiculous, there is not even any sport to watch other than betting which country will panic next.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.609 seconds with 76 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.